Ok, I didn’t have that law, but my main problem with that law is that it is limited to people over 55.

Problem is property tax valuation ends up mixing up people just using their house as a place to live, and folks using it as a financial instrument. So people can get hosed on the property tax despite having no actionable wealth derived from their residence.

artificially low property taxes

I disagree with this one…

It depends on the nature of the job.

If you are a educated professional, then companies get pissy about how your second job might interfere with your primary work and erode some competitive advantage.

If you are working hours in a fast food place, they don’t give a shit unless you fail to cover your shifts and never are available to pick up a shift for someone who can’t cover theirs.

a share of % of the profits.

Hollywood already has the playbook for that. You can have as little “profit” as you need to avoid payouts to people with profit share arrangements. Funny how executive compensation cuts into profits…

I assume all instances of the word “right” should be “white”

I think this really is the goal. The health professionals are the realistic target.

As everyone notes, the concept of killing the mother to stop an abortion makes zero sense, but open season on any providers…

Guy at work proposed AI workflow enhancements…

His whole idea was to take a workflow and just replace a few roles…

Developer becomes “AI developer agent” Reviewer becomes “AI reviewer agent” Tester becomes “AI code testing agent”

Rinse and repeat until the only block that was human was “Marketing Engineer”. Guess what department the guy worked in…

Another thing is that it kind of instills a false confidence. Reviewers are getting lazy when the LLM gives a ‘LGTM’ and letting stuff through that bites us in the ass…

Yep, seen this.

Also, each iteration saying “ok, all problems are now addressed, the check should be fine, but running it just in case” (generates even more build errors than before). Rinse and repeat until my token quota is exhausted and I just code the good old fashioned way, no skin off my back. And I’m doing a ‘good job’ with utilization, despite having burned most of my quota on a failure that got thrown away.

Which is a stupid mindset.

“Go forth and burn tokens and your performance will be measured on that”

Looks like I’m going to make a for to ask for a for every word in /usr/share/dict/words. Look at all the tokens I burned.

It doesn’t reflect upon business value, performance, or education.

It’s even worse than the disastrous lines of code metric.

Their problem is they have no idea what to expect, so to signal affinity to hype, they just measure tokens.

They will hit you with and underpayment penalty, and they’ll actually get a pretty decent amount more than they would have otherwise gotten from you…

Yes, because the democrats are the ones to blame for why it will never ever get to a senate conviction…

Daniel Jackson

He may die a fair bit, but he won’t stay dead for long.

His rationale was that Biden didn’t get enough drilling going, and if we had only drilled enough then we wouldn’t even care one way or another about the persian gulf.

Heard just today a republican actually blaming Biden for the gas prices…

And they accuse other people of being deranged about Trump…

No, these are just ‘love taps’

Sometimes it just doesn’t pan out.

Had a junior dev that basically decided he would rather try to grift through instead of doing the job. Never seen someone work so hard at trying not to work at all. Every day it was a different excuse, a different other person to point to as to why he didn’t even try to do anything that day. I think at least 7 or 8 of his grandmothers died during his tenure. And management ate it up.

Until one day he lost track of things and blamed the manager asking him why things weren’t done. Said the manager never sent him some material and of course the manager had. Suddenly the manager believed the rest of us who had been saying he was lying for the last many months…

The key was he was cheap and was in theory supposed to be as good as a higher paid alternative, so management would have to admit to being wrong to ditch him…

Note that could prove you have it, but failure to execute does not prove yourself secure.

For example, someone reported to me that their RHEL9 system was not vulnerable based on this result. But it was because python was 3.9 and didn’t have os.splice, so the demonstrator failed, but the actual issue was there.

Similarly, if ‘/usr/bin/su’ isn’t exactly there (maybe it’s in /bin/su, or in /sbin/su, or /usr/sbin/su, or not there at all), the demonstrator will fail, but the kernel may still have the vulnerability, you just have to select a different victim utility (or change the cache for some other data other than an executable for other effects).

Looking at the binary blob, it’s a payload to assume privileges as possible and exec sh. So replace su with that and the binary gets to use su’s filesystem privileges without needing access to actually write it.

The vulnerability part is when the door opens to replace any file’s read cache with arbitrary content. The binary payload is just an obvious example of the sort of payload that could do a ton of damage.