“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them,” Sanders said.

“First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

“Will the big money interests and well-paid consultants who control the Democratic Party learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign?” Sanders asked.

“Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? Do they have any ideas as to how we can take on the increasingly powerful Oligarchy which has so much economic and political power? Probably not.”

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We don’t deserve Bernie. He’s to pure to be infected by being president. With that said, I’d give my left nut to see Bernie in the oval office

    The typo is staying just to annoy you grammar nazis. I know the difference in to, too, two. You can suck our collective too nuts

  • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would vote for Bernie in a heartbeat.

    He seems to always be on the right side of history, he understands the root causes of our national crises, and he has solutions.

    Problem: Two-party system, voter apathy.

    Solution: Ranked choice voting, remove electoral college (popular vote interstate compact).

    Problem: Bought elections.

    Solution: Repeal Citizens United.

    Problem: Federal deficit spending.

    Solution: Reform government contracts with private corpos so we’re not getting gouged. Repurpose military budget. Tax the rich.

    Problem: Ignorant and misinformed voting population.

    Solution: More school funding, pay teachers more.

    Problem: All surplus value is siphoned away from the working class.

    Solution: Tax incentives for employee-owned companies. More support for unions.

    Problem: Consumer price gouging.

    Solution: Break up monopolies, punish anti-competitive behavior.

    Problem: Irresponsible banking.

    Solution: Un-repeal Glass-Steagall.

    Problem: Expensive healthcare.

    Solution: Universal healthcare. Don’t even try to tell me we can’t afford it.

      • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think ranked choice voting and the popular vote interstate compact can happen at the state level. Just needs more local campaigning.

        Then people would feel more empowered to vote for who they really want. I think that would be a big push towards nominating an actual progressive candidate.

    • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Hey I just wanted to say that this is a great post. It really shows how little Hilary, Biden, and now Harris brought to the table

      It’s crazy how the DNC only wants to appeal to moderates, and Republicans cross the aisle, after witnessing how Trump performs

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      None of that stuff is going to happen, unfortunately, not while the Rs control everything. And it’s not official but it looks like they’re going to win the house too. So they’re going to run buckshot on this country with no one to stop them. They’ll control all 3 branches.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        None of it happened while Ds had any modicum of control either. Bernie represents what the democratic party should be, not what it is and has been. They pivoted hard to the status quo and we are footing the bill.

        • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I honestly feel like this must be how partys flip. The Democrats are the Republicans of the seventies, the new conservative party.

          Now, I’ll be the first to admit that the Republican party hasn’t exactly moved left, and is the biggest hole in my theory. Who knows maybe this populism will pave a path forward for them.

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            The Republican party has moved left in rhetoric. The promise to fix everything and put America first. Create all the jobs. The best economy!

            The will not do it. But that is irrelevant.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        not while the Rs control everything

        Uh, Bernie was blocked by the democrats, not the republicans.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think I agree with you about deficit spending because actually it’s not clear that some degree of a deficit is bad. The country does print its own money, so what you have written down in a spreadsheet might look scary but actually be less so.

      In other words, what’s true for a business or for an individual is often not true for a country that has its own mint.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Considering multiple blue states just voted against RCV, and the majority of the country voted to put even more ultra-conservative SCOTUS judges on the court, I’m not sure he is on the right side of history.

      History is being written right now, soon to be dictated by Donald Trump, and recorded through the lens of Donald Trump. What will the fascist schoolbooks written by the Texas board of education say to remember the people who stood up against Trump?

    • Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      We have a nascent left-wing movement in the local governments of many cities. It’s loose and relatively unorganized but it’s more than we’ve had in decades. Bernie’s run in 2016 has a lot to do with that.

      Our primary election turnout is abysmal, and Americans need to realize that the primaries are how the parties get reformed. Maybe the Democratic Party will have its Tea Party moment in 2026.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          At least this one will get everyone education, healthcare, housing, welfare and public transport.

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah. The Democrats really screwed the pooch on that one. He’s a solid candidate, and has stood on his moral stance from before the Democrats recognized the issues that are now popular.

