• metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    “One German brand, the Nestlé-owned Choco Crossies, recently announced it was eliminating cocoa altogether from its new Snack Vibes line, replacing it with ChoViva, a lab-grown chocolate alternative made from fermented sunflower and grape seeds.”

    How the fudge did we end up in this dystopian nightmare? ಥ_ಥ

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    … I just buy bags of ghiradelli dark chocolate baking chips, and eat a handful, when I feel like snacking on chocolate.

    They have 72% cacao chips, but that is bit too rich for my taste and my wallet, 60% seems to hit the spot.

    Much cheaper per weight than actual ghiradelli chocolate squares or whatever.

    And you can just toss a few into some fresh hot coffee, stir for a minute, kablamo choco-coffee.

    Anyway, yeah, most US ‘chocolate’ is disgusting.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      most US ‘chocolate’ is disgusting.

      Most by sheer volume because four companies make damn near every candy bar in the grocery store? Sure. Most by percent of discrete chocolatiers? Nah. There’s tons of good chocolate in the US, it’s just priced as the luxury good it should be (turns out slavery is great for keeping prices down)

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, yeah, the former is what I meant there.

        There indeed are tons of proper local chocaltiers in a lot of places, but sadly they do not have too much of the overall market volume.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I can’t tell if this is a moment from your real life or a bit of creative writing about a dystopian future.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And I’m confused about how you found anything in that comment dystopian. Though I’m assuming that name I didn’t recognize is a brand name for an actual chocolate producer. Hopefully it isn’t a brand name for something similar to chocolate but not lol.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          You are eating baking choco chips instead of the chocolate that is for sale and also talking about how you can’t afford the richer baking chocolate all while putting it all in a faux sounding positive light. It actualy reads much like things I read written in the dustbowl and depression.

          This is not a normal state of affairs and phrasing the work a rounds like some uplifting lifehack makes it seem dystopian

  • Teknikal@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s how I’ve felt about soft drinks in the UK since they pulled the sugar tax, now every drink just tastes of sweeteners. I’m guessing most people can’t taste them or something but I can’t stand them.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, I think sucralose is the only one that doesn’t taste awful to me. Like I’ve always been skeptical of the defense of aspartame because it tastes like something I shouldn’t be eating. I was looking forward to stevia back when it got popular, but it also has that taste (I’m guessing from leftover solvent, since it’s not water soluable like sugar).

      There’s plenty of ways to make things taste great without relying so heavily on sweetness. I hate the western food industry’s obsession with it along with the capitalist obsession with selling as much as possible, because it’s resulted in the less sugar I’ve wanted to see instead meaning the sugar is replaced with other chemicals that taste sweet (and “chemically”).

      And I doubt safety studies looked at anything beyond “does it so obviously cause issues that we’ll be sued the moment we try to sell this?”

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Most sweeteners don’t bother me but stevia has a very distinct flavor that I dislike.

        As for safety, aspartame is extremely well-studied and understood. It’s been used for over 50 years now. Sucralose for 30 years. We also know a lot about the dangers of high sugar intake. The no-calorie stuff is probably healthier overall in the amounts people actually consume.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      i mean i taste it. i started trying to give up soda in general, and the sweetened waters definitely have something about them. like the preservatives in MRE’s. it’s hard to describe the taste, and there is nothing ‘wrong’ with it, but there is also something wrong with it

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    EU has laws stating how much raw cocoa a product that calls itself chocolate must have.

    US has none of that

    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      The US, UK and EU all have government regulations about how much – or how little – cocoa an item can contain and still be considered “chocolate”, but those regulations are much stricter in Europe. In the UK, for instance, after Pladis reduced the amount of cocoa bean-derived ingredients in its McVitie’s Penguin and Club bars to below 20%, both treats were officially demoted from “chocolate” to “chocolate flavour”. In the US, the threshold is 15%, and low-cocoa items like the Unwrapped Mini Hearts can still be described as “chocolate candy”.

      From the article, this is where the other answer probably got they link.

  • Lor@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This has been that way for a while now. Reeses and Hershey’s suck. They use a PINCH of cocoa powder and their chocolate tastes and feels like wax. The peanut butter filling is basically peanut flavored sawdust. They spend crazy amounts of money reduce ingredient costs while still maintaining a somewhat edible product. They end up with “chocolate favored wax/oil and sugar”. Boycott them. You can get way better chocolate at Aldi.

