

under the false impression that being at war means he can stay in office no matter what (despite his entire life being filled with counterexamples)
Tbf it’s working for Netanyahu


under the false impression that being at war means he can stay in office no matter what (despite his entire life being filled with counterexamples)
Tbf it’s working for Netanyahu
Anthropic making a lot of noise of being the victim of large scale distillation attacks (ie other AI firms, usually Chinese copying/scraping their model), but people have pointed out the hypocrisy that Anthropic themselves seems to have copied DeepSeek.
If you bypass the system prompt and ask Claude what model it is (e.g. via Open router), it’ll reply that it’s DeepSeek.

(Also I know, eww Reddit and X)
Claude sonnet 4.6 says it’s DeepSeek when system prompt is empty : r/DeepSeek - https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek/comments/1rd5jw7/claude_sonnet_46_says_its_deepseek_when_system/
Claude Sonnet 4.6 distilled DeepSeek? : r/DeepSeek - https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek/comments/1r9se7p/claude_sonnet_46_distilled_deepseek/


Yep, US citizenship is one of the most expensive in the world, due to their uniquely harsh taxation of expats.


Actually, with the exception of the crown, none of the jewellery had much gold


Usual suspects
It heavily depends on the frontend. Most cheat, and actually pre-process “simple” prompts and redirect them to non-thinking models, even if you select “thinking.” It also doesn’t also help that most frontends are jank af and have removed the thinking button.
Kimi happened to be the best model I had access to, but even more well-known models like GPT 5 Mini crash out. Gemini and Claude in particular lie and don’t actually show the full thinking, just a summarised version of it.
Sadly don’t have access to “better” models to test further.
GPT 5 Mini:
Thinking
Hmmm...
Providing transportation guidance
The user is asking whether to walk or drive to a car wash that's 100m away. I need to consider factors like time, energy, environmental impact, weather, traffic, and parking. Since it's such a short distance, walking might actually be quicker, taking about 1-2 minutes. Driving would involve warming up the engine and finding parking. Walking is likely faster and more eco-friendly, but if the car is already inside, that changes things!
Evaluating transportation options
If you drive, you'll need to park or find the entrance, which can be a hassle. I should also consider the weather—if it’s rainy or cold, that might impact your choice. If you're carrying heavy items or have kids, it could sway the decision too. A simple rule: if you want to save time and the weather is fine, walking is likely faster. But if the car wash requires you to drive in, that changes everything!
Clarifying car wash logistics
When thinking about a typical car wash, there are generally two types: places where you stay in your car and drive through, and others where you drop off your car and then walk away. Since the car wash is 100m away, if it requires you to drive in, walking isn’t an option. The user mentioned the distance and wants to know whether to walk or drive, but if they need to wash the car, they likely have to drive it there!
Addressing car wash details
Some car wash facilities may charge extra if you drive in, and usually, you need to take your car to get it washed. If you walk instead, you can’t necessarily have your car cleaned. This situation is a bit unclear—it’s about distance rather than the process itself. To clarify, I could ask whether the user really needs to drive their car there. The answer depends on the user's needs for washing the car versus simply walking!
Determining the best way to the car wash
I need to consider that most car washes require you to drive your car there, especially if it’s a service for washing. If you walk the 100m, you can’t get your car washed since you’d leave it behind. The user is asking if they should walk or drive. I should clarify: if you want to wash your car, driving is necessary, but if you just plan to walk for other reasons, then that’s different. So, if the goal is washing the car, driving is the way to go!
Clarifying the car wash decision
If you want to clean your car at a wash, you’ll need to drive it to the facility, as walking won’t accomplish that. Here’s a simple breakdown:
Short answer: Drive there.
Reasons:
You must bring your car to have it washed.
100m is a short distance, but driving ensures you can enter the wash.
If you want to walk to get supplies or check the queue, you can, but you still need to drive for the wash. And if weather is bad or you’re in a hurry, driving is more convenient.
Are you planning to have your car washed at the facility?
Depends on the front end and specific model, but usually you can tap the arrow/thinking to view the internals of reasoning/thinking models.
E.g. for Kimi 2.5 reasoning I got this:
The most straightforward interpretation: The user needs to take their car to the car wash. It's 100m away. Should they:
- Drive the car there (100m drive)
- Walk there (but then the car stays home, so they can't wash it)
This seems like a non-question unless I'm missing something. Perhaps they mean they will walk alongside the car? Like push it? That's possible but silly.
Or perhaps "car wash" refers to a self-service coin-operated bay, and they are wondering if they should drive the car 100m to that bay, or walk there (meaning leave the car home and just... go there for no reason? Or perhaps they have a hose at the car wash station they can use? No, that doesn't make sense).
Given the constraints of the prompt (professional, neutral tone, encyclopedia-like, concise), I should provide a direct answer:
You must drive the car to the car wash, as transporting a vehicle requires driving (or pushing) it. However, for a distance of only 100 meters, driving represents a short trip that may not allow the engine to reach optimal operating temperature, potentially leading to incomplete fuel combustion and moisture accumulation in the oil and exhaust system. Despite this, it is the only practical method to transport the vehicle.
Alternatively, if the question implies walking alongside the car (pushing it), this is physically possible for 100 meters but generally impractical compared to driving.
If the question is about whether to walk home after dropping off the car, or walk there to pick it up later, walking is clearly superior for such a short distance.
But I think the core confusion is: you cannot wash your car at a car wash 100m away without taking the car there. Therefore, you must drive (or push). Driving is the standard method.
So the answer is: Drive, as you must transport the vehicle to the facility. Walking is not feasible unless pushing the vehicle, which is impractical. Note that such a short drive is suboptimal for engine health but unavoidable in this scenario.
But wait, is there any interpretation where they walk? Maybe if they have a mobile detailer at the car wash location and they walk there to meet them, then walk back with them to the car? No, that's convoluted.
Or if it's a full-service place where they come out and get your car? Then you could walk there to hand over keys, but you'd still need to get the car there somehow (maybe they send a driver?). But that's overthinking.
Stick to the straightforward answer.
One more check: The user might be asking whether to drive through an automatic car wash (staying in the car) versus walking through a self-service bay. But at 100m, the drive-through option is... just the drive there. The wash itself is stationary.
Actually, maybe they mean: "The car wash facility is 100m away. Should I drive my car there to get it washed, or should I walk there [and do something else - perhaps use a hand wash station without my car]?" But that doesn't make sense with "I need to wash my car."
Okay, I'm confident the answer is "Drive, because you need to bring the car with you."
Formatting:
- Shorter paragraphs for mobile
- No conclusion section
- No follow-up questions
- See also section with related terms
Related terms: short trip driving, engine warm-up, vehicle maintenance, car wash types (self-service, automatic, detailing).
Confidence Score: 95%
Sources: General automotive engineering knowledge regarding internal combustion engine operation and lubrication systems (e.g., [SAE International](https://www.sae.org/) standards on engine testing).
Let me verify the short trip claim. Yes, short trips where engines don't reach operating temperature (typically 80-90°C coolant temp) lead to:
1. Fuel dilution of oil (unburned fuel washing past rings into crankcase)
2. Water condensation in oil and exhaust not burning off
3. Increased wear due to clearances not being at design spec until warmed
4. Reduced efficiency of catalytic converter until warm
This is well-established.
So the answer is solid.
Lmao if you try it with a reasoning model it crashes out with >3 pages of “thinking” trying to deal with the inherent contradiction