      Sorely needed, sorely missed.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure he would have ran again even if Biden stepped down in the most graceful way possible to be honest. The second time he ran I remember him saying a large part of why he did was because people kept telling him how much they felt the country needed him, while he himself was having doubts on his ability to fill the office in his age, or weighing the amount of stress it would bring, and even looking at his vote totals and wondering if the country even wanted him as president. He’s gotta be tired, and my take on Sanders these past 8 years is if Trump didn’t exist he’d have been a happily retired grandpa, and he’s just trying to do whatever he thinks has the best chance to stop Trump and American Fascism in general. This perspective seems to make a lot of things line up including this verbal thrashing of his. He does have access to communication with top democratic play-makers, who knows how long hes been telling them something like this.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Genuinely feels like she cheated and won with zero consequences.

          Seems like that’s going around a lot these days.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              geez you weren’t kidding

              Several other Democrats who voted to censure Tlaib were among the top recipients of AIPAC funds in November, including Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz ($141,058) (link)

              and that was in January. If it’s any consolation, the evil is slowly draining her life away it seems.

              2016 : image 2023: image

  • ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Had Trump won in 2020, he’d have taken the fall for the Recession and Hyperinflation and it would have caused a 2008 effect. Populist Wave haulted, strangled in it’s crib by Coronachan.

    Had Trump won in 2020, he’d be done now and his VP would still be the democracy respecting Pence.

    Trump when elected in 2016 had no major plan and mostly left the employees of the state intact, and in 2020 the change was minimal. Now there’s a full blown scheme to control the government

    In 2020 they didn’t know how much they could get away with. They’ve seen the limits now.

    Winning in 2020 means no January 6th shattering the overton window and leading SCOTUS to some interesting choices about power.

    2020-2024 had one Supreme Court Justice to appoint. Now there’s another 2 if not 3

    In 2020 it would have been close. Now Democrats will have to regain ground, New Jersey New Hampshire and Minnesota are now Swing States.

    2016 Trump had his populist wave weakened by Gary Johnson and Evan McMulin who blocked the popular vote and kept states like Colorado and New Mexico out of his hands. 2016 Trump sucked with Hispanics. That initial wave would have burnt out with the COVID fuckery. Instead Democrats slotted in, took the 4 worst possible years, and are handing it back having effectively both given them another shot in the arm and crippled themselves. There goes the court. This isn’t John Kerry, it’s Carter.

    I’ve heard of 2020 hindsight, but this is ridiculous

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Imagine a time traveller appearing in 2020 and trying to convince everyone they needed to reelect Trump

  • generalpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This man has always cooked. I wish Dems had the ball to let him have the ticket both times he was snubbed despite cooking what needed to cooked.

  • grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They keep giving us candidates nobody fucking wants and keep being surprised when they lose

    And then it creates all this infighting where we’re all blaming each other for being Bernie bros or third party protest voters when in reality it’s the regular joes on the street who need to be convinced to give a fuck about their candidate, not terminally online hyperpolitical dweebs

    The democrats are just gonna keep losing and our climate is going to slip deeper and deeper past the point of no return. Earths climate, our political climate, our social fabric, all of it. Slowly but surely being pissed down the drain because Joe Biden thought he should run despite middling approval ratings and massive health concerns, leaving us with literally zero choice but to back Harris once he inevitably stepped down. Because we had so called “superdelegates” choosing our candidates for us in the 2016 election when we were actually able to finally build a massive grassroots movement spearheaded by the Sanders campaign.

    We’re gonna keep losing, and we’re gonna keep blaming each other, and the ruling class are just gonna keep sinking their claws deeper into what used to be ours.

    I’ll see you all again in four years, same time, same place, same fucking rigamarole

    • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s why I stopped voting altogether. Last time I voted in general elections was 2008. Last time I primaried was for Bernie in 16. Only time I ever donated money, too.

      Fuck the Democrats. They made it clear they want Republican voters more than than they want me

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s why I stopped voting altogether.

        Thanks for letting me no to never pay attention to anything you say.

        • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And thanks for not letting me pay attention to you. lol

          You really can’t keep blaming the voters guys, it the politician and surprise surprise you can can’t force an entire party’s nominee without a proper primary

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If they didn’t vote, they’re not a voter. Non-voters get their fair share of the blame, and non-voters who want to complain get shamed.

              • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                How I “want” you to vote is pragmatically. If you vote 3rd party in a FPTP election, you’re pragmatically indistinguishable from a non-voter.

