• AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Generally, you’ll see terms like “demographic collapse” instead, but yeah basically.

    A lot of people were born during the immediate post-WWII years. Those people are now dying. Cause and effect.

  • bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Starts with a “oh shit these old people have expensive healthcare needs!”, proceeds to “how the hell are we going to pay for their elder benefits?” (Social Security in the US), and eventually to “even their houses got gobbled up by the banks and private capital when they had to reverse mortgage their homes to pay off their medical bills and live out their final days…”

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The “baby boom” happened between 1946 and 1964, an 18 year period. Not everyone will die within an 18 year period. Some have already passed, some will live into their 90’s and could be around until the 2060’s

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hating on everyone from a race or gender: ❌️

    Hating on everyone from a generation: 👌

    • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The ruling class owned and controlled media has been peddling intergenerational conflict for decades, and millenials remember it well, all of the news articles about how millenials are causing all of society’s problems.

      We need to realize that it was always a psyop to divide us. From boomers to zoomers, the working class must stand together in solidarity against the elite pedophile billionaire cabal running the planet.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Sort of. You do get an increase in death rates decades later as people from a baby boom eventually die. However births tend to be in relative sync (closer together anyway) during a baby boom say over a period of a few years, while deaths are much more spread out maybe over a decade or more. That’s because other factors come into play such as individual health, and the differences in people of the same age’s health depending on economic state and lifestyle etc. In otherwords, lots of people may have been born in say 1945 but their deaths will be spread out over years because not everyone dies at the same age.

    Many western countries are going through a period of natural population decline due to low birth rates and increasing death rates as baby boomers from 1945 onwards start dying. But those deaths are spread out, and somewhat offset by immigration. So yes more people are dying but populations are overall stable or even growing as immigrants flow in.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s normally thought of as more of a “baby bust” but same thing really, a big whack of old people around for a while.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Of the 76M Boomers born between '45 and '69, 64M are still alive. With a life expectancy of 85 and the first traumch entering their 80s this year, we would expect to see a rapid fall off in the population (or a rapid climb in life expectancy average) over the next decade

    • logi@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You have to be careful with life expectancy. The LE of someone who is already 80 is much higher than that of a newborn. There are actuary tables if you want to look for them.