I tried with Mistral:
Lmao here’s what Proton’s Lumo said:
Walking (moderate pace) | ~5 km/h) | ~1 minute | Low physical effort; you’ll arrive slightly sweaty, which can actually help pre‑wet the car.
all those answers read like upvoted answers on reddit
we are being goofed on by RAM
going forward I’m going to assume that we have a very very sarcastic AI situation
if you’re 100m from the carwash, why did you not wash the car while driving on the way to parking? THINK MARK THINK
I just did tried in ChatGPT and it said „Walk“. But at the bottom it added: The only reason to drive would be: You need to move the car there directly for washing and can’t push.
If you can push, push!
I need all the fossil fuels for myself, slave!“and can’t push” 😭
Indeed
To drive 100m in 10s you’d need to accelerate hard to 20m/s (45 mph or 72 km/h) within 5 seconds and then start braking equally hard half way.
!theydidthemath
https://mastodon.world/@knowmadd/116072773118828295
For those who want more
Just a heads up for anyone who may use this in an argument. I just tested on several models and the generated response accounted for the logical fallacy. Unfortunately it isn’t real.
( Funny non-the less )
Tested on GPT-5 mini and it’s real tho?
Edit: Gemini gives different results
Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google’s lawyers really don’t want that to be the case.
Gemini got jokes, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor.
Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope
Those gemini responses are legitimately hilarious.
Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is “You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it”.
I don’t need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don’t need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don’t need pros and cons. And I definitely don’t need a verdict.
I’ll also accept sarcasm.
“Unless you’ve successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you’re probably going to have to drive.”
Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that
It’s the illusion of reason
I’ve found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol
Gemini’s responses were surprisingly humorous
I used paid models which will be the only ones the LLM bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising
( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a LLM nut )
It’s basically impossible to tell with these between the example being totally fabricated, true but only happens some small percentage of time, true and happens most of the time but you got lucky, and true and reliable but now the company has patched this specific case because it blew up online.
Well done, you managed to find a picture of someone else’s comment added to a third person’s joke,l and you took it seriously. What a great bastion of critical thinking you are!
