• maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Fake money for criminals is speaking of USD here?

    Just because it grows at 8% doesnt mean its fake, its also fake because the Fed is a corrupt institution that stopped caring about measuring real inflation a long time ago.

  • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It so happens that stuff useful for criminals is sometimes also useful for political dissidents or simply people who consider the country’s laws too oppressive. Encrypted communication is another example of this.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      sometimes

      and sometimes firearms are used in defense.

      do the valid reason justify the illicit reasons? you’ll certainly say they do but I’m a bit more undecided.

    • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      well now we can add on: “illegal gambling on literally everything”
      and “1984 level surveillance being sold to the government instead of being done by them directly so somehow legal”
      … maybe something about giant ai networks of murder robots waging war?
      fuck why did we have to get the worst cyberpunk sci-fi future….

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I like this comment every time I see it posted in response to this meme. Then I hit subscribe, then I SMASH THAT BELL ICON SO YOUR MOBILEK SHIVERS WITH ECSTACY IN YOUR POCKET WHENEVER I POST AN UPDATE

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I personally hate the “thanks to AI you now can speak to your dead relatives” ones. Especially those ones which try to spin it like a personal story for the developer of the app. Oh shut up, you would sell your own mother for money. And also you are too late to jump on that bandwagon so get lost, we have enough of you leeches.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      On a related note, I personally hate the AI partner/friend ones as well, where it’s clearly preying on the lonely, insecure, or desperate. It’s dastardly, dystopian, and frankly, quite sad. How many children’s media show rich children as being quite miserable sods whose parents think that not having friendship can be resolved by buying their kids a friend?

      You could easily see that being in a cyberpunk story, where you can rent a friend or partner from a megacorporation, but if you don’t pay the rent, they’ll be repossessed and deleted/destroyed. The data would be collected and used regardless.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Because you have 2/4 general terms:

      1. Rideshare
      2. Short term rentals
      3. Crypto
      4. LLM
      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “Rideshare” is also the least accurate term used to dodge regulations. It is just a taxi/cab. You are paying someone to get you from one place to another. They aren’t sharing their ride, they were never going where you are going before you told them to.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Taxis/cabs are legal. Also, perhaps because of age, I tend to view taxis and cabs as phone numbers you call for a car to show up (or go to a taxi stand), whereas I see rideshare as reserve via an app.

          I think ride share really just means a vehicle that is used not solely for commercial purposes

          • kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            They are legal if you follow the regulations. The problem with the “rideshare” companies is that they don’t. We should just call them “unregulated taxis” rather than pretending that they are a different service. I think just about every taxi company these days is on some app or another (often the same that call unregulated cabs in countries that actually got their shit together and banned the unregulated ones).

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I use a local cab company. They smartened up after getting crushed by uber in the first couple years of their existence. Now they have an app that’s similar to uber, but I just call and use the web link that shows me where the car is.

            It’s literally the same service, but I have to give my info to Uber’s app to get it.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Uber/Lyft

      Airbnb

      Apart from the recently added surge pricing, what else is illegal about these 2?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        dependent on where you are, they are textbook skirting the law. uber got crushed when they launched in sweden because taxi drivers need to do basically the same training as bus drivers. it’s an extra letter on your license, with all that entails of age limits, theory and practical tests, x amount of time driven a year etc.

        nowadays ubers in sweden are just taxis, which hilariously means that they by law have to have a price list on the cars. which basically kneecaps their entire business model.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They literally exist as a way for tech bro libertarian idiots to circumvent laws around Taxis and Hotels because “Its totally just people rending their own stuff/time bro.”

        Like, the idea of Uber where its “we go to work along the same route,lets share a ride” is vaguely admirable, ie “rideshare” where it startrd. But its become people’s job and its literally just tsxis without the rules.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To be fair, they were popular at first because they were highly convenient. I remember Uber as the first to have a GPS map that told you where your taxi was. Most taxi companies and hotels were seriously lagging behind in terms of use of technology.

          That being said, they were malicious companies from the start and the whole business angle was built on taking advantage of loopholes. I’d be fine with a lot of them if they were nationally owned companies though.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They were also presented as being cheaper and more ethical. You didn’t risk being roped into paying a higher price because the cabbie deliberately took a long route, or be surprised by the price being different in person. You could order an Uber, and you’d pay only what was in the app.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Taxis and hotels used to be strongly regulated industries. For both, permits were required as well as regular checks. But Uber/Lyft/Airbnb created a system outside of the standard legal framework, allowing them to run an almost lawless business. So I wouldn’t say illegal but ethically grey.

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Nah it’s worse. Bitcoin actually has legitimate uses. (Yes, they are a minority of actual usage, but they exist.) NFTs are only useful for speculation, gambling and money laundering.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What would we do without capitalist innovation? Before capitalism, nothing was invented. Look at us now!

      • EzTerry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That is more a fronteir llm thing…

        I think quite a bit of what they are trying could with some optimization be run local thus no need to send entire context windows to big tech (sure this hypothetical model would know less trivia but in an agent system would be able to look it up)

        But of course big tech and other large orgs like hording all your data for profit.