The Trump administration wants all current and future federal employees to sign non-disclosure agreements, part of a continuing crackdown on leaks to the media.

The notice in the Federal Register from the Office of Personnel Management posted Tuesday asked for comment on a draft NDA to be used by federal agencies for “both new and existing employees.”

“The form is intended to document Federal employees’ acknowledgment of, and agreement to comply with, current legal obligations to safeguard non-public, confidential, or proprietary information, created or obtained through their official duties, while expressly preserving the right to make disclosures authorized by law,” the notice said.

The notice sought comment on several questions, including whether the NDA should cover only unclassified information and what appropriate actions, if any, agencies should consider for new or current employees who choose not to sign the agreement.

The OPM noted “several recent instances” where internal agency communications related to rulemaking and policy development were disclosed without authorization. It also discussed specific instances in which federal employees at the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security disclosed information about planned immigration enforcement actions without authorization.

In one case, the New York Times and Washington Post received unauthorized information on the U.S. raid on Venezuela this past January and delayed “publishing what they knew to avoid endangering U.S. troops,” the OPM request for comment said.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    There’s already a classification system and standards for how things are handled. Here’s a hint: resort bathrooms are not the proper place to store TS/SCI. Maybe start to get that and other opsec right like not using signal chats first?

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    It sure would be a lot simpler if they’d just stop being gigantic pieces of shit.

    I think if such a thing happens we’ll know. We’ll know it’s officially over, Democracy that is.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is hilariously meaningless. Federal employees have all already agreed to this by signing their employment paperwork.

    There is also required annual training, that every federal employee must retake every year that refreshes their “legal obligations to safeguard non-public, confidential, or proprietary information, created or obtained through their official duties.”

    That description of the NDA could easily have been taken from stock language for any employment contract. This just feels like another excuse to weaken job protections for civil servants.

    • oppy1984@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yep. 20 years ago I applied for a screener job with the TSA, just to take the test to see if you qualify you have to spend time going over the NDA and understand what you’re signing.

      I know for a fact that everything I saw is now outdated and useless, yet I still have about 55 years left before I can talk about it. And before anyone asks, no I didn’t see anything special, just overly security conscious government B.S.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good! The LAST thing We’d want from the MOST TRANSPARENT Tax Payer funded Administration in HISTORY is Transparency! I’m an Alpha Wolf!

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Trump loves NDAs. They’re wothless for what he wants, to hide criminality, but are an effective intimidation tool.

  • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    They really out here thinking that NDA’s will stop ANONYMOUS leaks?! That wouldn’t even work as a deterrent.