Some monkey

Won’t that just drive business to the city-owned stores? Sounds like he’s trying to help!

Remember that Million Little Pieces debacle? I think she’s just easy to fool.

I’m sick of the lump on top of his neck

At least she got the colors in the right order!

Maybe they learned to swim…

I have real sources in other replies, don’t feel like repeating them again to you now, sorry

Then why did ask? Seems like you do care…and you should! Municipal elections are super important for the kind of transformative grassroots movements needed to wrench what tiny amounts of control away from the oligarchs that we can, while elections are still being held. Vote, bitch!

Bro, this isn’t an opinion and that’s a massive misrepresentation of my comments. Obviously city elections are “political”, obviously candidates are affiliated with parties based on their personal beliefs and intentions, but that doesn’t change the fact that objectively, most city election ballots don’t include party affiliation information. Someone was wondering why they couldn’t find that information and I simply offered a possible explanation. Sorry reality seems to have hurt your feelings, idk what else to tell you 🤷‍♂️

Election ≠ Candidate

Make sense?

Your reading comprehension isn’t as good as you think it is, I addressed that already.

Whatever’s between milk and Pepto Bismol I guess

I’m sure they were affiliated and financially supported by a party, and some municipalities do run partisan elections, but “mayoral elections are officially nonpartisan in most of the nation’s largest cities”, insofar as party affiliation is not listed on the ballot. I’m sure mayoral candidate party affiliations are well-known/easily determined in big cities, but in small towns like the one I grew up in, the info isn’t necessarily there and there’s not necessarily anyone even looking for it.

4°C is 39.2°F, which, at least in the imperial system, is less than 40. And yeah, different governments have different regulatory standards, this is very very very common. Certainly the difference between 40° & 43° is less crucial than the difference between 40° & 100° and of course all foods (and the bacteria involved in their spoilage) are different (some things are considered safe up to 45°F for instance), but you have to plan for the worst-case scenario to be safest. And as I’ve said elsewhere, this is the industry standard, which is naturally (in America at least) driven by fear of liability litigation more than science, so it’s bound to be stricter than is perhaps normally necessary.

And most meat dishes, egg dishes, pretty much anything containing dairy, most raw/cooked produce and produce-containing dishes, opened canned goods, etc, etc. Way more than just “starchy foods”

If your fridge is warmer than 40°F, it’s not working properly. Commercially, prepared food is acceptable to use/sell for a week in the fridge before it has to be thrown out. Practically, this time is often longer, but a week is the safest bet.

Most local governments in America are “officially” non-partisan.

Edit: I’m not wrong 🤷‍♂️

Yeah, I mean there’s only one hour of real danger there and those are the food service rules, so they’re going to be as strict as possible. They also teach that prepared food can’t be served after a week in the fridge, even though it often lasts longer before spoiling. I personally don’t enjoy puking and shitting my brains out, especially as a direct result of my own avoidable actions, so I play it safe.

Don’t eat lasagna that’s been between 40° and 140° F for more than 4 hours!

The “st” is implied, it’s just one of those things you have to get used to. Like reading prices here, it looks like “$25”, but you would read it as “twenty-five dollars.” No one says “it costs dollar-sign twenty five.”