Votes aren’t wishes. The electoral college is a thing. Many states are locked down for one side or the other and it really doesn’t matter who any individual votes for. In fact, being from Connecticut, I’ve voted for a third party for decades because I feel like it’s the only way for my vote for president to potentially have an impact. Unless you know this person lives in a swing state you’re being really ignorant by throwing out those kinds of accusations.

Oh I agree. Pedophile, hebebebenebebphile, who cares. Pervert. Criminal. Abuser. Rapist. Those fit either category.

Infidelity does demonstrate a lack of morals that imo should matter to the electorate. If someone is single or in an open relationship, sure. Otherwise, if someone is willing to betray their spouse, how can we expect them to respect us, a bunch of strangers?

Yeah. I’ve only ever seen the hebebebenebphile argument made by creepy pedophile motherfuckers. Nobody else wants to split hairs to defend this sort of behavior.

Or, worse, they’ll declare that child rape is actually good

Has politics always been this awful or am I tuning in because it’s so especially bad?

Yes

Jesus already rose from the dead, it’s why we paint eggs

She doesn’t even have the screwy eye

A way better team than the “Ruin People’s Lives For Daring to Get High” team

You apparently forgot that mental.illness is a disease and believe people should be killed for things beyond their control. Kind of like a Nazi.

I’m certain it is.

Yeah but graffiti swastikas go either way. Probably half the ones I’ve seen drawn somewhere are backwards

It’s sounds like he’s severely mentally ill and needs treatment. Maybe that doesn’t inflate your justice boner as much as him bleeding to death would but I think it’s the right move.

Hoping to see.his meltdown on truth social screenshotted today

Ending the two party system would require changing the way national elections work. That would require a constitutional amendment.

There is no mention of political parties in the Constitution, and elections are mostly left up to the states. It would take an unbelievable amount of will to change them but it wouldn’t take an amendment.

Have you tried turning off thumbnails? In my experience when it slows down on large directories like that it’s either trying to generate thumbnails or index a bunch of new files (which is also a possibility in your use case)

Windows
mountvol (drive letter) /p

Just because you don’t know the command doesn’t mean it’s not possible.

Nice reddit threads. Now check out the US Army’s official definition of “assault rifle”

The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as “short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges.” In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:

It must be capable of selective fire. It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO. Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5] It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army’s definition. For example:

Select-fire rifles such as the FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges. Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities. Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

It’s not a military weapon. It’s a civilian weapon that is shaped like a military weapon. Nobody in the military is carrying an ar-15.

Burst fire/full auto is what makes it an assault rifle. Whether we should ban the ar-15 is a separate conversation. My point is if you have strong opinions about something you should know what you’re talking about about and use proper terminology. You’re wrong when you call the ar-15 an assault rifle. That’s not good for your argument. It makes you easy to ignore.