

Also a regular rapist.


Also a regular rapist.


It’s not sympathy. It’s recognition that Nazism is a disease any society can succumb to. It’s refusal to take the cheap option and say they’re not human. Their being human is what makes Nazism so dangerous. And we probably agree that you can’t pull punches in dealing with Nazis.
I suspect we’re using the term “human” differently. In my book it’s neutral: humanity means great potential for good and evil. Nazism is the great evil in humanity’s potential. But by “human” people sometimes mean to focus on what makes us capable of compassion and selflessness and not just brutes. There’s none of that in Nazism: it’s sheer brutality and selfishness. So in that sense Nazis do lack humanity.
I reject your claim that I’m sympathetic to Nazis. There’s no sympathy for Nazis here, just a recognition of how deeply dangerous Nazism is.


“Nazis aren’t human but we are” is how we got to the point of having Nazis everywhere again. It’s this kind of thinking that makes people complacent. Nazis are ordinary humans, ordinary people. Becoming a Nazi is a thing regular people do. That’s why Nazism is so dangerous. They’re not weird monsters, they’re regular humans acting as a poison in society. Every society should be on guard for signs that its people are turning Nazi.
Which isn’t to say we should be gentle and tolerant towards these poisonous people. Left undealt with, Nazi poison will destroy everything. It has to be dealt with decisively, and when the government is full of Nazis it’s up to the people to fight back.


Why on earth would you think that’s his mindset?



The fact that he spent decades fucking kids with Epstein is sort of interesting. He might be eligible for some kind of “bigliest pedo rapist” award. It’s interesting enough that they should release the rest of the files like they’re legally obligated to do.


The article is worth reading. It describes what kind of credit scoring system does exist in China, and what is sensationalized Western propaganda.


You’re misreading the headline because it contains a scope ambiguity:
vs
1 would mean that they killed a bill whose aim was to stop military integration. 2 would mean they killed a bill, and their aim in killing the bill was to stop military integration.
You’re reading 2, but 1 is what the publisher meant. There was a move to integrate US and Israeli militaries. Then there was a bill to stop this integration. But that bill got killed by pro-Israel votes, so the integration is still going ahead.


“Wake up, Jeff.”
My first thought was “Oh, Paul McCartney likes The Wiggles?”


There’s no proof in the video that he has pants on.


You have to be a straight, white, cisgender, conservative man.


Alongside other neo-Nazis. I’m sensing a theme with these Trump people.



revealed to the world how affable the US military is
Is “affable” really the word you meant here?


I doubt it can be done in time for the election.


For some reason all I see is a picture, not the article. Here’s the link in case anyone else has the same problem:


OP, why have you posted this 13 times?


Women’s rights and Transgender rights are in conflict
Some of us would strongly disagree with this fundamental premise of yours. You state it like it’s a solid basis on which these matters should be debated, but it’s actually a controversial point that could only emerge as the conclusion of an argument. It needs justification at least.


Aka RFK Jr’s hot tub.


And presumably the taxpayers will pay for it…
How Trump has predicted Iran deal 37 times since March without one materialising
That was published a few days before his latest announcement.