☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

  • 4.98K Posts
  • 7.89K Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 18th, 2020

help-circle


  • Yes? We’re in agreement here. The neighbors are happy to get their oil at a discount. They would not be getting this discount were it not for the sanctions, since there would be more competition in the buyer’s market.

    You’ve never seen a company offer a discount price initially to get people to sign up? This is the same approach. Once trade relations are established, and these countries build up infrastructure around buying Russian energy, Russia will start raising prices. The key part is that it’s already more profitable for Russia than selling pipeline gas to Europe on fixed contracts ever was.

    If Russian leadership was under the illusion that NATO was secretly an offensive alliance, and thus needed to preemptively invade Ukraine, it should be clear with this Hormuz straight business that it really is a defensive alliance. Trump tried to get the NATO members to help and they all told him to pound sand.

    NATO has literally been invading one country after another ever since Yugoslavia. One has to lack even a shred of intellectual integrity to claim that it is s defensive alliance. The Hormuz business simply exposes the fact that even Europe isn’t imbecilic enough to follow the US into this debacle directly. However, NATO members are currently actively participating in the war by providing the US military bases to stage attacks on Iran. This is in fact direct proof that NATO is not a defensive alliance. Try to put at least a bit of effort into your trolling here.

    They’re down year-over-year, with the biggest hit coming in the first year. The sanctions did what they could (forced Russia to offer big discounts) and now they’re stable in their effect.

    They’re not down year over year in any meaningful sense. It’s pretty clear that they are in fact quite steady. What’s down is economic activity all across Europe with energy prices being three times that of US and six times higher compared to China. The European industry is no longer competitive on the global stage. Europe cutting itself from Russian energy was the equivalent of cutting off your own feet to spite your cobbler.

    I mean, this is an argument fraught with “nuh-uh” and hand-waving on all sides. “Worth it” is very subjective, especially when the harm to both sides is relatively minor, in the grand scheme of things. Both sides have adjusted to the new reality.

    LMFAO no it’s not. Every single economic indicator from Europe shows shrinking economic activity and growing inflation. There’s a reason there’s no major European leader polling above 20% right now.

    The European oil sources are super diverse, there’s no need to make this a false East vs West thing. I’m literally just here to explain that Russia is selling oil at a discount because it has to, not because it wants to.

    If by super diverse you mean that you buy Russian oil at a markup from Kazakhstan, India and Turkey then sure.















  • The strategic reality of Russia’s neighbours is obviously that they can’t change their geography and have to find a way to live with Russia. That should be obvious to anybody with even a minimally functioning brain. The war in Ukraine is a direct result of Europe acting in the American interest and participating in expansion of NATO. It’s incredible to me that people still can’t understand this basic fact.

    Meanwhile, the report you yourself linked clearly shows that Russian energy exports have remained stable overall. The harm that’s been done to Europe is far greater than any profits Russia has lost over the past 4 years. Not only that, but with Russian supplies cut off and now the Gulf, Europe finds itself entirely dependent on the US which is a predatory power.


  • The nuclear option is definitely a possibility, but it would be a disastrous move for the US to take. As Ted Postol explained in this interview, Iran already has sufficient material to construct atomic bombs. They don’t need any large facilities to do that, and they don’t need to test them ahead of time. This can be done in a tunnel with very little space. Around three atomics would basically end Israel, and they have enough material for around a dozen. The key part is that they can make them even after they’ve been nuked.

    But even leaving that aside, using of nuclear weapons in an unprovoked war of aggression would make the US a global pariah. It would be politically impossible even for other western countries to associate with the US at that point. On top of that, this would expose the US army as being incredibly weak in practice. If they have to reach for their ultimate weapon after only a month of fighting that means the US has very little conventional power. Russia is on the fourth year of war in Ukraine and they haven’t had to resort to nukes.

    The situation in Lebanon is very much dire though, and it seems like that’s gong to be up to Hezbollah with little support from Iran until the ceasefire collapses again.


  • Russia is obviously able to expand sales to more customers, and diversification makes sense as well. They don’t want to be reliant on one or two big customers here. Also, selling at a discount on spot market still brings in far more revenue than long term pipeline contracts with Europe did. Meanwhile, the west is literally facilitating a genocide in Gaza and people living in western countries have zero moral ground to bray about Russia at this point. Finally, not sure what these big efforts to transition away are exactly. So far, it’s pretty clear that Russia has done far more to transition away from Europe than the other way around.