100% that. The “What would you do different?” question tanked her.

https://youtu.be/VbQXthtjUPo

How often does “West Bank” come up in official Arizona documents? 🤔

Kinda looks like our ragdoll when she was little…

And if she tries to take a position in '28, she’ll be hit with “Well, why didn’t you say that in '24?”

At no point was she ever a good candidate.

Broken Clock Syndrome.

First, amazing he’s offering this… but aside from housing and feeding 80 hippos… how on earth do you get EIGHTY hippos from Colombia to India?

ONE would be challenging. 10 would be logistically difficult.

EIGHTY??!?!??🤔

I felt bad for Lost World, because Crighton went out of his way to write a novel that was a sequel to the first movie, not the first book, and then Spielberg just basically ignored it like it never happened.

I wanted to not see the chameleon dinosaurs, damn it!

The last time this happened, didn’t the FCC a) threaten Disney and b) at the same time try to go “Oh, no, no, no, we would NEVER do that…”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/30/fcc-brendan-carr-jimmy-kimmel-networks

Ever hear of Prince Randian, “The Human Caterpillar”? Born with no arms, no legs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Randian

Married, had 5 kids.

https://youtu.be/epPkcH0aIlo

Sand in the gears won’t win votes. At a minimum, we need a majority in the Senate and kill the filibuster. If the Republicans want to vote down good legislation, let them, and then hang their votes around their necks in the next election.

Current example, raising the minimum wage to $25:

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_c2590dcd-be1b-40db-ba35-89fa602f813d.html

The problem here is that it’s raised by Democrats, which means it won’t even come up for a vote, you can’t hold them responsible for votes that don’t happen.

So, win the House, pass the legislation, and let the Republicans vote it down in the Senate.

“Here are the people keeping you from earning $25 an hour!”

There is literally nothing we can do to hold him accountable as long as Republicans control the Senate and he controls the Justice Department, that’s the problem.

Fixing the system means a major, major overhaul of, well, everything and that starts with regaining the House and Senate. That will not happen if we get sidetracked with a 3rd doomed impeachment.

Which is why it’s important to hammer them with good, popular legislation.

There are legal tools besides impeachment, but like I say, it’s not a matter of not knowing the full path to victory when it comes to impeachment, there literally is no path to victory. Plus the legal tools are currently controlled by the opposition.

If 2026 goes the way we expect, the 50% majority in the House will be easy enough.

If we want impeachment, we have to run on it now. Get No Kings to swing the Senate races.

Right now it’s 53 Republican, 45 Democratic, 2 Independent (caucusing with Democrats).

33 Senate seats are up for re-election in '26, we need to flip 22 seats to win impeachment, maybe only 20 if Collins and Murkowski are willing to play ball. 4 seats will flip control, but control is not enough to impeach.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_elections

If we can’t get 20-22 Senate seats, there is no point pushing impeachment. It only has the desired effect of making the Democrats look bad and that hurts them in the run up to '28.

Except impeachment lets the Republicans play the victim card in '28. So impeachment both does nothing, and lets the Republicans go “See those Democrats are just mean!” in '28.

Instead, you pass good legislation and if the Republicans kill it, you hang them with it in '28.

“Living minimum wage? Republicans say no. Universl health care? Republicans say no. Functional immigration? Republicans say no.”

Way harder to do that if you hand them the loaded gun of a 3rd failed impeachment.

He absolutely has committed impeachable offenses, the problem is we need 67 votes in the Senate to convict him and the Senate absolutely will not do it.

So we’d end up with the same results as the last two times, Susan Collins and “I think he learned his lesson” and all that.

Nobody held the Senators accountable either. So there’s no point even pretending at this point.

What moves the needle is flipping the House in '26, getting good legislation passed, then holding the House in '28, flipping the Senate, and winning the Presidency.

THEN we can talk about the best ways to change the system.

I’d start with upper end age limits across the board for all three branches. It would need an amendment to do that.

Ideally, make it so convicted felons can’t be President.

And term limits.

Performative impeachment lets the Republicans play the victim card in '28.

Passing good legislation that gets defeated by Republicans in the Senate or vetoed by Trump gives them ammunition for even more flips in '28.

It shouldn’t be, because unless there’s a 2/3rds majority in the Senate it will be the exact same as the last two times.

Performative impeachment is pointless. Draft good legislation, then either let the Senate shoot it down or Trump veto it, and hold them all accountable in the '28 election.