I know people out there who have invested a lot in gold under the belief that in the event of like complete societal collapse or hyperinflation, they could use it for purchasing.

I have the hunch it’s a scam, but I haven’t learned enough monetary theory, business, or economics to understand why.

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    NFCs, bitcoins, silver, gold, whatever. If the only way people can cash out is to get someone to buy what they’re selling, there’s always going to be an element of grift to it. It’s just some are more grifty than others.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    It is an ok hedge on inflation, but it is pushed a lot by scam adjacent businesses to push up consumption.

  • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    When was the last complete societal collapse?

    Gold is a good hedge against inflation. When was the last hyperinflation in your country?

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The thing about the value of gold in a society is that it is only valued within the society. If society collapses, there will be no group or entity that could value it. You’d need to wait until people start rebuilding. But then you’d need to be in a position to shape how currency is decided on and minted. Unless you’ve kept your load of gold secret, it’ll be hard to convince people to adopt gold as a currency without starting on more even ground.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ever since we found gold we have valued it. I don’t understand the position of, “Oh, no one will value it!” We love the shit and it’s a store of value. How much value is dependent.

      • Mesophar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You can’t eat gold, and you can only trade gold for food if that person can trade the gold for something else. I’m not going to say there’s no chance of gold being valuable in a societal collapse scenario, but I’d rather wager with resources than a pretty, shiny metal. I don’t see how that’s a position that can’t be understood. Gold works as an intermediary exchange, but direct barter can always be counted on.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Because it was found by people in society. It was given value within an established society. I’m not saying no one will value it. I’m saying that until there is an established society, it won’t hold value. Then if you do end up in a society, you need to sway them to adopt gold as a currency while keeping your gold stores secret.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Because it was found by people in society. It was given value within an established society. I’m not saying no one will value it. I’m saying that until there is an established society, it won’t hold value. Then if you do end up in a society, you need to sway them to adopt gold as a currency while keeping your gold stores secret.

  • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I assume you’re talking about physical gold.

    Yes, it’s generally a scam. Some middle man is going to take a cut of what it’s worth before you enter the market - and they’re almost always going to misrepresent it’s value, especially if it’s not in the form of a stamped bar. Then you basically have to store it and shlep it and secure it and keep it secret, which will further diminish profit. Then you have to sell it, presumably as part of your retirement plan…or leave it to somebody who’s going to lose even more of its value when they want to unload it inefficiently.

    If you’re not wealthy in the first place it’s only worth investing in as a hobby…because you have to factor in the value of your time and subtract that from its value, as well.

    As far as it being a hedge against the collapse of currency? Bad idea. Skills and land you can defend are going to be the only hedges against that. Even if it had value post collapse…it would just put a target on your head.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If you’re looking for something to buy now that will have value in say 1000 years, gold’s a pretty good choice.

  • infinitevalence@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If there is complete societal collapse, then gold is going to be worth nothing, because you cant eat it. Bullets on the other hand you can use to take peoples food, or hunt for your own. So invest in bullets!

    Now if you just expect financial collapse but not total societal then sure gold, silver, bonds are probably fine if you want “safe” stable ways to hold your investments.

    In most cases, its just fear-mongering and gold has no more actual value than paper currency since they both derive their value from sentiment or perceived value. So if you show up at my house and offer me a small gold bar, you value at $10,000, and I value it at a potato, then your $10,000 is actually only worth a potato.

    • noodles@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In fairness, if the US dollar collapses, say, but the euro is fine and you find a way to get to Europe, you’re much better off with a few chunks of gold that will be worth relatively what you bought them for than with wheelbarrows full of hundred dollar bills which are now worth less than paper.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        I doubt you get far checking in a suitcase full of gold after the dollar collapses in such a colossal way

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The only things that will have value when society collapses are food, water, shelter, off-grid power, ammunition, and weapons.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Don’t forget “skills you can use to make yourself valuable to a small community”, especially the skills to grow and prepare food, locate and purify water, construct and maintain shelter, maintain and upscale off-grid power, and use ammunition and weapons.

    • tea@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It will be whatever the remnants of society deem valuable and convenient to use for condensed wealth. Probably bottle caps.

