

And in greater numbers.


And in greater numbers.


I heard it was because they used VPNs! (/s if needed)


This is the thing with right wing talking points, they draw a connection between the main issue and one singular point that contributes to it. Then they talk incessantly about that one point while ignoring everything else that causes it Oh btw, the one point just happens to allow them to scapegoat "the other"TM for the whole issue.
This is exactly what you’re doing. Down to a tee.
You draw a connection between coal (“majority source”) and carbon. Then you talk incessantly about coal as if that’s the only cause. You give a cursory head nod to oil, and then right back to coal (the one singular point). Right back to ignoring CARBON (the actual issue). All so that you can scapegoat China (the other).
You forgot India this time, because when you see it’s #125 on the list it’s ridiculous to blame them. What else, you continue to ignore per capita CARBON, see previous link.
You’ve proven you’re just regurgitating Fox points. Ciao.


Yes that’s why I said “I wonder if they can use that she and other methods to get the population down to zero.” Zero means eradication.


Spaying and neutering and releasing is more effective because then they still compete for the same resources, pushing reproduction down. I wonder if they can use that she other methods to get the population down to zero.


China is number one carbon emissions and coal powers 60% of their grid. This is my career.
Just keep on those Fox points there. Now you’re ignoring mfing population. I worked it out, China has 4.08x the population. Over 4 times the population and you want to ignore that, teehee of course. And right back to coal only, ignoring the actual thing that matters: carbon. You’re really just proving my point that you’re regurgitating Fox points.


Good thing you can ignore everything else polluting the Earth. JFC. And just coincidentally spout Fox’s line. JFC. And ignore the actual problem of fucking CARBON. JFC. “Teehee the US just has too many electrical luxuries teehee, I’ll just ignore the HIGHER CARBON teehee.” JFC.
I don’t believe you for a second. Any rational person would look at the actual issue of carbon.


Ok I’ve had fun so I guess I’ll try to educate you.
You’ve fallen for right wing talking points blaming China for climate change. Notice how they hone in a singular talking point while ignoring everything else? They don’t talk about carbon, they try to take a singular point coal.
Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita
Sort by emissions per capita and see where countries line up. US #16, China #25. India #125.
That’s not to say that coal is fine. But when you hone in on that singular talking point and blame CHINA and oh yeah INDIA bad countries why are they so bad bad bad, then you’ve fallen for right wing Fox news screaming “CHINA’S COALL!”
PS watch for them blaming cement use too, which of course developing countries will use more of.


You forgot the cement use!! CHINA BAD FOR USING CEMENT!1!


Yeah China bad bad bad bad bad! CHINANNNAA!!


Don’t forget China needs to stop using cement! We can use it though of course.
And all those 3rd world countries aren’t allowed sidewalks!


No one’s willing to go first and put themselves at a competitive disadvantage. It needs to be uniform action. And without the US willing to participate it’ll be as slow as molasses.


a senior DOGE figure named Donald Park tried to reassure his colleagues that they were still ‘brothers in arms’ and that Musk would continue to protect them.That led to another protesting and advising, “Guys, seriously get your own lawyer if you need it. Elon’s great, but you need to watch your own back.”
“Guys have you tried being a rich billionaire who can buy your own way out of trouble? Now get back to work.”


“It’s just a Tibetan good luck charm!”


I love messages that start with snark.
You do realize that people are individuals, right?
Yeah there are some intellectuals, and some that understand their oaths, but they’re far outnumbered by the people that joined the military because they had no options. And people that watch Fox 24/7 generationally who know a libtard when they see them and hate them so much and know better than their nerdy superior.
Last actual point: Don’t confuse officer command with the masses of soldiers that have watched Fox 24/7. The officers may know and may not follow, but many soldiers (not all, because why do I think I have to put in all the caveats) are lets just say entirely different. Like if you think it’s only grandparents being swayed by Fox then I have no words. Ok I’m out.


“It is insurrection, plainly, directly, without question,” Miller later told Fox News. “It’s a general call for rebellion from the CIA and the armed services of the United States by Democrat lawmakers, saying that you have not only the right, but the duty and the obligation to defy orders of the commander-in-chief that those who carry weapons in America’s name should defy their chain of command and engage in open acts of insurrection.”
It’s a short article that’s mostly his quotes, worth the read.


to know you’re not supposed to open up on a crowd of fuckin kids.
Unfortunately Fox has been screaming that the kids/Dems are traitors for 20 years now. And that Patriots something something. I don’t think a little ceremony is going to undo decades of brainwashing to hate libs.
The water source is salt water?


The widow of the first Soviet engineer to die in the Chornobyl nuclear power plant explosion was killed on Friday in Russia’s massive drone and missile attack on the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy described Nataliia Khodemchuk as the victim of a “new tragedy caused by the Kremlin”, nearly four decades after her husband, Valerii, was killed inside Chornobyl’s nuclear reactor number four.
No I’m wrapped up in reality: carbon.
Ok I really have to peace out of this. Just like the other guy who talked to you said: you aren’t absorbing anything.