                If you’re a leftist, the pragmatic strategy is to recognize the ratchet effect and vote for the “halt movement” party over the “full send fascism” party. It’s much easier to push leftist policies and promote leftist representatives under a neo-liberal regime than under a fascist one. At the absolute minimum the neo-liberals decelerate the plunge into fascism.

      • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t vote, don’t get to complain.

        Not saying that you have to vote when you dislike the options given. But you do have other options. Like spoiling your ballot, or nullify your ballot.

        Yes the results are the same, but by voting this way, you are actively participating in your democratic process. While not voting at all you are not. And if you do not participate, in my view, you cannot complain about the results.

        Oh and if you don’t know how, on election day just ask the poll workers. They should’ve been trained on how to handle it.

        • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Nullifying a ballot… So you say I should get off my sofa and go all the way to town to nullify my ballot?

          LOL no I’ll just sit at home and make liberals cry tears of anger while they feign enthusiasm for their dogshit candidate

    • SoJB@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Liberals seem to get real uppity when you remind them how actual holders of leftist beliefs in the general US population are almost nonexistent and all third party votes added together wouldn’t have saved Harris.

      Although if liberals were capable of using logic, they wouldn’t be liberals. You even see it in their hilarious Lemmy tantrums, they are genuinely so confused and lost.

      If only leftists were there saying exactly what they were doing wrong and exactly what would happen for literally the last four years.

      Oh wait. We were. Weird how Marx and Lenin continue to be proven right by history again and again.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them,” Sanders said in a statement Wednesday. “First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

    Dems 100% sold them out and assumed they’d still vote D as long as a handful of issues were different.

    The worse the Republicans got, the worse Dems got. Because they could get away with it and it increased donations.

    The thing is it just energizes republicans and depresses Dem turnout.

    If the goal is winning elections is a terrible strategy.

    If you only care about money and the election is just a grift to you tho, it’s a win/win. The result of the election doesn’t really matter.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      and now the ratchet effect will kick in again:

      “See? The people WANT the republicans. That’s why they keep electing republicans. Therefore, if we want to be competitive, we must become more like republicans.”

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There was never really that much risk of Dems losing voters to the Repubs (at least as long as Trump was the R candidate). The real damage came from Dems losing enthusiasm.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        This. I just had a very long argument with someone else that completely and utterly failed to grasp this simple concept. Trump ran as the most conservative conservative ever and his base loved him for it. Harris ran as the most conservative liberal ever and her base gritted their teeth and grudgingly trudged to the polls. And then the DNC is shocked and flabbergasted that they didn’t get a better turnout.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Centrists will never understand that when you run to the right, the right doesn’t buy it and the left believes you.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The thing that has driven me crazy for so long is this is the situation in America.

        There are 70M Americans that will vote Republican and nothing will ever change their minds

        There are 70M Americans that will vote Democrat and nothing will ever change their minds

        There are a couple million independent undecided voters that everyone goes after

        Then there are 100M+ people that sit out the election and no one seems to try to understand what would make them vote. It’s so crazy that we have just decided that there are red states and blue states and that’s how it is. A party that could retain some of either party while activating half the people that sit out would be a force to reckon with.

        As the Democratic Party has tried to find some way to win again they have gone after which group? The handful of independents and the 70M republicans that aren’t going to vote for them ever. And the people sitting it out probably aren’t looking for them to shift right, if so they would be republicans.

        • Hamartia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think this is a bit naive. Both partys will have done their homework and have a fairly good idea what it is those disenfranchised voters want. The problem is is what they want is at odds with what the party’s big donors want.

          • immutable@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Naive is the Democratic party’s current position of favoring those donors over voters.

            I understand that they’ve done a cynical calculus and decided to leave those voters on the sidelines. It is a failing strategy that successfully got them billions of dollars and lost the election.

            It is not that I do not understand the deeper reason, it is that I reject it as a failure.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      To be fair, they should’ve voted Dem, but instead sat out against their own best interest.

      The electorate is incredibly fucking stupid.

      The strategy made sense to anyone with half a brain. It seems I overestimated the median American, though.

      • DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re right. Lot of people sat out because of inflation, which was driven by corporate greed, which of course a Republican is not going to address. The electorate needs a fucking education. Prices have stopped climbing aggressively. They’re not going to go back down. Wage growth is the next step, which is another thing a Republican will not address. Americans cutting off their nose to spite their face.

        • generalpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Dems had 3 years and change to address insane profiteering and price gouging that started with COVID “supply chain issues” which was wrapped under the guise of inflation and record profits. Where’s that bill again?

          Kamala made 1 mention of a plan to scrutinize this issue and then backed down because of some potential backlash.

          There’s education and there’s gaslighting. Your point is the latter.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Remind me again when Biden had a supermajority in Congress?

            Edit: That’s what I thought.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Then their job was to be sure we all knew they were not ignoring it even if there was little they could do.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Rings a bit hollow. Biden stood up for unions, did not interfere with strikes, and always sided with the worker.

    The other party… celebrating layoffs, cutting the fat, blocking unions.

    So sure, maybe they could be better. But to say they abandoned the American worker, thats a bit of a stretch.

    Love Bern, but right now he’s playing Monday morning QB.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      My guy, Biden blocked a railroad workers strike because it endangered corporate interests, and he didn’t give them a key piece they were asking for: paid sick leave.

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I agree, optics matter to the public and media.

            The media has sane washed an insane old person, while negatively spinning or outright ignoring any Biden accomplishment.

            The fact is, in this system, we’re trying to convince a small group of undecided folks in a few swing states to get involved and make a choice.

            The majority of the public is too tired and busy to bother to review the facts, and happy to watch an opinion of the matter - whether it’s true or not.

            If it fits into their world-view there’s no need to challenge it.

            • hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, that undecided group does not exist, this election clearly demonstrated that. Trump results are nearly identical to 2020. What exists are people who are not engaged or disalusioned. They also are poor and going to vote is a meaningful event that takes energy that they don’t have.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah, you’re acting in bad faith here too.

                The numbers of votes clearly show over 24 million people sat out 2024 vs 2020.

                Undecided doesn’t mean they’ll make a decision on voting day.

                I know of several people who willingly sat out because the state they’re in was always decided and they didn’t feel it would matter.

                • hglman@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  You just said exactly what I said while also saying im acting in bad faith.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          4, not the 7 they wanted or deserved. he doesn’t get any credit for this. he broke the strike weakening their position.

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m partially agreeing, I want to point out that they did get 7 days allotted.

            Not all 7 of those are from sick time, so you’ve got a point.

            I find it a reach to say the administration gets no credit when it’s definitely been assigned to them on multiple fronts for the effort.

            Congress was involved here too. Do you think our president should be a despot?

            Were you directly involved in negotiations?

            The people who were directly involved, gave the Biden administration credit for an assist.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Dig deeper the people who gave credit were the same members who didn’t support the strike in the first place. iirc.

              I blame everyone involved who voted to break the strike. don’t try to assert for me things I havent asserted.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                So you don’t acknowledge when you’re wrong, and will continue to move goalposts. You’re taking a defensive posture.

                It’s becoming clear now.

                You’re a bad faith actor.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You’re of course welcome to continue believing that. Thats of course your prerogative. But I’m just going to point to the results since they speak for themselves.

                  Harris is missing 20million votes. You were warned and decided that arguing with me about the lesser evil ‘optimal voting strategy’ than realizing the danger harris was putting you in was a good idea. 👍 Good job. Now go convince those 20million other individuals since you’ve failed here.

                  You know what they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink. (I know you struggle with analogies, you’re the 🐴)

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.

    Goddamn this hits the exact thing that Democrats really need to learn.

    There’s a ton of emotion in this nation. Given:

    • The opioid crisis where the people responsible are in perpetual litigation.
    • The wars we fought that costed us deaths of young people who had lives ahead of them, and scarred millions more. All so that a few rich asshats could profit.
    • The corruption of large companies as they swindle the working class, only to watch legislators continue to profit off of insider trading.

    And that’s just to name a few. There’s a ton of emotion in this nation. And Trump, for better or worse, taps into that emotion. The cut and dry democrats, they keep telling us, “The system will work, this time” and you have a public that just screams “well how soon is now then?”

    Democrats cannot just keep tapping on the system as it currently stands when the system so obviously doesn’t deliver. There are hungry democrats looking for change to the system to form a more better system that will serve them, and the party just keeps dressing the bones of the long gone bird from days long pass.