      Unrelated, anyone else looking forward to fallout season 2?

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When the world collapses, nobody’s going to care about gold.

    Stock up on bottlecaps instead.

    • Starstarz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      As a person who has an abnormal number of bottlecaps for hobby reasons, thank you for making me feel rich! Also, why would anyone else want these?

      • Atlas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think they’re referencing the game Fallout where bottlecaps are used as currency

      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s almost certainly a joke but bottlecaps in a post civilization society would make a pretty decent currency, more so than gold.

        They’re light, easy to carry, hard to reproduce and therefore scarce. They’re also useless for anything else. So if you happened to have a lot of caps laying around they might find their way to becoming a currency.

        Gold is heavy, requires a lot of work to make it useful as a standard, and has other practical uses. Caps are actually better.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Lots of things can be used as currency. Gold was the OG because it is scarce, takes work to mine, is finite(ish), it doesn’t tarnish or corrode in air or salt water, isn’t attacked by acids except agua regia, meaning it doesn’t degade over time. It’s a really good medium for labor-value.

    Problem is, it’s also a useful metal now, in semiconductors and electronics, so now it is being ‘consumed’ by industry in a way that isn’t readily recoverable except at product end of life, and even then it’s not 100% recycled, probably more like 10%.

    So the global supply increases due to work mining, decreases due to consumption as a commodity, and is still treated as a currency equivalent.

    Solid gold is easy to store, and will survive calamities, bank collapses, fires, floods, ect where other intrinsic value items don’t.

    So it’s a good investment if you believe that you will survive the deletion of society, AND you believe that it will be tradeable post-collapse. Or if you just treat it like a commodity.

    But post-collapse, gold isn’t intrinsically useful. In these events, other useful, consumable goods might be better for goods and labour exchange. In the early Australian colonies, there was no money, people bought, sold and got paid in rum.

    Rum is a reasonable value holder, it can be preserved against degrading, it is ‘fungible’ and divisible in a way that gold coins arent.

    Dried grains are a good currency too. Maize, wheat berries, etc, as long as you accept that your value will be contually consumed and replenished.

    Whether a thing has value is largely determined by whether the society you end up in decides it has value.

    The indigenous Australians would happily trade a gold nugget for rum or rope or steel tools, because their society had no use for gold, but did have use for steel.

    Disclaimer: The only gold I own is in my phone and computer.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Complete societal collapse, hard to say what, beyond the basics, would be useful as a medium of barter.

    But, in a society facing major issues, e.g., hyper inflation, or say, a US government default, yeah, gold is a pretty decent hedge bet.

    The traditional safe haven has been government debt but that’s been seen as an increasingly risky bet where you could lose a lot of money to inflation or worse, government default/intervention.

    So, while not ideal, gold at least seems a better bet than most other “safe” places to put one’s money.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, it really depends on the nature of the societal collapse.

      I can imagine situations in which being able to press a gold necklace into the right palm might get you out of a tricky situation.

      On the other hand it’s hard to imagine a situation where a horde of gold bullion in your safe at home would be very helpful.

      • eightpix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart

        In August 1976, gold was $35/oz, close to its historical level. By October 1979, it was $380/oz, over 10× increase — peaking (for the 20th c.) in January 1980 at $668/oz.

        20× return in 3.5 years.

        Gold doubled again in value by December 2010, and again by January 2025 — to $2800/oz.

        The all-time high, 20 October 2025, $4377.58/oz.

        125× return in under 40 years.

        I’ve seen it said: it’s not that gold has gotten more expensive. Its that the USD is debased as a currency against the dollar. The gold standard for USD ended in August 1971.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Pretty much. Gold is a time-tested store of value. But it is not a solid investment. (stores of value and investments are not the same thing)

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        So gold is inflation-proof?

        Yes, but only to the extent that you can store it, defend it and find a buyer when needed.

        Gold loses value at exactly the rate of the cost of the armed guards you are paying to keep it from being stolen.

        Pay too little, and it takes its value to someone else who is better armed or sneakier.

        And if someone set aside gold for you that you have never seen, no they didn’t.

      • infinitevalence@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No its not, because going up in value means its inflating because the base currency you are pegging its value to is also inflating.