I could have happily watched that for a lot longer.


Well it’s not like there are any glaring examples on the world stage of exactly how this combo can cause your country to plummet very rapidly into misery and violence from which it won’t recover.


They’ll get a surprise when they realize they just made every server in the UK illegal and stopped the economy. But perhaps “relevant devices” are only those owned by the plebs.


Some of them are frog-faced loudmouth wankers.


Funding bill let Democrats make a statement without creating a standoff.
That’s a very optimistic way of saying “lets Democrats make a feeble token gesture of mild disagreement while still going along wholly with the fascist program.”


Who knew that real-life Big Brother would turn out to be as dreary and limp as Keir Starmer?


Tor gets better the more people run nodes. The main danger with Tor is that someone can control enough nodes to analyze traffic back to its source. The best insurance against that is loads of independently run nodes. I2p is less convenient than Tor but actually a little more secure against that kind of traffic analysis I believe.


Stop asking the Baileys, Chuck. They’re full of shit.


Yes, grab your meshtastic (or similar) gear now before you can’t any more.


OK. Here’s another:
Israeli fire kills 11, including journalists and children, Gaza medics say


deleted by creator


The NYT is still intent on portraying these as a sequence of reasoned policy positions, and not the aimless meanderings of dementia writ large on the world stage.


It’s because they’re privileged people who only notice government when it inconveniences them. Liberty for them means “I can do whatever I want and I am under no obligations to my country or anyone else.” Underneath the rhetoric, the motives are the same as for “small government” conservatives. They care only about what directly inconveniences them, not about principles or other people. Small government or freedom from government just means “don’t ask anything of me.”


More fascism. That’s a plus for “former” Hitler fan Nigel.


this is all assuming that Dems don’t immediately cave
That bit sounds implausible.


Michael Scott would make a better President than the orange fascist buffoon.


Is the US military by now really, as some want to imagine, populated by courageous conscience-torn patriots with a rock-solid allegiance to the constitution, prepared to take the huge personal risk of disobeying orders out of love for the laws and people of the USA? Or is it a bunch of young people who are bored until they see some action, who’d rather do as they’re told and get through in the hopes of better opportunities later, commanded by the remaining generals Trump has picked for their loyalty to him above the country? Probably somewhere in between, but some journalists’ hope that the military’s moral sense and commitment to their oaths will lead to mass disobedience of illegal orders seems highly optimistic. The US military has a long history of invasions and atrocities, and although it messes people up and they may struggle to live with what they have done afterwards, they still tend to do it.


It’s not clear how long Canada can fend off the far right, both internally and from the USA. I hope we can survive but there are too many damn Conservatives around.
On the positive side, perhaps he’ll get in a muddle and deliver peace with Iceland instead of war with Greenland.