If only it were that easy. A conversation with one of them would go something more like this:
“It’s not Trump.”
“Okay, prove it!”
“I don’t need to because THIS IS AMERICA, and it’s INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.”
“Like the people arrested by ICE?”
“THEY WERE CRIMINALS!”
“Even the 93% without criminal records?”
“THAT’S FAKE NEWS, LIBTARD”
Say what you will about medieval monarchies, but at least those had the good sense to permit a court jester to speak foolishly of the head of state.
Recently?
The attack was coming from ::1
Or if that’s too unbelievable, fe80:: has some scary implications while also not likely to ever be a real device.
The other reason is that I’m kinda verbose.
Some say, “why many words when few work?”
Others express their freedom to choose exactly to what extent of verbosity and verbiage they consider necessary in order to accurately and effectively communicate their previously-unspoken thoughts either through private correspondence or statements to some subset of the general populace.
It really makes you think: which rich assholes recently bought stock in grocery store corporations?
It’s not just flagrant; it’s fragrant, too. The hypocrisy stinks like shit to high heavens.
Almost. The corporate solution nowadays is for the guy who owns all of the carts to replace the horses with AI, fire half of the drivers, then demand the remaining drivers take two carts every trip.
That sounds like a great way to end up being in Russia’s shoes with failing to win a war they started. The feudalist part of that technofedualist dystopia is undoubtedly going to have imperialistic ambitions, and—somehow—I don’t think Musk’s Optimus robots are going to be able to compensate for the fact that they’ll have less than half of the combined population of Mexico and Canada.
“I do say to [Foley], first of all, I love her, because she voted for me three times, and I think she’d vote for me again if I had that opportunity,” Trump said.
He completely dismisses her concerns, then says she would vote for him again if given the chance. He’s probably right, and that’s exactly the problem.
He doesn’t have to do anything to keep his sycophants and qultists, so why would he put any effort into doing something differently?
Nothing. It will have been a “presidential duty” immune from consequences, as ordained by the bootlickers in the SCrOTUS.
If there is no way to do so in the GUI, it’s not getting fixed by them, they’ll take it to the Geek Squad if they even decide to fix it at all.
The best part is that Geek Squad probably won’t even fix it.
With the amount of time allocated to tasks and the lack of autonomy retail workers are given, the solution to anything not explicitly written in an employee runbook is going to be “we need to reinstall windows” or “it can’t be fixed, but we have a new computer you can buy”
Even if it’s not telling the full story, as long as it makes MAGA voters regret their choices, right?
… wishful thinking, I know.
And the taxpayer money spent?
… To shreds you say …
The backup plan is A Weekend at Donnie’s.
Astonishingly, most of Twitter users commenting on the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation’s instigating post are calling them full of shit in claiming the ad “misrepresents” the original clip.
https://xcancel.com/RonaldReagan/status/1981524620265046408
https://xcancel.com/shelcou/status/1981610518709186994
The unedited version even more supports his distaste for tariffs. He was a big fan of immigration too. Now the stewards of his legacy are bootlickers, something Reagan never was.
https://xcancel.com/Misanthropist_X/status/1981580610872479969
Did you listen to the link you posted? Reagan actually went even further criticizing tariffs than in the clip from the commercial.
I don’t think they actually think they’re smart. I think they’re just selfish assholes.
Time and time again, I come across the argument that “it will make the price of everything to up because now businesses have to pay workers more.”
Ok—so? Businesses are forced to pay workers to a standard that allows everybody to live without drowning in debt and inescapable poverty. Isn’t it a good thing that people won’t be suffering?
No, not to them. Their wages won’t increase equivalently, and now they have to pay more to maintain their standard of luxury. It’s wealth redistribution away from those who can afford excess towards the people who can’t afford basics. They actively choose not to support that because it’s a personal inconvenience to them.
It’s an amazing demonstration of “equality looks like oppression to the privileged” and “fuck you, I got mine” attitude.
remember when Trump pretended to care about this kinda thing?
Not really. He appointed a puppy-killer as the head of DHS and a brain-worm addled deer hunter as the head of the FDA. It’s been pretty clear that he supports armed thugs killing animals for leisure and gratification.
Now, unarmed immigrants not killing or eating pets, on the other hand…
I think you mean 99.5%. The mask is off now, and I doubt they care much about preserving the illusion of democracy now that they think they’re untouchable.
Derogatory use of the term aside, it looks like it’s time to reset the counter back to “[0] days since Elon Musk actually said something true”