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      you can get better chocolate at aldi and make your own peanut butter cups at home, it’s fairly easy

      edit, Ive made pot peanut butter cups before, is delightful.

      low dose, but, infuse the marijuana bud with coconut oil and use the coconut oil in the chocolte when you melt it. You cant put much, but it’s fun none the less

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I was getting some melting wafers the other day and grabbed a bag of Ghirardelli, which has been pretty reliable in the past. I didn’t catch that they were “chocolate flavored” wafers until I was at checkout. Chocolate was the 8th ingredient.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Reeses Cups are the absolute worst candy these days. They are so terrible now, and I used to love them. The peanut filling is gross.

  • hr_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s fascinating how hard some sectors are fighting to forbid replacement meats or milks to call themselves steak or milk. But those products barely resembling the original name are completely allowed to call themselves chocolate or fruit juice (based on some concentrate and some other stuff).

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This might be the case in the US. In the EU, chocolate is taken much more seriously. This vomit-flavored abomination called Hersheys “chocolate” is probably illegal and unfit for human consumption here.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The reason Hersheys tastes like vomit actually isn’t because of the (lack of) cocoa. It’s because they use intentionally soured milk in their chocolate.

        Basically, a company as large as Hershey strives for consistency instead of quality. And that means they need a consistent source of milk. The problem is obviously that milk sours fairly quickly. So rather than using inconsistent milk (which may be in various states of souring), they use butyric acid to intentionally sour the milk. And butyric acid is also found in vomit.

        So when Europeans try American chocolate, they’re often disgusted by the taste. Americans have grown up expecting that tangy taste in chocolate, but Europeans haven’t. So it’s all they focus on, and it inevitably ends up with them thinking that all American chocolate just tastes like vomit.

      • Lor@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Aware, I only buy european chocolate now. From Aldi or the local Polish grocery.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      it’s about marketing.

      people don’t buy what is not familiar. so it’s very much in their interest to market these replacements as familiar products.

      food is a emotional thing, it’s not logical of thoughtful. people typically only eat what they know or perceive to be good based on what others eat.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They aren’t. Next time you’re at the store, actually look at what the label says. It’ll be a big “CHOCOLATE” and then a smaller “flavored candy”.

      Fruit juice from concentrate is still 100% fruit juice though. It just had the water removed and re-added.
      But they do often make it “cranberry juice cocktail”, which is some part cranberry juice and mostly apple juice.

      And just this week I saw orange juice that was also part pear and apple juice, but that’s probably because of citrus greening killing the orange groves.

  • Restaldt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I bought a caramello bar a week or two ago

    Threw it away after two bites. If i wanted to chew on wax id go find those sugar water filled coke bottle shaped ones.

    • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m assuming you of course are aware, but that is a tasting note. As in hersheys will specifically call out that tasting note as intentional if you do a tasting tour. It explained why I only ever liked their special dark and hates their regular bar.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It was very word for me. Like with most American products that were in TV series, but weren’t available in Europei was anxious to try them first time I went to the states.

        Mountain dew was amazing. Taco Bell was not all I imagine it to be, but Hershey’s was just straight up disgusting.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a tasting note, because the original Hershey’s milk chocolate chemist accidentally spoiled the milk as part of his process.

        It took a decade or two to figure out what was wrong, but by then the American public was used to vomit tasting milk chocolate.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That may be what it is now, but the original cause was spoil d milk. Because Hershey refused to use powdered milk, he had just bought a massive dairy farm and insisted on using fresh milk.

          • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Hershey doesn’t use powdered milk. Hershey himself stubbornly insisted on the recipe using fresh milk because he had ignorantly bought up a bunch of cows before getting the recipe nailed down.

            And that’s why American chocolate is bad, or so the legend goes.

            Source: I’m from Pennsylvania and have taken the Hershey factory tour many times since childhood.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Guys (and gals), there’s simple solution to all that: learn to bake.

    We are a community of makers. We write our apps ourselves, we host our shit by ourselves, we stream our music and our movies by ourselves. So what should we do when bad corporations are taking away our snacks? Make them yourself!

    Recipes are free and open. The tools are not expensive (not much RAM in the oven). There’s nothing stopping us.

    So, do we need baking community?

    Edit: So… [email protected] ? It’s my self hosted server. Will that work?

    • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The solution is, for all of you (us) who can’t find a direct source of cocoa, buying industry standard chocolate for baking and food preparations and using it. 50%, 80 an 90% cocoa bars are usually available, but they are just bars that you use as an ingredient.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Baking is relatively easy, but how do you make your own chocolate? I don’t think you can properly do that at home.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You can, but you also don’t have to make it from scratch. Various forms of real, non-ultraprocessed-and-candified chocolate are guaranteed sitting lonely and forgotten in grocery store baking aisles around the world at this very moment. There’s also the option of finding a reputable local chocolatier, if you have one. I’ve never lived anywhere where there aren’t at least several local options, if not countless, but maybe I’m just lucky that way. Even if not, there’s always online ordering.

      • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve seen recipes, which are basically just cocoa butter and cocoa powder, and they seem pretty simple, though I’ve never tried them.

        Most chocolate “making” just starts with chocolate callets. Melt them, temper it, put it in moulds, and add filling. I’ve done this, and it’s not that difficult. Of course, the quality here depends on the quality of the callets, so if you start with Hershey’s (not sure if they even make callets), it’ll still taste like vomit.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I recently made brownies from scratch, and they came out so much better than the box brownies that I usually make, that my entire family noticed, and really loved them. It wasn’t that much more work than the box, you just had to measure out the flour, sugar, and cocoa, but the difference was huge. Well worth the slight extra effort.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Did you use butter and milk or oil and water in the box mix? That’s usually the only difference. The box mix is just flour, cocoa powder, salt, etc. The quality of those ingredients doesn’t vary too much.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Butter yes, milk no.

          I saw an old Good Eats episode where Alton Brown put the brownies in for about 15 minutes, took them out for 10 minutes, then put them back in the oven until they were finished. He claimed that the interruption changes the chemical reaction somehow, and makes them better. I’ve tried it in the past, and they seemed to be marginally better, but it m.not sure.

          • rbos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            He frequently does things that make recipes 2% better for 50% more effort. Which is appreciated, but often a little silly. Sometimes though it is well worth it.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I doubt that would be significant. Real butter and real milk are the biggest difference between real rich brownies and the cheap stuff.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Cooking nerd here. You can kind of make your own chocolate.

      You almost certainly can’t make chocolate from scratch. You could, in theory do all the steps but even in the old days it was an industrial process and it’s nearly impossible to get the quality control tight enough at home. The fermentation, roasting, and grinding steps all have to be done under very precise conditions or you won’t get good chocolate.

      You could just go really old school and use the Aztec recipes but that’s not “chocolate” as most people would know it. It’s more like a spiced tea.

      Home cooks can buy chocolate (it’s worth it to splurge and get nice chocolate if you’re going through this much trouble) and mix it and shape it. You can make a wide array of flavored ganaches, coat things in chocolate, fill chocolate shells with stuff, etc.

      The hardest part is tempering. Chocolate is actually a crystal. The short version is that if you don’t control that crystal formation through careful temperature and movement control, your chocolate will get weird and chalky; if you get that all right it’s smooth and snappy. There are books and videos on it but you’ll need to mess up a bunch of batches before you learn it.

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t understand how they cant see that once we leave we leave. If you bite into that and hate it its a cycle broken and we we unlikely to trust the product ever again.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The New Coke fiasco begs to differ.

      The cynic in me imagines that they switch away from real chocolate, everyone will hate it, they’ll release a new product line that proclaims it uses real chocolate, but charge a premium for it, and people will buy it.

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s what happened with Bassets Winegums. Used to be my absolute favourite candy. Wife came back from the UK with a box,I opened it and the taste was… Different. Googled - turns out they changed the recipe after being purchased by some large conglomerate. I haven’t had one of their candies since 13 years ago. Fucking idiots.

      • ATPA9@feddit.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I eat candy because it tastes good. If it all tastes like shit they why should I eat it?

      • Cherry@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        11 hours ago

        i will have to give it up. it will be easier if its crap anyway. Learning to pay for what you actually want vrs you think you want are two different things.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There are plenty of companies still selling actual chocolate, and since it’s chocolate and not chocolate-flavoured sweets I think it’ll just become smaller and/or more expensive. Which is fine.

    • yucandu@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s what happened to me and Oreo’s during the switch from soy oil to trans-fat-free oils. They were NASTY during that transition.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Perfectly describes my reaction when I first tried Hersheys “chocolade”. If people used to that already vile stuff react to a new product like that, it must be horrible.