As an American, I can’t say that I ever felt threatened by China. But by American Confederates? Definitely.

The problem isn’t inherent to AI. The issues are little different from the industrial revolution or robber barons, where industry is power, and the most malicious are ever grasping to obtain it.

0000

The solution isn’t to abandon AI, but for ordinary people to become masters of the technology. Every home server, allows a homestead to have understanding and agency over their tools. If enough individuals own their own AI, it would become possible to overcome the influence of corporations, such as community projects to provide AI utilities to their communities.

For example, say a phone app is developed and spread by a town. It’s purpose is to record receipts with a cellphone camera, and then the town’s AI analyzes it. Using comparisons of purchasing prices, it can detect whether pricing is being changed on a individual basis, or other shenanigans. This can help stem price fixing and other corruptions.

We, as a society, should use AI to help counter malicious actors and to provide helpful services.

The midterms will decide whether it is a troubled peace or a violent war that defines the next era of America.

I will keep speaking, and if it comes down to it, bear arms against tyrants.

While it is good that the Regime will lose many capable soldiers…I must say, this is lame and will feature as a WTF in history videos to come. We will literally have this as one of the many reasons why the Regime lost the 2nd American Civil War, if it comes down to it.

It is just weird and stupid. 🤷‍♂️

Anyone in a political position, should have a fixed income without any optional ways to make bank. If you work for the people, it should stay that way during and after your tenure.

The most hated, and probably the last of this United States. Odds are that we would have a new nation or many that would replace this abominable thing.

The Trump Regime as a whole is guilty for the murders of Pretti-Good. Hopefully we will see the whole lot of them do a jig, on a rope.

Personally, if the USA gets a complete overhaul, I think that there should be checks and balances through how each branch gets personnel. Furthermore, a fourth branch, the military, so that the executive isn’t in charge of that function.

The staffing concept goes something like this:

• Congress decides how many personnel the other branches can hire each year. Congress has to ask the judiciary, executive, and military branches to give them people to fill assorted roles as part of the congressional branch.

• The judiciary hires and trains bureaucrats and military commanders. After they have completed training, they are passed onto the executive, congressional, and military branches. Every so often, commanders and burecrats will have to be retrained by the judiciary.

• The executive will train ordinary soldiers, and release them into the service of the military. The executive also assigns logistical staff for the military, such as quartermasters, kitchen staff, and so on.

• Once a bureaucrat or military member is a certain age, they can either retire or continue their career working for the judiciary. As members of the judicial branch, these workers can serve as bailiffs, enforcement troops for court orders, be assigned to serve congress as support staff, and so on. This means the judicial has a relatively fewer bodies than other branches, but they are also the most experienced.

• The military can give the other branches defensive staff, such as cybersecurity experts, embassy guards, and so on.

Probably not perfect by any stretch, but the idea is to make it harder for any one branch to become “the” branch when it comes to human resources.

The red in the flag represents blood. Should the nation have a civil war, there will only be red.

It will be the choice of good people whether the stars and blue returns, or is replaced by something else entirely.

Any god that favors Trump, is a shitty one that only deserves rejection.

We have a rapist in office, who is almost certainly a Russian asset. Why should the rules selectively apply to Mamdani?

Because they don’t own the means of production, and the opposition has a monopoly on violence.

The base isn’t the same as the mogul constituents that the Democratic leadership cares about.

Hopefully, they aren’t installing more gas chambers to compensate. I am not kidding. 🫤

At the very least, the younger generation would have less lead to addle their brains.