• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          In western states, quite a few of the people are the fascists. Quite a few more are sympathetic to fascists. And those who work forces are regularly the ones who burn crosses.

          “If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”

          ― Malcolm X

          Needless to say, we live in a nation full of uncareful people.

              • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                we have to stop making goose and gander comparisons. they’re sociopaths. we’re the good guys. it’s ok when the good guys do it.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  they’re sociopaths. we’re the good guys

                  They’re sociopaths, certainly. But they’re sociopaths who the liberal faction seem content (perhaps even eager) to roll over for.

                  I don’t see many good guys. Only the bad and the ugly.

  • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Doesn’t most of the world already work like this? I have to identify myself to vote in my country, it’s the obvious way to prevent people from voting more than one time.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The key is what id would be acceptable.

      They’ll raise the bar until only ids most people (they don’t like) don’t have and they have already destroyed the public service so getting one will ve very very hard and/or expensive

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Interestingly, it may backfire on them. For example they cite Real Id or passport.

        So passport only people who travel internationally bother to get. The rural MAGAs are less likely to get this.

        For Real Id, it’s more likely since that can be done with your license, however most people I know who do not fly have not bothered, because it’s a hassle, they have to find DMV acceptable materials for a feature they don’t even need (if you aren’t flying, you still won’t need real id for much of anything).

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I can 100% guarantee that implementation will be left up to the states, and there will be a discretionary level of federal oversight. Rural Louisiana officials will be given leeway to allow votes for people who seem genuine. Meanwhile every single signature will be audited in New Orleans, and a computer glitch will accidentally purge a lot of people. Every town of 350 people will have 4 registration offices, and every large college town will have one office open 10am to 1pm with a 2 hour break for lunch. Registered Republicans will get mail, emails and calls reminding them to register to vote. Democratic party members will get one flyer that gets lost in the mail.

          If you think these rules will be applied fairly to all, you’re a sucker.

    • ptu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah I don’t get it either. Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id. It’s been like this for a long time and it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs people here are suggesting will happen next.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id.

        I’m currently trying to get my newborn son a passport, as the offices that handle this - SSA, Post Office, etc - are rapidly being dismantled by DOGE. I have no idea how we’ll be able to maintain or renew our documentation in coming years, given that there’s simply not going to be anyone to stamp the forms and mail me renewed papers at this rate.

        it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs

        It specifically has for transgender people. We’ve seen both state and national rules changes that no longer recognize change of gender identity on forms. So a person who shows up to vote with a form that shows “Man” when presenting as a Woman is prime target for disenfranchisement.

        We’re also increasingly seeing Hispanic and Arab people targeted for arrest and imprisonment, purely on an individual not currently carrying ID (and - in many cases - despite this fact). It isn’t hard to imagine this persecution continuing into the next election cycle, with DHS agents grabbing people at polling stations.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Are people really not aware of the issues with voter ID laws? Do we really need to go over this basic shit again?

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          What are these issues? Every other country in the world ids voters.

          I’m not Trump fan by any means but it’s hard to argue against voter ID. Americans in general seem to live in 3rd world when it comes to IDs with your social security number shit etc.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            In person voter fraud is so statistically inconsequential that it might as well not exist. The idea that this is meant to prevent voter fraud is preposterous. It’s just pretense.

            All this does is create more hurdles for people who already have difficulty voting from decades of disenfranchisement. It’s the goal of these laws, and Republican politicians have literally admitted it.

            How do you get an ID if you don’t have an address? They can’t win with policy, and high voter turnout always means the results skew left, so they focus on stopping people of certain demographics from voting altogether.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s not about voting fraud but your entire culture being so crippled by fear that you avoid basic societal structures that are accepted as a net positive literally everywhere else. Maybe it’s time to stand up for yourself?

          • Flic@mstdn.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            @drmoose @prole The UK only just brought it in a few years ago, against the advice of the Elec Commission as we don’t really have any fraud and we don’t have universal ID cards so it’s complicated to know what you’d need to bring. Mostly it’s passports or driving licences which relies on people having the cash to drive or travel, and their name matching the voter roll. If someone is turned away for not having ID they might not come back.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Maybe its time to join the 21st century and issue citizen ids?

              No wonder identity theft and scams are so rampant in the US.

              • Flic@mstdn.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                @drmoose it was discussed in the 00s (in the UK!) but was massively polarising and got dropped. People didn’t like the idea of having to carry something that proved who they are.

                • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  That’s just crazy to me. How can society function when people are afraid to identify themselves to officials they should be trusting and relying on.

  • Redditsux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    8 days ago

    Trump is doing this to distract media attention from the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far, and there’s been a lot.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 days ago

      the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far

      The biggest fuck-up of his administration this week.
      His administration is a scandal factory.
      They will fuck up and make a mess, and their solution is to make a bigger mess to distract from the one they just made.
      What about the bigger mess? Well I guess they’ll just have to make an even bigger mess to cover that one up.
      Rinse and repeat.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Perhaps using Richard Cheney’s daughter to rebut the guy running for Unitary Executive was a mistake.

