Treason motherfuckas … Once more!

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yeah, we already know, because you’ve been doing it. “Do what I want or I’ll kill everybody!” He’s a child, just like the rest of MAGA.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        It will be even funnier if the sign says “no fascist have ever been removed by a protest”

        Not sure if people might take it the wrong way though, it might be a bit too based.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For anyone wondering, the three “justices” who sided with trump were Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito.

    No surprises there. If anything, Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett ruling against him is the surprise. It’s a win for constitutional rule of law.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      I think Barrett is a fucking slug, but as far as I’ve observed she genuinely wants to side on the side of the country. She’s just a woman surrounded by men appointed by a fucking narcissistic fascist, so sometimes voting is needed for her survival? Maybe?

    • _skj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’re concerned about the precedent set if they allow taxation to be included as part of regulatory powers. If they allowed this, then precedent is set for the next Dem president to come in and just start taxing companies that don’t align with their policy goals. So something like taxing carbon emissions no longer needs Congressional approval.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        True. Also, giving tax powers to a “unitary executive” is literally taxation without representation.

        There’s a reason it’s in the purview of congress.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So his argument is basically “I can bomb a county but I can’t extort a country for protection money”. Amazing.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Most prolific traitor in the history of the United States of America.

    Being prevented from receiving a traitor’s punishment by the ultra wealthy and inbreds across America.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    State of Union speech is tomorrow night. Trump’s batshit insanity is going to be legendary.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Would he have a stroke (with hard seizures) on live TV , i would pray eternally to the divine cholesterol.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ll wait for the executive summary.

      If I am forced to watch him for an entire speech I’ll punch a hole through my TV screen.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’m normally adverse to sound bites because 95% of the time more context helps their point, but I just can’t stand hearing this MF talk for more than a minute.

        Even during the State of the Union under Obama I stopped watching them. Way too much hold for applause.

        • billwashere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          50 minutes ago

          I’m glad I’m not the only one. I don’t have enough blood pressure meds in the house to combat his stupidity

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “So I said, ‘Let me ask you a question, and [the guy who makes boats in South Carolina] said, ‘Nobody ever asked this question,’ and it must be because of MIT, my relationship to MIT —very smart. He goes, I say, ‘What would happen if the boat sank from its weight? And you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery is now underwater and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there?’ By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately, do you notice that, a lot of sharks? I watched some guys justifying it today. ‘Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood what who she was.’ These people are crazy. He said there’s no problem with sharks. ‘They just didn’t really understand a young woman swimming now.’ It really got decimated and other people do a lot of shark attacks. So I said, so there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards or here, do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking? Water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted, or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted? Because I will tell you, he didn’t know the answer. He said, ‘You know, nobody’s ever asked me that question.” I said, ‘I think it’s a good question.’ I think there’s a lot of electric current coming through that water. But you know what I’d do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark. So we’re going to end that.”

  • Scrambled Eggs @lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This should be a quote used by textbooks for centuries to come.

    Either he will destroy democracy or this will be a turning point for more progressive leaders to become elected.

    Most likely the former.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, but the real issue is not what was said so much as who said it.
      I can actually understand a clever, charming, and charismatic person going evil and saying it after trying to become a dictator.

      Well, not understand it, but not be shocked by it.

      What I can not understand and what is shocking is how a thing like that orange child rapist could ever get a chance to have the power to say it…

      A notoriously corrupt, quite obviously a russian stooge, blatantly racist, confirmed rapist, totally inept, stupid reality TV star, 6 times bankrupt, Epstein’s best mate, and unregistered kiddie fiddler.
      Anyone of those should stop a person from having any real political power, yet the tantrumping toddler did all of the above -plus much more- and still gets elected, TWICE. . Then says that sort of shit and no fucker owns enough spine to say “Yeah, we need to get rid of him. He’s a fucking loony”.
      I just can’t understand it.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The answer is that the average conservative really is that fucking stupid.

        They don’t think, they follow party lines. Thinking takes away from drinking, and it’s easier to just stumble down whatever path their overlords dictate.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    15 years ago such a statement would have been unthinkable. Look where we are now and how fast we’ve gotten there. The repubicans went apeshit over a tan suit, but this? They sit on their hands.