• 111 Posts
  • 4.24K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Isn’t it more having difficulty focusing for extended periods?

    According to OP, they can’t even make it to the end of a sentence. shrug

    I’d say the phenomenon is more hyperfocusing long enough to figure out the point,

    and then getting frustrated as the speaker takes a long time to illustrate that point.

    I definitely get feeling annoyed when someone rambles. And I get tuning out when a work presentation or a school lecture drags on. And I get feeling frustrated when a conversation or discussion is sidelined by minutiae.

    But the “Um, aktuly, I don’t need to listen to this because I already know the answer” shit is extremely toxic behavior that inevitably sets people up to fail. If you’ve ever had to deal with student drivers before, it’s the way someone responds moments before they bend a fender.

    Getting Overwhelmed is entirely different from Knowing The Answer In Advance.




  • if you’re born into a religious family initially you just adopt it

    Right. Because there’s no inherent reason not to do so. And little kids tend to want to follow along with what they’re elders are doing.

    Compare it to how most kids initially believe Santa Claus exists because they were told so.

    Kids are told that they get presents by pleasing their parents. And then the decision making / agency is displaced onto a fictitious figure. That’s a very neat analogy for religion in the aggregate. Whether or not you “believe in Santa”, you’re still getting gifts based on your parents’ resources and generosity. If you want the newest kids’ favorite widget, you’re following the letter of the law whether or not you adhere to the spirit.

    You can also participate in some church community stuff without being a member or even going to church.

    If you’ve got friends/family who are members/do go, sure. Because they’re your social connection.

    But you’ll struggle to join a community event if you don’t know anybody - or even when/where the event takes place. Nevermind knowing what’s in the works, what needs volunteers, what needs money, and who is in charge of leading them. The more you want to participate, the more you need to attend the religious church functions. The more you want to get into leadership, the more you need to demonstrate your piety.


  • Everyone is born into the world entirely ignorant. Cultures, customs, languages, and superstitions espoused by their parents, teachers, and peers are adopted as a matter of survival. And as the individual develops more autonomy, they use the information they gathered in their youth to navigate into new cultures and belief systems, in pursuit of improved material conditions.

    You can be born into a Catholic family and become Atheist just as easily as you can be born into an Atheist family and become Catholic. What has driven the modern collapse in religiosity is - at least in my view - the mass migration driven by economic expansion and ecological collapse. People aren’t just waking up one day and deciding they aren’t gullible anymore. They’re being shuffled around by tidal forces and torn away from the historical cultures and infrastructure that had reproduced their families’ beliefs.

    As a kid, my mom was deeply Catholic and tried to get us to attend church. But we moved several times, and after each move we found ourselves at a new church (often not even a Catholic church) with an alien congregation and divergent dogma. So what had rooted her and her sisters and parents and grandparents in Catholicism never took root with me or my sister.

    By contrast, my wife’s family lived in Galveston for four generations. Virtually her entire family is devote practicing Catholics. She only slipped through the cracks because… her dad moved around a lot, particularly after her parents got divorced. Everyone else - even two of her transgender cousins - are still practicing. Churches are, at their heart, social institutions. And I think modern New Atheists often miss that fact in their quest to Own The Dumb Pious Folks.









  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlYou know it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Epstein didn’t keep a low profile. He was everywhere, taking pictures and glad-handing other plutocrats and showing up at events.

    Like, if anyone is on your short list, I would think it would be Elon Musk. Musk’s initial gambit was throwing a bunch of keggers at Stanford to make friends with the prior generation’s Silicon Valley failkids. That’s how he met Thiel and got into Paypal, made his first billion, and became an ahem Angel Investor for all sorts of glamour projects.


  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlYou know it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    this was a CIA Mossad operation that got out of hand stupid and sloppy

    Pretty much the history of intelligence services in a nutshell.

    the rich pedophiles really REALLY started liking the setup

    I do kinda wonder what the final shoe to drop was. But my money is more on Epstein extorting more money/freedom than his handlers believed he was entitled to.

    The fact that Trump took over in 2017 and Epstein was arrested/murdered a few years later suggests - to me, at least - that he maybe called up his old friend and started making a few too many insistent demands. And it occurred to Trump (or someone in his immediate vicinity) that it would be easier to just arrest this guy and wack him than keep paying him off forever.






  • It’s probably because arguments about China with “western leftists” are very fresh in the minds of “western libs.”

    China’s foreign minister says Iran war ‘should never have happened’

    I can see how this would rub certain folks raw, particularly when Iran has been an Enemy Nation for two full generations and change.

    It would be like going into every post about bad things US Republicans are doing to make it about how bad the US Democrats are.

    I might argue that the problem with the American two party system is that it represents two different faces of American capital. Republicans and Democrats have an annoying habit of agreeing on far more than they disagree.

    I don’t think you can make the same argument about US and Chinese foreign policy, even if you can argue they’re both functionally authoritarian police states.