Jeremy Scahill and Murtaza Hussain
Feb 18, 2026

A former senior U.S. intelligence official who is an informal advisor to the Trump administration on Middle East policy told Drop Site that, based on his discussions with current officials, he assesses an 80-90% likelihood of U.S. strikes within weeks.

Iran realizes that it is facing an unprecedented threat from the U.S. if a deal that conforms with Trump’s terms is not reached, former Pentagon official Jasmine El-Gamal told Drop Site. “This is not a dress rehearsal,” she said. “This is it. This is not the negotiations of last year or the year before or the year before that. They’re backed into a corner. There’s no off ramp.”

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Every American who called Russians orcs better be getting ready to fully embrace that label.

  • Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Iran is such a beautiful country. I’ve watched people motorcycle and bicycle through it on YouTube and the people are so kind and warm. It’s really upsetting the way America wields it’s might.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So just clarify, Russia, which we were all promised would drop a nuke on Ukraine, still hasn’t (and won’t, let’s be real; this is Russia, not America), while America is most likely about to conduct their second (third if you count Hiroshima and Nagasaki as separate incidents) nuclear attack?

    And you just know the news is gonna whitewash this

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The point would be to let the world know just how unhinged the Burger Reich is and that they’re willing to end humanity if they don’t get what they want.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Trump is desperate to be remebered in history as ANYTHING besides the chikd rapist he is. See also why he has been demolishing DC to build shitty Trump monuments. Dropping a Nuke would put him in the books too.

    • gressen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Nobody is planning a nuclear attack. Name your sources or stop spreading fear and disinformation.

      • hotspur [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t have a link for it, but so far the only source for the nuke rumors I’ve seen is a 4chan post claiming that Israel is going to use tac nukes to disable missile bases and possibly get a leadership bunker in Tehran. The post is worded to suggest that the poster is someone inside some aspect of the operation or military buildup which I suppose is getting people to take it more seriously, but it’s an anonymous source on 4chan, so not something credible.

  • P1d40n3 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Trump will unleash a whole new level of hell upon this world. Just to feed his ego.

    The moment Iran sinks an aircraft carrier, Donald will respond with nukes. Assuming that the madman doesn’t start with a nuke.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I really hope not, but if he does, it will be spectacular self-own as it’s bound to turn the whole middle-east against USA due to the literal fallout.

    • Socar@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      there is a 0% chance Iran has the capability to sink a carrier.

      • P1d40n3 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think you are wrong. Iran has a large suite of ballistic missiles. Unless the carriers stay out of the max range of those arms, a carrier will be sunk.

        • Socar@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No, Iran lacks the capability of hitting moving targets at that distance. You need real time data for that kind of operation that basically nobody except the US (globally) and maybe China Russia France and GB (locally) have.

          During the retaliatory strikes against Israel they missed targets the size of military bases hat long range.

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Iran is one of about 3 or 4 countries on earth that is both capable and motivated to sink a US carrier. They have one of the most powerful missile forces on earth and will be in the defensive position.

  • dizzle18@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Is the likelihood of an invasion based on something Iran is doing? Or is it dependent on how horrifying the next Epstein file drop will be? I mean…I know the fucking answer to this already. Doesn’t make it any less infuriating. This piece of shit will start World War III, all to distract everyone from the fact that he raped children. “No new wars.”

  • choui4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I know this is naive but is there ZERO international efforts to stop this blatant terrorism?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Russia and China have been sending military aid to Iran. China has also cut the US off from rare earths supplies which is affecting American military production. Clearly that hasn’t been a sufficient deterrent though.

      And there’s really nothing that can be done in terms of international law because the US simply ignores it.

      Obviously neither Russia nor China want to have a direct military confrontation with the US either. That would be WW3, and likely lead to a nuclear holocaust.

      So, it seems like a war on Iran is unavoidable at this point.

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Sadly, it’s just Bibi and Donnie with their, ahem, questionable motives, who seem willing to intervene there

          • choui4@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Im not advocating for that regime. Thats a separate issue.

            However, the usa abd pissrael goaded Iran into a much more severe reaction. Do you remember when pissrael said they had agents inciting insurrection amongst the protesters?

            • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              They ‘goaded them’? They started torturing and killing all opposition the very day they took power. Didn’t need any help for that

              • choui4@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Again, this is not me advocating for the regime. However, as an anti-imperiliast, I can hope that the people of Iran make changes to their government on their own, without 2000 lb palestinian child murder bombs from the usa

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Eh, it’s Iran. Most of the world hates them, so good luck gathering support.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Europe outsourced their militarism to the US for 40-60 years.

      Who would stop this? As in, who has the forces to do so?

      • choui4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Ugh, its so true. But like, what about the UN ( i know, i know). What about congress? (Again). Where is anything?

        • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          But like, what about the UN ( i know, i know).

          Well, I mean, do you? You’re asking about a body created by and hosted in the US and funded also largely by the US. It’s toothless and useless because nobody has ever done anything substantial to legitimize it except the US and now that the US has decided that unilateral fascism is the easy path, what exactly does anyone expect?

          It’s like a microcosm of the sum of Europe’s problems rn, tbh.

          • choui4@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            But surely there are economic sanctions or SOME even milqtoast consequences that can get ball rolling

            Im aware how reckless the un is but those sorts of rebukes on the international stage DO make a difference

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I dunno what planet you’ve been on, but the international efforts for the last few major wars have been very little but finger wagging.

      • choui4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I totally know that but like … notning? Really? UN? NATO? WEF? Anybody?

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It used to be the USSR but that era is long gone and the US filled the void.

          Not even China wants to go down that route.

          Iran also failed to properly maintain and upgrade their military since the end of the war with Iraq. They have an internal political issue which is why they have the IRGC, which is a completely separate entity from the national military.

          It was in the supreme leader’s interest to keep the main military weak to ensure he couldn’t be couped, but now that has left them extremely exposed.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    yeah I saw almost no coverage on this today. the zone is flooded, and boy is it shit.

    Don lemon though, they covered it extensively.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Sadly both sides are eager to attack Iran 😭 😭 😭.

      Reminder Schumer started taco trump because Trump was hinting he may be soft on Iran not for anything he does to the America