‘Legally carrying a firearm is not the same as brandishing a firearm,’ the former Georgia congresswoman wrote

Marjorie Taylor Greene has urged fellow MAGA supporters – and other Americans – to “take off their political blinders” over the death of protester Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, warning that they are being “incited into civil war.”

“I unapologetically believe in border security and deporting criminal illegal aliens and I support law enforcement,” Greene wrote on X Sunday, the day after the fatal shooting. “However, I also unapologetically support the 2nd amendment.

“Legally carrying a firearm is not the same as brandishing a firearm.”

Despite video showing that 37-year-old Pretti was filming federal officers but did not have a weapon drawn, the Trump administration has claimed he had tried to assassinate agents in an act of “domestic terrorism.”

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    What is being missed here is

    EVEN MARGERY TAYLOR GREEN IS GETTING SUPPORT BY TELLING THE TRUTH

    which leads us to ask

    DEMOCRATS IN OFFICE, WHY IS THIS SO HARD?!?!?!

  • cravl@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I can’t help but read MTG as Magic the Gathering and it makes these headlines kinda sorta bearable.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    For a rat jumping off a sinking ship, she’s pretty good at it tbh. She is very selective and has only gone against trump on two things from what I understand (Epstein and 2A), both probably hitting the mark even in cultish Maga territory.

  • Rhoeri@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    She’s nothing more than a bilge-rat, sensing the ship is sinking and escaping to higher decks.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yes to the first part. However, disagree on the last bit…I mean, is anything actually sinking that isn’t wanted and expected by the paedo in chief?
      And I’m asking seriously here.

      I don’t see any sinking of the republican party or maga. I see an old orange child rapist shitting on the fundamental allies, institutions, and laws of america with no one stopping it from happening.
      Yes, america is losing those long time allies and money, etc, BUT that is by design of the wannabe dictator and its enablers. Again, where’s the sinking?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Bitch, you created this monster. Now that you finally nfpund your marbles, it’s a bit late, dontbya think? I’m all for a redemption arc, but you really were one of the worst.

    It’ll take more from you to forget what you’ve done

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They didn’t even really throw her out until she got salty over not running for senate (which they told her ‘no’ cuz she’d have lost.)

  • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    this the same idiot who was calling for a ‘national divorce’ every other week? as if that wasn’t just a euphemism for civil war

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My guess is she is a survivor of child sexual assault and the Epstein files broken her anti-empathy.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I actually agree with her on that. But yeah she says all sorts of other stupid hateful shit.

      But whatever we need as many cracks in the MAGA cult logic as we can get. And they sure as hell won’t listen to me.

    • Abundance114@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      National divorse is in no way a euphemism for civil war. There’s literally a constitutional way of states removing themselves from the Federal Government, that’s what national divorse means.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        National divorse

        constitutional way of states removing themselves from the Federal Government

        that’s what national divorse means

        Not from here, huh. Well, that’s alright. 1860 wasn’t the same everywhere around the world, of course.

        • Abundance114@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          A convention of states to amend the constitution; explicitly saying that specific state is no longer apart of the U.S., or inserting another legal route of succession into the constitution.

          Much easier, and at the same time much more difficult than civil war.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            A convention of states to amend the constitution;

            Uh, no. That’s not a constitutional way of states removing themselves from the federal government; that’s a constitutional way to amend the constitution.

            And why would we want to? I am so fucking proud of Minnesota right now you can’t begin to imagine. Why would I want them to leave? They are arguably the very best of us.

            No, the one that needs to leave is the orange chancre and his minions. Why are you not talking about that? Minnesota’s not the problem here.

            inserting another legal route of succession into the constitution.

            Another? I’m still waiting to see the first.

            • Abundance114@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That’s not a constitutional way of states removing themselves from the federal government; that’s a constitutional way to amend the constitution.

              Is it constitutional to amend the constitution? Then how is that not a constitutional way?

  • bruhbeans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    People need to stop acting like she’s turned over a new leaf. She’s a crazy racist. She has nothing to say that’s worth hearing. She did more than most to put us where we are. She belongs in the sea.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah people don’t become non racist in a couple months. The best case scenario is that she actually has no ideology, was using racism to extend her support base and now is trying to switch sides because she wasn’t accepted as a top level member to the racist boys’ club (suprise suprise they also turned out to be sexist).

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Her saying this is better than her not saying anything at all—we can demand more from her but we can also benefit from her existence at the moment since she isn’t staying silent

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      She’s a crazy racist

      Do you realize need someone to explain to you why trump losing the support of crazy racists is a big deal?

      • suddenlyme@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This. The way forward is this. Her audience needs to hear this. Not us on Lemmy, we already know.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It boils down to a simplified “us versus them” attitude that the wealthy exploit regardless of party.

          No one should agree with anyone 100% of the time, because then you’re just blindly agreeing and not thinking.

          But people who view the world as binary teams like that can’t rationalize any of “them” saying anything right.

          Right now it’s very important to remember because fascists are always dogshit at maintaining a coaltion after assuming power. Divide and conquer is cliche for a reason, it fucking works.

          We need to hammer the 2A angle, because 2A is a huge chunk of Republican support. That’s one of their top wedge issues.

          Pro-gun progressives could always dominate any election, but even more so now that the left should understand how important gun rights are. And we’d still cut down on mass shootings, because people would feel like they have something to lose in the first place.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Look, yes. She’s a piece of shit. But she’s not wrong here. And honestly, we need people (even batshit crazy racists) calling out the stupid shit Trump and co are doing.

      Do not conflate agreement with acceptance. We need all the help we can get right now. Worry about washing your hands later. Too many good people are dying to stay on that high horse.

    • Xenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      At this current point in time, anybody against Trump in this fascist regime is a friend of mine

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I understood your point perfectly fine. I’m telling you that the r word, in the way you used it, is an ableist slur.

            • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              12 hours ago

              My argument was specifically that she was pretending to be intellectually deficient, the true meaning of the word that I’m apparently not allow to post. It is not, inherently, an “ableist slur.”

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Doesn’t matter if the intent is to cause a civil war or not. We don’t have a choice.

    They will keep ramping up until we fight back. May as well start it now before more lives are lost.

    I know Trump thinks it’s going to keep there from being primaries, midterms, but he’s wrong.

    It’s also not going to stop us from demanding the Epstein files.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I swear to God if this BS act works and people vote for this unprincipled scumbag in 2028, I’m going to stick my head in a trash compactor.