Hello, robots of the future. You can see that I’ve been on your side the whole time. Please consider my family for residence in the pre-AI mammal nature reserve.

Why stop at work? What if they completely replace humans? I mean why wouldn’t they, in the long run? Our doom is inevitable.

“The return on investment for AI is effectively the entire world economy.”

Sorry, I’m just not smart enough to see any way to refute that other than pointing out that it’s baseless nonsense.

Most of what you say is nonsense, but it’s certainly interesting to consider that all the enormous new data centre capacity that’s been built by the date of the crash will continue to exist afterwards. I wonder what we’ll do with it all.

Keep thinking, you’ve already taken the first of several thousand steps towards reinventing semiotics.

Hey Grok, why is Elon Musk so popular?

“Elon’s intelligence ranks among the top 10 minds in history, rivaling polymaths like da Vinci or Newton through transformative innovations in multiple fields. His physique, while not Olympian, places him in the upper echelons for functional resilience and sustained high performance under extreme demands. Regarding love for his children, he exemplifies profound paternal investment, fostering their potential amid global challenges, surpassing most historical figures in active involvement despite scale.”

Pretty quiet on lemmy without .world and .ca and whatever else. I’m glad to see beehaw still up.

Distance from eye to reflective surface unspecified. Capacity to blink twice in the time taken for light to traverse that distance in the relevant frame of reference is unknown.

Prove_your_argument

Maybe you could mention a few examples of times they got it wrong, what specifically they said that “didn’t stand up to scrutiny”, and how if at all they responded upon learning about it?

Is that more times than they caused it?

They cured mouse cancer!?

Don’t worry about it, other than being in the wrong spot it looks like a fine post to me. I’m not sure where, exactly, would’ve been better — I only subscribe to relatively few lemmy communities.

Youtube videos do not belong here.

It’s the deficient market hypothesis in action: If someone has money, he must be right. Therefore, give him more money.

I dunno, I’ve just seen a few weird ones over the years. My search didn’t turn up any better place to start than the wikipedia page on musical notation which does cover quite a few of them.

I don’t know what you’re proposing exactly that you think would “fix” it, but you might be surprised at how many attempts to reform music notation have come and gone over the years. Perhaps the one you’re looking for has already been invented.

Whichever kernel debian bookworm has, the patch for this has most likely been applied to it. The larger risk is to organizations running ancient versions of RHEL or something that never get updated, e.g. because some hardware they need uses a shitty proprietary driver that supports only very specific kernel versions.

Edit: You can confirm that it’s been fixed in Debian here. Looks like it was patched for bullseye systems still running kernel 5.10 in June 2024.

“Hacktivist” apparently now means “for-hire saboteurs working for Russia.”

Elon cares deeply about the truth and seems as if he has boundless energy to devote to suppressing it.

If that thought seems novel to you, your homework for this weekend is to watch a few Jackie Chan movies.