

In this context a “rigged election” just means trying to prevent anti-GOP voters from voting.
If you don’t try to vote you are willfully giving the GOP what they want without them having to rig the elections.


In this context a “rigged election” just means trying to prevent anti-GOP voters from voting.
If you don’t try to vote you are willfully giving the GOP what they want without them having to rig the elections.


Don’t try moving the goalpost. Especially to promote your blog…
The fact of the matter is if the polls are wrong for Hillary then they are wrong for Bernie.
Wrong doesn’t mean that averaging them out gives you an indicator of what the real election results would be.
It means that the polls are wrong and will skew one way or another depending on the group polled.


Your sources are your own blog. Hopefully I don’t need to explain why that isn’t a credible source. Especially when they start off with this red flag: “First off, Jill Stein and the Green Party were not a spoiler in this election”
If the polls are inaccurate then it doesn’t matter what the polls say…


The polls weren’t really saying that on any regular basis. A few said she’d squeak by, some said she’d lose,
The exact same is true for Bernie. That’s the fact that I am pointing out while reminding you of your bias.
Your argument is ‘the polls are wrong when they say what I don’t want to hear but they are accurate when they say what I want to hear’


190 republicans vs 100 democrats That’s 90% more genocide from republicans.


You’re right and if no one steps in and tries to bring them back to reality they will try to run a campaign without the support of the voters and America with slide further right as a result of their delusional thinking.


What about the polls that said Hilary was going to win? They were wrong so couldn’t your polls be wrong also?
Seems like you’re giving those polls merit based on who you want to win.
I personally know 2 conservatives that switched to democrat to vote for Bernie in the 2016 primary because they were so confident he would lose but they weren’t sure they could beat Hilary. They laughed at the idea of Bernie winning.


No one wanted Clinton or Biden, but the DNC forced them through, which certainly showed with voter turnout.
They both did better than leftist. Which is expected because centrist are the largest voting demographic.
They could use this moment we are in right now to win some of the base back. Hold town halls, where all they do is listen to communities. Use all of that to develop a platform people actually get excited for. Put forth candidates who reflect those values. ??? Potentially get the ship pointed in the general direction that might lead us to something better than what we have now.
Leftists could do this also but I’ve seen more liberals doing it this election season than leftists. Which is expected because leftist have so few voters.


Voters have made it very clear they do not want leftists. Leftist win the fewest elections out of all ideologies across the whole spectrum.
Blaming the DNC for the actions of voters is ignorant.
Leftist have the fewest voters and candidates out of all the ideologies across the spectrum due to their own lack of popularity.


To avoid the accusation of “joining the war” soldiers have become legal citizens of Ukraine to help fight. Not only US soldiers but soldiers from other European nations as well.
The same thing has been done in Russia using Chinese, North Korean and Brazilian citizens just to name a few.
But the US military has definitely been sharing intel with Ukraine. Ukraine doesn’t have the ability to spot their targets deep inside of Russia alone.


The existence of the US military is a prerequisite for the development and manufacturing of those weapons. The US military trained Ukrainians on weapons use and tactics and shared intel. Some even became contractors to join the fight.
Other than that it sounds like you agree with me that this is a leadership problem.


That’s a leadership problem just like I said.
Every country has a military.


Supply weapons, labor and funding and got European nations to do the same. This was before Trump became president.


Not only that but if it wasnt for the US military then Russia would control Ukraine and would be advancing into Europe.
Or China would have already invaded Taiwan.
Or North Korea would control South Korea.
The problem here isn’t the US military. It’s the leadership.
But the foreign bots brigading lemmy want the US military weaker so those nations can advance their geopolitical goals.


Says the country supplying Russia with drones


Removed by mod


Gaza is saved! For Trumps new golf resort!
This is how “election rigging” works. Your feelings don’t change that