Play stupid games win stupid prizes


On the one hand, the founding fathers were tasked with constructing an entire political system before the fields of game theory and political science even existed to tell them the fragility of their checks and balances.
On the other, they also had very particular opinions about who were even eligible to participate in their new system (read: land owning whites).


Kagi also has SlopStop. Basically sponsorblock but for AI slop.
SlopStop | Kagi’s Docs - https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/slopstop.html


The default experience depends on what you’re searching for, usually traditional search engines fall apart pretty quickly when it comes to anything related to a possible purchase, or more technical/esoteric info.
Tbf, one of Kagi’s killer features is its ability to up/down rank websites, which means you also need to spend some time customising it to your tastes. No more Pinterest, quora, medium, etc


Microsoft Tay
Tay, Microsoft’s AI chatbot, gets a crash course in racism from Twitter | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai-chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter




Inb4 Trump places tariffs on and sues the UN
Inb4 conservatives change from
“Mary was a teenager”
to
“The Founding Fathers were pedophiles too”
Heartbreaking: cancer diagnosed with Mitch McConnell


US laws: money is speech
People: OK, we’ll just choose to not spend money with those we dislike
US laws: that’s illegal
(Anti BDS laws)


When can we evict Israel Without Borders from Gaza?
It’s janky AF mess.
Internally the copilot key is hard coded to be meta + shift + f23. If you don’t recognise what the f23 key is, that’s because it was last featured over four decades ago on the IBM model M.
The fact that Microsoft has decreed that the Copilot key must send this exact shortcut of three different keys makes it very difficult to remap consistently.
Most keyboard remapping software (SharpKeys) work best at remapping single keys, not shortcuts. Windows users can use PowerToys to remap this three key shortcut, if you try to use it normally as a right ctrl, e.g. rctrl lshift p it doesn’t work consistently.
I suspect it might be because you’re essentially trying to send a whopping five keycodes for a shortcut, when most programs already struggle to handle 4.
Linux users were similarly out of luck until early last year, when most desktop environments fixed up the key codes.
Copilot key is based on a button you probably haven’t seen since IBM’s Model M - Ars Technica - https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/shoehorned-windows-copilot-key-is-just-a-reprogrammable-macro-journalist-shows/
Microsoft Copilot Key : r/olkb - https://www.reddit.com/r/olkb/comments/193b5id/comment/kxqj1ve/
Linux 6.14 Adds Support For The Microsoft Copilot Key Found On New Laptops - Phoronix - https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.14-Input