I see your point and accept it. However, I don’t think that takes away from the broader fact that this is significantly less likely to happen to white people compared to Middle Eastern.

Lesson learned for all the non-whites: if you see white people in danger, walk away because they’re not going to let silly things like “literally saving their lives” get in the way of assuming you’re the bad guy.

If this is genuine, please touch grass. If not, please fuck off.

Again, the “assuming you’re the bad guy based on your ethnicity regardless of what you did” part has been shown to actually happen to non-white people much more frequently than white people in white majority countries.

I admit I was too snarky/aggressive/us-vs-them with my wording, I see your point there and deleted that comment as I no longer wish to say those exact words. But, is the fact that THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENS not a bigger problem that plagues society than how politely people articulate it? How about we work on not having this happen or at least not having it be more likely to happen to certain ethnicities than others so no one makes those comments again instead of dismissing it as the person who points it out needing to fuck off? Do the people responsible for causing this racial injustice not also have the responsibility to contribute to mitigating it in the future?

What’s the real race war? Making random snarky comments on Lemmy or literally attacking a guy trying to save you because he fits the collective description of a “terrorist,” or defending those attacks as an “inevitable” part of saving people when it’s clearly been shown it’s many times more likely to happen to ethnicities perceived to be more likely to be terrorists?

Are all the large scale studies showing that police/the public in white majority countries are much more likely to assume a non-white person is a perpetrator whenever any attack on the public happens also pushing race war shit? You can’t imagine how this could have possibly played out differently if the guy wasn’t Middle Eastern “like the terrorist who shot at us?”

How else are people supposed to fight terrorists? Say please and thank you?

kicking the gun

Because someone intent on helping them shoot people definitely does that.

with his hands up

Oh so they could clearly see he wasn’t holding a weapon.

So why did the public mob the guy then? They saw him literally fighting the gunman and still assumed he’s one of them? If it was a pale skinned blond guy they 100% would have believed him when he said he’s trying to help, but because he’s Middle Eastern they refused to see past the “terrorist” stereotype.

And if they didn’t see him fighting the terrorist, that’s worse. They attacked a random Middle Eastern guy assuming all of them are terrorists. Why didn’t they go after any of the white people on the beach in the same way?

deleted by creator

Dramatic, pause

deleted by creator

It happens.

With a much, much lower likelihood of it happening if the guy was white, I bet.

He got shot because he “looked” like a terrorist in the police/public’s eyes, despite being the one fighting the terrorists.

the refugee is then challenged by members of the public, who mistake him for a terrorist

Ooh I wonder that ethicity he was and what ethnicities the “members of the public” were.

All liquids and gels are edible all the time, no way you can’t fit a liquid or gel of all things down your esophagus. Some just have unwanted “side effects” on your body after it’s eaten. Like mercury.

Late night infomercials with high pressure sales tactics are where the real innovation is!

I submit that this happened not because Australia recognizes Palestine, but that it doesn’t recognize Palestine in all but pointless words. If Palestine was actually recognized as an independent country on the world stage this wouldn’t have happened.

Though whoever feels the need to shoot random people partying on a beach is obviously not right in the head so there’s also a chance they would have just picked something else as their reason.

Also, “Hamas kills trans people which is why we should let Israel kill everyone instead, including the trans people.”

As a rule of thumb, don’t trust the packaging when it’s going out of its way to assure you it won’t cause some negative side effect. They have a massive conflict of interest because they want you to buy it, and more importantly they legally don’t have to actually prove it’s factual, the burden is on you the consumer to sue them and prove they’re lying in court if you think that’s the case, and they’re well aware the vast majority of people don’t have the time or resources to do that.

If an online source is telling you it will cause that side effect, I’d be inclined trust that more (assuming the site is reputable and they’re not trying to promote a different product).

My dog chewed a plastic bag containing the special proprietary cables for a computer display/input switch. I think she just wanted the bag and the cables were collateral damage, because she’s never chewed cables on their own before or since.

They refuse to sell the cables separately so it made the device itself useless unless I buy another one for like $100. Ended up not bothering and giving up on having a peripheral switch because I refuse to give them that much money again just because a $10 set of cables broke and reward their shitty business practices. I just manually switch the actual display and USB cables when I want to control another computer.

Also blew my mind just how strong a bite force even a small breed dog has. She totally crushed the metal casing surrounding the plug and shattered the plastic molding in the less than one minute she had it. I can’t even do that with my teeth (then again I’ve never tried).

I prefer Ghost of Christmas Imperative.

“Stop exploiting workers you bourgeois piece of shit.”

Or for the functional programming enjoyers, Ghost of Christmas Declarative. He doesn’t tell you what to do, he just passive aggressively defines what you should be.

Because human offspring are so damn needy and take so long to mature.

How ACAB works (for nerds):

public abstract class Bastard {}

private interface DictatorshipOfTheBourgeoisie {}

private class Cop extends Bastard implements DictatorshipOfTheBourgeoisie {}

Induced demand also applies to social media. Having a dedicated community for something can cause people who had not thought to post something (because there was no dedicated community for it and they don’t want to risk putting it in a community where it doesn’t fit) to post.

Related, I really think we could use a /c/whatever community, for creative works and posts that don’t fit into any existing communities. It will also serve as a good place to assess when a community should be created, since you can just see what a lot of people are posting.