Then we are good.
Hopefully.
Then we are good.
Hopefully.
Would you say that it reads better as “not x” or “x not” (if we remove all special characters)?
I am kinda hearing what you are saying, but it also sounds quite depressing.
It is likely you are a bot, and then you get one it these regular captchas and the that will increase your score if you succeed.*
Look at me, I have free toilet paper at work.
From the Wikipedia page it seems that there are small outbreaks every year in the region of origin (India/Malaysia). It seems like the government is quite good at tracking down infected and potentially infected - which is lucky since the mortality rate is above 50%! I wonder what happens if one of the infected jumped on a plane to a completely different place in the world that was not so good at managing it.
I would like to share this with you: https://youtu.be/U0YW7x9U5TQ
It somehow disappears when I close my private browser.
Let me take a stab at it:
Problem: Given two list of length n, find what elements the two list have in common. (we assume that there are not duplicates within a single list)
Naive solution: For each element in the first list, check if it appears in the second.
Bogo solution: For each permutation of the first list and for each permutation of the second list, check if the first item in each list is the same. If so, report in the output (and make sure to only report it once).
Sounds like you should find a new product to use.
And how long you watched
To be fair, this is a classical strategi in startups called “wizard of Oz prototyping” - it is used to test if there is a market for something before the tech is ready. But the tech is supposed to be created soon after and actually work…
Makes me realize I haven’t seen a dickbutt in years.
But if you want to know your saving, you will need to dust off the old formula. And if you do, you find the maximum saving to be around 41% (in the case of isosceles right triangle where the hypotenuse is a factor of sqrt 2 shorter).
Always has been
Well, according to the first biography about him, he was coding quite a lot in Zip2 and perhaps also some in early PayPal. Bit the code was supposedly hastily written and very bad.
I will give you an upvote for maintaining critical thinking, but I will say that the book is not that bad. And it is really well written and interesting, but might be favoring SBF more than other books. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
Read “Going Infinite” which describes the rise and tall of FTX and SBF. “isn’t smart” is not true, but he is definitely not “human smart”, but rather “math smart”.
The newly elected government is actually quite cost efficient in this regard. Since they already are all crooked business men, they don’t need to pay anyone to get those tax laws passed.