Because at the time of the Nazi takeover, the party with that name was wholly operating as a rubber stamp to the most extremist right wing elements taking hold of their party. “The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea” is similarly nondescriptive as “German Worker’s Party” later purposely misleadingly named to “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” after Hitlers rise.

No, and neither did Germany.

Leave it up to moderate liberals to roll over and die. Way to signal his kingship guys, fucking top notch pick, that Merrick Galand. To think this ineffective dipshit was considered for SCOTUS. Literally a direct historical correlation to the rise of Hitler through ineffective and complacent liberalism from the socialist party. I guess when you construct a DOJ that doesn’t prosecute billionaires the whole thing short circuits when the tyrant is one… who could have predicted that except every leftist and historian?

Just FYI, there is strong terf energy in this movement if you look into its primary supporters. I’m all for withholding from men who don’t support your basic human rights, that is literally why the curve from young men to mid 20s and early 30s drastically shift left, but be careful about your associations.

They definitely are low information voters. When people hear things they don’t like from people they do like, they always assume it’s not going to hurt them until it actually does. This might eventually work if they heard it enough, but they never will and don’t care enough to pursue the information on their own.

In terms of the old white man thing, I think it’s fair to say that while people say they don’t want old people running, what they really mean is old people who aren’t all there. This should eliminate Trump, but he’s never seemed all there and he’s had a more shallow decline than Biden. Bernie doesn’t meet this qualification because he’s still as sharp as ever. Biden’s decline was shockingly fast and even turned liberals away despite his government still operating

I did get the very strong vibe from undecided voters that they really wanted to vote for Trump but couldn’t tell anyone the reason was racism or sexism because they care too much about their image with liberals or their own self-image.

That all being said, a trending search term on election day was, “Did Joe Biden drop out?” So clearly, the low information problem should be doing some heavy lifting in our conclusions.

Completely agree with these two traits being the primary obstacles. I think the Democratic party’s ability to acknowledge this is the key to future election wins. You conclusion though that the solution is for Americans to “overcome their base human instincts en masse” is very incomplete.

A few suggestions if you want to appeal to someone who is lazy about gathering and retaining information and getting off their butt to vote:

1. State directly why they should care and what you’re going to do about it in the first 2 sentences, then tell them what to believe about it instead of relying on them to have a thought.
2. Create a campaign against the media they consume to instill doubt that they’re getting the full picture (they obviously aren’t).
3. Present facts mostly to disprove the points they’ve been fed rather than defending your positions. This is both to prevent competing influence where you will obviously lose as well as to be offensively confident rather than defensively meak.
4. To appeal to the dumbest people amongst us who can barely figure out how to breath, also vaguely gesture that you will fix everything wrong and take public concerns to your office as a personal checklist.
5. Surround yourself with actual entertainment, not just politicians. The Democrats have the support of every artist who matters, have a mega-mash concert… We’re the cool party, don’t pretend we’re not. They should want to watch it like the Dre Day Superbowl even if they don’t agree with the candidate.

A few suggestions if you want to appeal to someone who is selfish and wouldn’t lift a finger in a holocaust if the target wasn’t them:

1. TELL THEM WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES FOR THEM. I’m so sick of the messaging not containing things like ROI for the government programs. Talk about how for every house we remove lead paint and pipes from it will mean less taxes for you because more people will have the chance to pay them and not be dependent on the system. Talk about how many leading technologies originated with public funds that were only possible through government spending including technology they’re watching this through, or the reason they’re not dead in that car accident, or why they haven’t choked and died on the air.
2. Tell them what the opposition wants to take from you and give to the rich, whether technically true or not, make them defensive and want to distance themselves from their donors. They’re coming to steal your hard earned tax dollars and give it to SpaceX to use technology we all paid for. Government leads and these corporate wellfare ghouls follow, and my opponent represents the ghouls. Say the exact amount of money Tesla and SpaceX gets from the government, point out that’s why Elon is groveling behind him collecting government crumbs like the most pathetic pidgeon ever.

This all fits firmly into the messaging solutions of leftist populism by the way.

The underlying assumption here is that these voters aren’t low information voters. The economy was what they themselves say they voted while thinking about. I believe it’s pretty clear that perception is more important than reality for these voters, and their perception could not be more wrong about that and many other issues. There is certainly misogyny and racism in there too, but also keep in mind that was largely felt in people staying home, not voting for Trump. Harris got far fewer votes and Trump received nearly the same as last time.

There’s no easy one size fits all blame to be had here I don’t think, as nice as simple explanations are. I believe lack of populist messaging, following safe trends rather than creating them in the minds of constituents (with exception of the weird insult), lack of emergency covid situation, sexism, and appeals to status quo systems that have flaws all played a role.

The National Review? A broken clock is right twice a day I guess. They support Trump all the same, just as William Buckley intended.

New information shows his internal polling at the time showed he’d lose to Trump’s 407 electoral votes… He still refused to step down for over a month. You are incorrect that he would have won by all metrics that can be known.

She is literally the smartest person in the court by far and remains to be. We can talk replacement when she loses her mind like Breyer did.

Seems like a reasonable ask if they’re worried for their safety.

Very well stated. We need to operate within this reality instead of the fantasy land created by those who will be fine either way.

Well the dollar was a good currency while it lasted.

Soo, trail of tears in Gaza?

There was a controversial and sexist bait letter someone at Google wrote before being let go and it was heavily propped up by right wing media as an example and justification that everything Google does from now on is left wing because they’re cancelling this poor sexist man.

My first long term job’s company instructed HR to print out the letter and give a strong endorsement of it for seemingly no reason. It basically just read to me as, “Women have strongsuits other than business success like emotions and raising children and their lack of pay is actually justified and good.” that they wanted to come from our female head of HR as opposed to our do nothing remote from Florida male CEO. These rich people are no smarter than anyone else, they just use bigger words as they stick their foot down their own throat.