

Eventually we’ll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons.
Let me fix that for you:
Eventually he’ll get his second term declared invalid, and use that as his reason for running for his third term.


It’s maddening but expected.
When corporate decisions are based solely on pleasing investors, fixing a leak isn’t a priority. It might be a long-term investment that eventually pays for itself, but it comes with a front-loaded cost that diminishes the profits of the current quarter.
The only way to get them to care about the problem is if it’s actively unprofitable or comes with personal liability for the leadership, and the only way that will happen is with regulations.
In other words: “why about the survivability of the species when we can instead care about making our investor’s loins tingle?”