So…things have been written about this. The biggest issue in Mexico is the space between cities.

You move into one area and clear it out, anyone left leaves to join others in some other places and then you have to move the police force to wherever the new outbreak starts.

It’s Guerilla Warfare. It’s not impossible to stop with force, but it takes a long time. The fastest way to stop the Cartels is by Supply Suffocation, either by product, or by banking.

The trick here is that Cartels know this, and regularly rely on the law to prevent seizures of funds, and even recently have become money laundering operations for people wanting to traffic Chinese currency, so they are FLUSH with cash.

So in this specific case, it’s like fighting the Mafia. You can greatly reduce their operations by taking out the leaders, seizure of asset or product, and removing enforcers in their organizations, but you’ll always be left with a small contingent that will continue operating in some capacity.

The thing with Mexican Cartels is that they’ve strong armed themselves into legitimate businesses like agriculture (avocados are a big one), and it’s hard to find legal ways to prove that X business is funded by a Cartels when they are already laundering money. It could look like it comes from anywhere.

It’s a cat and mouse game until the larger population feels empowered enough to report members, or fight back themselves.

I’ve gotten ransom letters for things I’ve order from UPS and FedEx. Sure seems like they have some control over it.

No. No. Just, no.

This is the dumbest take. Unless he wants to go to war with every court in the country, this ruling hands companies responsible for collecting these bullshit tariffs the power say “No”, and it starts from the bottom up.

Example: Costco was one of the first major companies to use over these tarrifs, and they’re so huge that anyone responsible for the exchange of goods that tries to collect on it, they can simply refuse.

The shipper won’t do shit. Watch.

This time is technically legal because of Hawley, but it should go back to when he started this dumb shit in the first place. We’ll see if we can get a Federal Judge to smack this down in the next week.

All these companies collecting this money just need to fucking stop, and say “Fine then sue me” to the WH, but then of course we know they’ll be flooded with ICE. Trump has a private army now that needs to be dealt with in order to stop all this shit.

Instead of writing a novel here, tried to find a post to explain what I think is happening.

Try this

She’s certainly losing that seat, to be fair.

How is it clickbait? It literally says the thing in the title

I think it’s more about calling her out.

She’s about to be voted out by Planter if the overwhelming polls are even barely accurate.

Out of curiosity, does this machine in question have a hostname that falls under the domain you’re using for DNS resolution?

Also, what are the contents of /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf?

Switch those CNAME records to A records, clear your cache, then see how it works.

I can promise you this is not a resolved issue. If it was, you’d be seeing posts like this everywhere. It’s behaving as it should.

Your setup on the Firewalls is not what I would call a “standard” setup. There is both a proper DNS forwarded, AND what they are calling “DNS Filtering” at play with that service. I can’t see your record setup, but depending on which gives the defacto answers when you make a request, you may get conflicting responses, so I would just do away with any kind of non-A records in your setup and see what happens since their docs specifically say it’s only meant for those records and not CNAME or Alias.

CNAME gives you no benefit to what you’re doing here anyway since you only have the couple machines and not MANY records pointing to various places or using named hosts requests or something.

Yes, because it would actually as an accidental Round-Robin return in the case that there is a conflict with a wildcard A record, and a CNAME which isn’t supposed to be working.

This is a combo of your DNS setup being misconfigured, and DNS caching working differently on Windows vs Linux.

Resolution is just fixing your DNS to work properly.

From the docs you linked it specifically says it only works for A or AAAA records. Don’t know how your other machines are somehow working as you thought they would.

Exciting. Can’t wait to hear the insane denials and excuses as to why it won’t be released, OR…“we lost it”.

Did you not read and understand the second picture you posted at all?

The largest percentage of donors is at the top there. It’s not AIPAC or corporate interests, it’s small donors.

What in the world are you not understanding about your own posts here?

Do you either not math or stats? It seems you don’t understand how numbers or percentages work…

Not trying to be insulting, but c’mon here. You posted something you clearly do not understand, to a response you don’t understand, and are clearly just trying to prove a point you failed at.

Literally data online saying that she didn’t take AIPAC money.

Alliances or voting history are different things. Don’t try to make a point if you can’t back it up.

Not sure what you’re trying to illustrate here?

The majority of her campaign funds come from small donors. She doesn’t take AIPAC money. What’s your point?

Nope.

I like Crockett for being a bit of a firecracker. She’s smart, she knows the law, and knows the exact right spots to push on to point out the obvious corruption of the right. She seems incorruptible.

Talarico has a softer approach, isn’t as combative, and leans on his faith a bit much I would say. I would say he probably plays better in Texas politics than Crockett might. He also seems incorruptible.

Two different personalities who are both qualified for what we need right now, but two different tools in a toolbox.