    Sanders fucking sinks the nail in a single stroke of the hammer on this. And Republicans are using that emotion, that pent up distrust of the system as it is, to move people in their direction. The entire point of this living government is to have a government, to have a system, that matches the people who are alive and having to deal with it. Sanders sees that and cut and dry Democrats keep going “but Trump will ruin the system that doesn’t work for you!!”

    Goddamn, one day, they will learn. Democrats will pick up on what Sanders is saying one day. But holy shit, they are going to clearly take an incredibly long and winding road to get there. I don’t agree with where Republicans want to take us. I don’t agree with how Republicans want to get there. But goddamn, we’ve got to hand it to them that they’re actively pointing out the exact same thing the Sanders is pointing out. “Status Quo ain’t going to fucking work anymore.” The sooner the traditional Democrats learn that, the faster they can come back to being relevant.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tbh, unless Wasserman-Schultz and the other imbecilic DNC royalty step down or are made to fuck all the way off somehow, I don’t think the Democratic Party is going to recover from this. And in that case, frankly, they shouldn’t recover. This result is absolutely, unambiguously damning.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Again with this talk about strategy as if any of it is going to matter in 3 months when they start executing people

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Almost like he could have saved this whole scenario in 2016. Fuckin DNC kiss the ring Hillary bullshit.

    • Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      At this point I’d be in favor of him just starting a podcast and enjoying retirement. The left has to go around the DNC to effectively deliver their message, it’s foolish to think otherwise.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The dnc should all fall on their sword politically and admit that it would been better today had they given being their blessing and support when it would have mattered.

        Then give Bernie power in the dnc to craft the future of the party. Find a new direction while there’s still time

        • Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          He’s 83. It’s best for him to leverage his celebrity than to really hunker down with an administrative role. If Trump can find true believers best believe the good guys can.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s cute to read all of these comments attempting to strategize without realizing that it’s all moot in a P2025 world.

          We are fucked. It’s too late to discuss realigning for “the next election,” because there will never be a (fair) one ever again.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Yeah. I am. What is your point?

              If you or anyone else thinks what I’m saying is hyperbolic, then I want you to remember this exchange in 6 to 12 months.

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                If germany is an ally today the US then its never too late to keep fighting.

                But you are absolutely entitled to feel like its pointless. Its not true, one might even say there has never been a fair election since the creation of the electoral college.

                To say there will never be another fair election is hyperbolic.

                I’ve probably got another 35 years, 67 more if im really lucky, you will have to give me more than 6 to 12 months.

                I genuinely hope this doesnt cause a new civil war or worldwar. But im not willing to bet it isnt a precipice that has just been driven past, im waiting for a fall

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I’ve probably got another 35 years, 67 more if im really lucky

                  That seems like a really big spread. I’ve probably got another 30, but nowhere near 60 even if I"m really lucky, unless I’m like “statistical outlier” lucky.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  You do know what had to happen to Germany for it to become what it is after WW2, right?

                  It was basically destroyed, and the allies rebuilt it. That shit ain’t happening again.

      • iwndwyt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        In related news:

        In June 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for violating the DNC Charter by rigging the Democratic presidential primaries for Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders. Even former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid admitted in July 2016, “I knew—everybody knew—that this was not a fair deal.”

  • Lemmy_Cook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Like I give a fuck about whatever Bernie says at a time like this. Shut up and stop acting like you know what’s best for us, this is some fine Monday morning QB that’s completely unhelpful. Come at me Bernie bros.

    Edit: Looks like the Bernie Bros do know how to vote after all! Just not where it matters. Shame on those who sat out the election in 2016 and 2024 to enable the slide towards fascism. Shame on those who didn’t vote because of Gaza. Gaza and Ukraine are fucked now because of people like you. You do not have the moral high ground. Keep the downvotes coming, it means I struck a nerve. Shame on you. I sincerely hope the leopards come for you first.

      • Lemmy_Cook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s a great one! Hmm, let’s see what do you call a leftist who sits out the vote?

        Complicit.

        See, it’s not really funny after all.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, yeah, I think that’s unironically who they want to listen to. They’re waiting for someone to tell them why the choices the party made were actually good and smart and how all the left punching they did was actually justified. I’m not sure they’re going to get it, though; even the Pod Save America guys sounded on the verge of some self-reflection. But who knows, maybe they’ll blame Russian disinformation campaigns again and put their heads back in the sand.