In another round of late-night social media posts, Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court for not overturning his loss in the 2020 presidential election — and tried to pressure the court to rule his way in future election cases.

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump, but this one was particularly alarming for its scope and the criticism it directed against the nation’s highest court, where six out of nine justices are conservatives and three are Trump appointees.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    The Supreme Court actually DID steal an election.

    They stole it from Gore and gave it to another war criminal shitbag W.

    In hindsight, it’s insane how little the Democrats / Left complained about it… They just went like “Oh, you stole this election? Ok I’ll try again in 4 years. Have a good day.”

    Now compare that with this orange lunatic who’s screaming about an election he LOST and tried to steal.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      There was a good bit of complaining (for whatever that was worth) and W’s approval rating was in the shitter just like trump’s. Along came 9/11 which was definitely just an intelligence failure even though it was the best possible thing that could have happened for Bush.

      One of the many forgotten things about November 2000 was that the Supreme Court – before its final ruling awarding the Presidency to Bush – issued an injunction stopping the recount in Florida on the grounds that it would call into question the legitimacy of Bush’s win.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Toys thrown from pram again. Whaaaa Whaaaa Whaaaa. (Please bail me out, it’s all I know, so not my fault…)

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If there were any justice, Donny, you’d get impeached in November and put up against a wall with your entire family on Christmas Day.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Someone said it would be nice to be able to filter news for things Trump actually did than what he’s said.

  • PetoniousRex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    12 hours ago

    He is a putrid, lice-ridden tuft of anal pubic hair that’s been transplanted atop a grimy, tattered Egyptian mummy, that’s oft mistaken for a dried-up 6 foot tall, spray-tan colored toilet brush.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump

    Anybody who’s ever had to deal with someone with fronto-temporal dementia knows the symptoms.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I hate how much he reminds me of my late dad. Except my dad was well read and smart. Ah shit that’s not fair. My dad was generally well intentioned. But the narcissistic bullying and emotional volatility and the blaming and the gaslighting tho…

        • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Considering the gobsmacking heel-turn Fake Plapper has done, it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest to learn he’s related to Trump.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There is literally no mechanism by which that happens.

      Practically speaking, the next President has to go through and undo all of this asshole’s changes on paper, by signing new EOs and (in some cases) asking Congress for a law to sign. Most of it is administrative, so easy to undo without Congress.

      We can’t do anything about anyone he pardoned. They stay pardoned. Can’t get around that, Constitutionally.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Eventually we’ll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons. Those people will be expected to return to prison to serve out their sentences, or they’ll be declared fugitives, and an additional 10 years added to their sentence, no matter what the original sentence was.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And we’ll finally figure out cold fusion and faster than light travel and a unified field theory and everyone will get a pony

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Eventually we’ll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons.

      Let me fix that for you:

      Eventually he’ll get his second term declared invalid, and use that as his reason for running for his third term.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yep, when the House and Senate flips in the Midterms, the new Congress will no longer be business as usual. They will get with the program, or they will suffer the consequences right along with the rest of the MAGAs. There are already a few who will have to answer for their incompetence, like the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s always projection with this tiny dick chucklefuck pedo. He’s trying to sow some chaos so he can call on them to come in clutch when he pulls fuckery during the midterms and take a “you owe me one” approach.

  • F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Major aside, but every time I Wikipedia information about the justices, I’m struck by how young some of them look, despite being in their 70s. Wikipedia just uses 20+ year old photos, which I also rediscover every time.