US Muslim leaders who supported Republican Donald Trump to protest against the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s war on Gaza and attacks on Lebanon have been deeply disappointed by his cabinet picks, they tell Reuters.

“Trump won because of us and we’re not happy with his Secretary of State pick and others,” says Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump. Muslim support for Trump helped him win Michigan and may have factored into other swing state wins, strategists believe.

  • Tm12@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Love the blaming of Muslims instead of the mass uninformed…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      All this reporting reminds me of the “But actually this Man on The Street Hated Brexit even though he voted for it” slew of stories.

      It’s all just nutpicking. You’ll find far more Muslim Trump voters who don’t know who any of these people are. And you’ll find plenty who are clapping like seals, because they’re just as Murdoch Pilled and MAGA headed as their white peers.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s almost like people were told a million times that Trump didn’t acknowledge Palestine existed and that Kamela wanted a ceasefire

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Stop. Just stop.

      It’s a post-truth world. Just…give up. We’re all yelling into the void. These people are being force-fed “facts” consisting of cherry picked data and sound bites from every angle imaginable. It’s their news. It’s their friends. It’s their family, and their neighbors. Their community leaders, and their social leaders, and their religious leaders. It’s in their face, constantly, everywhere they go.

      You can’t compete with that. That’s brainwashing on a societal level.

      You can’t both be right, and be victorious, in that environment. Simply because for the same amount of effort you put out expelling one falsehood, they can be exposed to a thousand more.

      I give up. I have no more faith in humanity. People are proudly digging their heads into the sand to avoid hard truths and then act shocked when “I told you so”. Fuck them, and fuck me for having to go down with them. Fucking children. Fucking ostrich children fucks. Pitiful. Repugnant. Deplorable.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You’re blaming humanity for being the way that it simply is. The lesson is that people don’t have the time or attention to fact check, and frankly I think we should have known that. We got complacent. So, now those of us who get it have to step in and make better competing systems.

        If facts are going to win, it seems they need to win stealthily, really like they always have. Science and engineering took over the world with probably less than 1% of people really having any idea how anything actually works. Objective morality in terms of universal human rights and behavioral science can be integrated into a better regulated social media, for example. It just has to be more appealing somehow and easier to access. It also has to be sexy and come with some status, and other benefits.

        I have no idea what that looks like, but thst is the mission progressives now must contend with. We have to win back people’s attention and convince them ours is the better way for them.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          The lesson is that people don’t have the time or attention to fact check, and frankly I think we should have known that.

          Why bother to fact check any one thing when it means hunting for the single edible chocolate in a pile of rabbit shit?

          You can’t even fucking Google an answer anymore, as the AI generated response is trained on all the bad data that’s bloated the system.

          Objective morality in terms of universal human rights and behavioral science can be integrated into a better regulated social media, for example. It just has to be more appealing somehow and easier to access. It also has to be sexy and come with some status, and other benefits.

          I would settle for it being a view that won’t get you expelled from a college campus, primaried out of an elected office, or purged from a high profile business position.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          38 minutes ago

          You’re blaming humanity for being the way that it simply is. The lesson is that people don’t have the time or attention to fact check, and frankly I think we should have known that. We got complacent. So, now those of us who get it have to step in and make better competing systems.

          At this point if I were God I’d be starting the rapture right now, because clearly humanity is too dumb to live and too deranged to get it over with quick and painlessly. Every American who voted Kamela would be at the top of the “Abandon Earth, we’re all going to Heaven!” queue for the USA region, because obviously that was the last couple million people living in the Modern Day Burning Rome who gave a shit.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Behind door #1: Isn’t as one-sided as you regarding a war in another country that involves your religion.
    Behind door #2: Tried to enact laws that openly discriminate against your religion just a few years ago. And is also totally one-sided against you regarding that same war.

    It’s a tough choice.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      Isn’t as one-sided as you regarding a war in another country

      Dems pandered to an Israeli government that was actively campaigning for their opposition. This wasn’t just “your anti-genocide views are simply too extreme for the average American voter”. It was “Netanyahu is funneling Russian money and propaganda into the Republican campaign apparatus while you keep telling him he’s a good boy on national TV.”

      Talk about leopards eating your face.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 minutes ago

      Behind door #1: Isn’t as one-sided as you regarding a war in another country that involves your religion.

      They’re way more one-sided about the “war” (genocide) than I imagine the vast majority of Muslim and pro-Palestinian voters are, just in the wrong direction. What part of unconditionally supplying weapons to a country that is indiscriminately slaughtering civilians is “not one sided,” oh “rational_lib?”

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We’re gonna see a lot more “Experts baffled Trump did x thing” and the word “unprecedented” show up in headlines again for at least the next four years. Sleep in the bed you made, fuckwads.

    • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I heard if you coat your face in blood and lie down in long grass with your eyes closed, the leopards won’t ever find you!

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Local sheep upset that wolf he voted for has appointed butchers to several cabinet positions

  • AliSaket@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Now that is just plain stupid. One can make a moral argument for not wanting to vote for genocide, since the situation is similar, but not the same(!), as the famous Trolley Problem. But actively voting for the other pro-genocide option because you believed him to be a peace candidate? … This is something that needs honest analysis and reflection. Both by these voters as well as by the Democratic Party. How the hell could Trump with his abysmal record be perceived as the peace candidate by so many? I do expect though, that all the involved parties will learn the wrong lessons from this.

    With all the blame, shaming and hate towards Muslim, Arab, African and Latino Americans we should also not forget: The only ethnic demographic from which Trump got a majority is: White voters.

    • D1G17AL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Stupid people wanted to claim that Harris was “the same as” Trump. That’s patently false. Someone else said it best. Most of these people are in their own echo chambers and trying to get them to actually behave and vote in their own best interest is becoming nearly futile these days. It’s too easy for people to put themselves into those echo chambers.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If any Muslim thought he gave a shit after his first run I’ve got a fuck ton of bridges to sell you.

    Taxes and finances would be the only reason I can see voting for Trump, and when you look at his plans those are also stupid reasons to vote for him.

    So basically to any of his voters except the fabulously rich ones… put a quarter in your ass because you played yourself.