• 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Many believe Harris lost in 2024 because voters viewed her as too progressive, and that Ocasio-Cortez could face the same problem.

    Who’s this “many”? Kamala lost because of her Joe Biden neolib policies, her hard heel-turn to the right, and her “nothing will change, we are the most lethal military” stance on the Middle East.

    Instead of reassuring the masses who she thought were a shoe-in, she tried to appease the “I’ll never vote for a black woman” crowd, which alienated the former and would never have worked on the latter.

    It was either the greatest miscalculation ever, lead by Third Way focus groups, or someone tugged the leash. Either way, with the GOP rat fucking that was almost certainly happening to some degree.

    Pretty shitty of Newsweek to pretend that progressive policies are unpopular with a majority of Americans.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      She came out look ling like Darth vader in one of the televised things she did and did the war hawk dance. Fuck off forever, you lost to Donald Fucking Trump after spending 1.5 billion.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure it was the opposite. I still voted for her cause Trump was worse. But I felt then like I do now. She’s a Republican. Her policies are conservative and Republican.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Personally, I think it is because there was no Democratic Party primary. Biden stole the time that any potential candidate could have used to prove their mettle to voters.

    • starik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are many contradictory opinions on why Harris lost. These opinions usually boil down to “Her policy positions weren’t close enough to my policy positions, and that’s why she lost.”

    • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      DNC has already shown they aren’t taking that as the lesson learnt. They won’t even release the 2024 autopsy cause they don’t like what it says

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No, she lost because she was black and a woman. People always underestimate just how racist and sexist the US is. Don’t fall into this trap.

      • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        A THIRD of people, only slightly smaller than the third that voted for Trump, voted for Harris based on the fact that she WASN’T TRUMP. Another third didn’t vote because they felt her stance on Israel wasn’t enough to offset that she wasn’t Trump. I don’t feel it had anything to do with her race or gender.

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The polls say otherwise. She was leading after her announcement, when she was still talking about healthcare reform, economic justice, taxing the rich, etc. For about three weeks.

        Then she talked to her business rep corpo brother, and shifted gear to espousing pro-corporate policy, defending the wealthy, calling leftists Bernie bros, etc, and fell behind.

        I agree that Palestine made little difference, btw. It cost her around half a million votes, but she lost by three times that. That’s looking at state by state, too.

        She lost because she turned herself into Biden 2, instead of what people wanted her to be, which was Obama (until he became President. He lied very well, then governed well enough that we forgave him for being friends with the corps).

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You couldn’t mention her name around here without a bandwagon of “She’s the literal genocide queen and a vote for her is a vote to murder Palestinian children.”

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          But “around here” is representative of what? 5% of voters? 16% of democratic voters max? Let’s not pretend Lemmy users represent a sizable number of democratic voters.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Since you mentioned the name, I did notice quite obviously the disrespect everyone had toward Kamala Harris in the news and online comments simply due what they called her.

          Almost everywhere, it was quite common for people to refer to her as Kamala and not Harris.

          I suspect it was either due to her being a woman, or due to her being Indian (Kamala sounds a lot more foreign than Harris).

          It was always “Kamala vs Trump” never Harris vs Trump or Kamala vs Donald.

      • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s possible that it she was a white man, and absolutely nothing else was different, that she very well might have just barely eeked out a victory. That’s still a failure. It should have been a blowout. It was a failure of a campaign, racism and sexism against the candidate by the general public was a component, but the least relevant one.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yeah. Her argument was that she was Joe Biden, but younger and more diverse. But Joe Biden was LOSING. Even before his debate performance. And he only barely won in 2020, which also should have been a blowout.

          It’s not the blackness or the femaleness, it’s doubling down on shitty uninspiring politics. An old white male Joe Biden was going to lose even worse than the middle aged black female Joe Biden.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I agree, even if Biden was 20 years younger I think he would have won. If he was 20 years younger and female and Indian he would have lost just as Harris did.

          It was definitely policy that hindered them, but also the sexism and racism.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No, she lost because she was black and a woman.

        “Kamala Harris ran the perfect campaign, she was just stabbed in the back!”