Apparently she started before it happened. Maybe she really was self-aware enough to see what Trump’s endgame would be.

Yeah, that’s why it’s in quotes.

“I would like to say, humbly, I’m sorry for taking part in the toxic politics; it’s very bad for our country,” Greene said. “It’s been something I’ve thought about a lot, especially since Charlie Kirk was assassinated.”

Huh, I didn’t consider that might be a reason for her “change of heart.” Was the first time she started saying things that made sense after he was shot?

Oh, so you’re the reason he had that fall lately! Good.

He doesn’t need the support of the people now that he’s already in power

Ah, but he does, because Republicans who do need their support to stay in power look to them when deciding to bend over to Dear Leader. None of them actually like him. He’s only immune from consequences because Republicans allow it. If enough of his cult turned on him, they would as well. Not saying it’s going to happen, only that it’s a possibility.

IF anything happens to him, it will be because he has eroded the trust of his conspiracy theorist cult by trying to cover up his pedophilia more than the pedophilia itself. A lot of his power is derived from his cult, which the Republicans are terrified of alienating. If he loses enough of their support, Republicans won’t be so hell-bent on protecting him at all costs. It’s a big “if.”

I don’t know that it would be, but he sure seems to think so. I think him trying so desperately to cover it up for so long has made it more damaging than it would have been if he’d just owned it when his cult was clamoring for the files to be released. He’d downplay it with his usual word salad, news articles would be written about how terrible it was, and nothing of consequence would happen to him. Now, though? It’s not just about the horrendous crimes, but his betrayal of his conspiracy theorist cult. Maybe it would still amount to nothing, but he hasn’t done himself any favors by alienating his cultists.

Would be difficult to use the actual documents to pick and choose only Democrats to prosecute while protecting Republicans. Might as well just make everything up at at that point.

Sucking a guy’s dick isn’t a crime, but sex with a minor sure is.

Yes, it was Douglas Adams, first published in The Salmon of Doubt.

it would be illegal

What could be more appropriate for a Trump coin than that?

There is no factual basis or credible reporting from authoritative news sources or public records to support the claim that Donald Trump performed a sex act on Bill Clinton.

The search results discuss various political rumors, social media speculation, and unrelated news stories concerning both individuals, including the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein email releases. However, none of these sources contain evidence for the specific act mentioned in the user’s question. The suggestions found in online forums and social media are entirely speculative and lack any factual verification.

It did mention “Jeffery Epstein email releases” in passing, but it should have given that specific email as to where the rumor came from. Definitely more vague than was reasonable to be.

It just said to me that there wasn’t any conclusive proof that it happened, which is true.

On Friday morning, as the uproar continued, Trump declared that he would instead ask the Department of Justice to investigate Epstein’s ties with Democrats, not Republicans, singling out Bill Clinton, Larry Summers and Reid Hoffman. Trump also paradoxically referred to the “Epstein hoax” and called it a “scam”.

He’s trying to only implicate Bill, at least.

I wish we could use photosynthesis, even if it’s just as a supplement like a hybrid vehicle.

But that’s due to some sort of injury or disorder, not how they function standard.