          No, no, no. It was definitely just voters being stupid. I guess democracy was a mistake and we should have simply consolidated power under a more liberal dictatorship sooner.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yeah, because I must think it was a good idea simply because I’m not stupid enough to use it as a reason to not vote for her. Another straw man from another “leftist” completely unwilling to accept reality.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Another straw man

              Harris lost. She performed worse than the two other democrats who ran against Trump. That’s not a strawman, its a simple fact.

              Perhaps you think it is a strawman to suggest she might have been responsible for her exceptionally poor performance?

      • Zahtu@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        So, what do you think, the biggest mess will be end of the Line? I for myself am betting on declaring war onto another Country. Or nuclear missiles. Whatever, we are fucked 🤷‍♂️

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          According to project 2025, the end of the line is martial law then full authoritarian dictatorship.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          At this point I’m not sure that there is an end of the line.
          This has been the case since he took office in 2017, we’re 8 years in now and every week he outdoes himself.
          He kept creating scandal after scandal for 4 years when he wasn’t in office, and still got reelected.
          This isn’t stopping until he’s room temperature. Hopefully the fact that he refuses to exercise, has an excess of presenting dementia symptoms, Eats McDonald’s for every meal, and has a stimulant addiction, catches up to him sooner rather than later.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      My first thought too. The timing is just too perfect.

      My second thought? This means that Trump’s team probably has executive orders just waiting in the wings, since they know how this all works. The only thing needed to supplant even awful news cycles are even worse news cycles.

      My third thought? This means every time Team Trump royally messes up something, our only reward will be Team Trump doing something even worse, because it’s the only move they have, ever.

      Until we’re all dead by their or our own hands, presumably.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes perhaps we should first require military communications required everyone involved be identified and verified, hmm?

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      That we know. That likely wasn’t the only signal chat group these idiots were using , and they probably still are.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        of course not. if it were, there would be at least one person going “why are we using signal for this?” or at least “is this ok that we’re doing this over signal?”

        they’re the most incompetent bunch of losers you could possibly bring together. I don’t think you could manage this is you put an ad on Craigslist for incompetent losers, or have a fucking dimwit convention.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Call your local & state officals about this. The federal government does not run elections. It’s the state and local officals that do even for federal office. They are the ones who chose to follow or not follow a blatantly illegal order

    Trump is threatening to pull unrelated federal funding if they don’t, but he’s been pulling funding for many states anyways for zero reason. Make sure your local & state officals know you’ll have their back if they don’t bow down

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      The US system is so weird, federal elections are handled at a lower level of power and differently depending on which state you live in, it makes no sense. You guys need an independent body handling federal elections so everyone’s vote is handled the same way no matter where they live… And paper ballots, fucking hell you guys need to go back to paper ballots.

      • watty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think the states handling election in theory makes sense. It’s a decentralized system that is harder to undermine. An independent body may bring consistency, but I don’t think that helps at all in combatting Trump’s tampering.

        Also, many states are using paper ballots and always have been.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Decentralization isn’t always better, it’s not as efficient and, in this case, it makes it so people’s ability to choose their president varies by state and in red states there’s scheming to prevent the Democrats from gaining ground.

          With an independent body and equal access to voting for all, Trump wouldn’t have been elected in the first place.

          You say it’s harder to undermine but it’s getting undermined while we don’t have issues like we see in the USA right next door in Canada.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think if we get through this, we’ll look back at this in horror… for about 60 years, and then we’ll have a crop of neo-trumpists because no one ever seems to learn anything.

  • Leeks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

    The Constitution leaves the matter of election of electors to the states.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Huh? We are presented with a choice between doing something and the end of democracy. Way I see it, its the system’s fault for putting bad choices in front of me, and the choices are, uh… equivalent, according to my internet sources. Maybe I’ll sit it out again.

      /s for the gifted triggered ones

    • Funwayguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you want to go full dystopian…

      Party assigned at birth (PAAB) based on family, ethnicity, economic background, and other social factors present when the child is born. PAAB designation must be present on ID, birth certificate, and citizenship at all times. Any attempt to hide or misrepresent PAAB will be considered felony fraud pending investigations into any extremist relations contributing to the offense. PAAB may only be changed by government application via relocation and re-education facilities. Following the abolition of the US voting system, government representatives will be automatically chosen based on majority PAAB demographic.

      /s

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Here we go. I guess congress Rs will bend, while the Ds just hold signs again. Thanks america, I hope this is what you wanted. Now bend over and spread those tight cheeks.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    This isn’t for control of the presidency but Congress. Unless Congress goes along and rejects the electorates sent by the states, the electoral college works the same. It sets us up for another constitutional crisis where the president gets to say certain Congress people are illegitimate.