• 101 Posts
  • 3.86K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





  • So the issue is not ICE, but who’s managing ICE.

    You can say that about any organization. If the Nazis had been run by Rosa Luxemberg, they wouldn’t be the Nazis. They’d be a totally different thing.

    But we’ve been staffing ICE with ice chewing psychos for decades. I don’t believe a reformist bureaucrat can lead ICE. The organization’s rank-and-file would rebel, in the same way the CIA rebelled under Kennedy and the FBI rebelled under Obama.

    The issues, Bernie, are both who’s managing ICE and ICE itself. ICE are terrorists, you can’t just say that you will give money to ICE if they remove those two assholes ignoring all the shit each ICE agent has done so far, Bernie.

    Even the most left-wing Democrats are still convinced that an organization dedicated to terrorizing migrant workers and extra-judicially deporting Enemies of the State is too popular to dismantle. That’s a bleak prospect for the nation’s future.



  • The Republican justices have already signaled that they probably won’t strike down California’s maps

    In fairness to the Court’s Republicans, they did suggest in their LULAC opinion that the Texas and California gerrymanders are mirror images of each other. The majority opinion in that case begins with the observation that after Texas drew its new map, “California responded with its own map for the stated purpose of counteracting what Texas had done.” Justice Samuel Alito, a Republican, also wrote a separate opinion stating that it is “indisputable” that “the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”





  • Those fringe groups can grow in size and power to challenge, and thus change the institution itself.

    Was that the case at the Battle of Blair Mountain or via the anti-war movement during Korea and Vietnam?

    Slavery was institutional at first. But then the Republicans, an institution, were created to counter slavery.

    The Republicans, as an institution, existed for a historical heartbeat. They took power in the midst of the Civil War in 1861, struggled for 16 years, and then surrendered to the slavers in exchange for a single term of the Hayes Administration. Lincoln ended the plantation system and gave a single generation of African Americans an opportunity to flee their southern oppressors, before “moderates” in the party slammed the doors shut. Then it was another century before civil rights for African Americans was raised to national prominence again.

    The Radical Republicanism of the 1960s couldn’t survive the end of the decade. The 13th amendment’s “prison” clause was ruthlessly exploited almost immediately, creating a state sanctioned plantation system that persists to this day. And the expansionist policies of the Republicans during and after the post-war era turned the white supremacist tendencies of the Confederate South into transcontinental genocide and imperial expansion, culminating in the globe-spanning American Empire presided over by the Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan Administrations.

    We didn’t end slavery. We internationalized slavery.



  • Farías’ bill doesn’t stop at law enforcement. It prohibits those employed by ICE since the start of Trump’s immigration crackdown to the end of his term from working across state public school systems.

    Farías’ bill would extend the background check requirements to include an investigation of prior employment with ICE — along with employment at the Correction Departments in Alabama and Georgia from 2020 to Jan. 1, 2026.

    Representatives for unions representing California law enforcement and teachers told the Chronicle they were not yet ready to weigh in on the bill.

    Committee hearings for the bill have not yet been scheduled. The bill would need to pass both houses of California’s Legislature and win the signature of Gov. Gavin Newsom to become law.

    :-/


  • I feel torn about this.

    By and large, the second group is always in the electoral and organizational minority. It’s always on the back foot, always in retreat, always losing.

    Talking about the America That Is Imperial versus the America That Is Protesting is like talking about Vichy France relative to the French Resistance. This latter group isn’t institutional. It isn’t endemic to the social project that is the nation state. What you’re pointing to is a kind of weed that the national government needs to root out every so often in order to grow its fascist garden.

    These groups may be American by residency or outward fashion or in the superficial tokens of identity. But they are enemies of America as an administration. They are anti-American in deed. They’re an insurgency that the American socio-economic system seeks to snuff out.