Microsoft and other US tech companies successfully lobbied the EU to hide the environmental toll of their datacentres, an investigation has found, with demands to block a database of green metrics from public view written almost word for word into EU rules.

The secrecy provision, which the European Commission added to its proposal almost verbatim after industry lobbying in 2024, hinders scrutiny of the pollution that individual datacentres emit. It leaves researchers with just national-level summaries of their energy footprints.

The rise of AI chatbots has spurred a boom in the construction of chip-filled warehouses with a hunger for power that is being met, in part, by burning fossil gas. Legal scholars warn the blanket confidentiality clause may fall foul of EU transparency rules and the Aarhus convention on public access to environmental information.

“In two decades, I cannot recall a comparable case,” said Prof Jerzy Jendrośka, who spent 19 years on the body overseeing the convention and teaches environmental law at the University of Opole in Poland. “This clearly seems not to be in line with the convention.”

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Perhaps we shouldn’t send politicians burned by domestic corruption scandals to Brussels. 🤔

      No one should fail upwards.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay so we’ve all been saying this since when?

      When?

      When does it start?

      Now?

      How about now?

      Now??

      • 4grams@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, gotta start somewhere. I too would like to see more direct action in play but we’re trying to motivate nations here, tens or hundreds of millions of people.

        Take no kings, I get that it’s been toothless, but it built a large following and the next one is calling for action. It probably won’t work, probably won’t be enough, but it will build momentum, and the next gets more, the next more still. This is obviously US focused (I’m American but this shit has gone global).

        It took them a very long time to infiltrate the governments, this has been going on for decades. We won’t be able to solve it in a weekend. It’s going to take time and hard work to fix this shit.

        • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Eh, you just need to convince the politicians that bending to the lobbies will be unhealthy for them and their families, not hundreds of millions of people.

      • YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean some people have started see Luigi, warehouse guy, guy who threw moltov at Sam Altmans house, guy shooting at politicians home for voting in favor of an AI datacenter in their town, and I am sure there are more that I am unaware of too.

  • rogsson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why the F do we care about what US companies wants? Stay the F away from EU soil if decency, ethics and laws doesn’t fit your style.

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I believe the proper nomenclature is lobbied. Therefore it’s legal and okay. Definitely not just another word for bribery and corruption, no no no.

        Don’t look inside that brown envelope under the table!

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It said they lobbied for it, which means that the politicians don’t care, so they give them something they do care about so that they support it anyway, namely money.

      It’s the whole reason 99% of politicians choose that career in the first place. All they have to do is look like they don’t support something that the wealthy want them to support, and they’ll be given buckets of money to sway their vote.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    dont want people to know how badly it is polluting the area around data centers, and the cost of electricity, and fuel.

  • linule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I keep reading about lobbying. I don’t fully understand how it works. Are there requirements for disclosure, approval and public transparency, or is this just something individual politicians or groups can do just like that?

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        But why do individual politicians or groups have the power to get these things through? Is it not subjected to a majority vote or something?

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because a free society does require the ability for citizens to petition their government (imo).

          Corporate lobbying is just what happens when that’s not properly regulated

          • linule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So the lobbying is, in each particular instance, of potentially 100+ people (in the case of EU parliament 300 or so +), likely across parties? That seems difficult to organize, at first sight.

            • moody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Lobbyists are people working on behalf of companies whose job is to meet up with politicians to discuss their issues. Typically that involves some back and forth that may or may not be considered bribery.

              You want a law to protect your business? You go talk to lawmakers behind closed doors about how some laws are needed to better protect children and also data centers, and subtly let them know that maybe your company might have a job for them in the future.

              Those lawmakers then go out and propose these laws and they sell the idea to other lawmakers who approve them for the children and datacenters.

              • linule@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                So mostly not a consequence specifically of lobbying, if the majority votes due to actual conviction. Rather of disinformation/laziness, which will affect non-lobby initiated proposals too.

                • moody@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Lobbying on its own is not the issue. Nurses’ lobbies and teachers’ lobbies, for example, work for a good cause.

                  The issue is that lobbying is done in private, and citizens don’t hear about anything until laws are proposed, by which time they already have momentum and are very hard to fight. And once laws are enacted, it’s even harder to reverse them.

    • Photonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s supposed to be a way (groups of) people can make their case to the legislative branch to inform them about their issues and propose ways to resolve them.

      In reality it’s just legal corruption used by magacorporations to screw over the aforementioned people.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The reality of the situation is more or less clear, but it helps to understand how things are supposed to work. They make their case and then what? does the audience decide on its own? Otherwise it seems difficult to buy the entire… voting majority?

        • Photonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not everything is voted on of course, some things are just decided by smaller committees.

          And for things that are voted on they “buy” few vocal debaters who convince the rest with bad reasoning that sounds legit.

          • linule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The part with the smaller committees sounds anti-democratic. The later is a different problem (politicians being misinformed/lazy is not specific to lobbying)

            • Photonic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s the way the world works. Not every decision can go through a plenary session. Nothing would get done that way.

              The latter is obviously not specific to lobbying, but it is the way they get their plans across. Not everyone in the parliament can be as well informed about every issue they vote on. If everyone had to read in to every detail of every single issue that they vote on, again nothing would get done.

              So if we want to get things done we need to accept that the system isn’t flawless. That doesn’t mean we can’t curb lobbying though. We need to improve the regulations on that. But of course, it is strongly opposed by lobbyists who hold a lot of power.

  • antisoumerde@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Those are the people who call Putin corrupted while blowjobbing every industrialist out there for a bribe. Big pharma rollout? Sure. Weapon industry? Bring it on. German automakers? You bet. Pedophile-led tech monopoly? Absolutely. My name is ursula, I’m a big whore. Go die in Ukraine, peasant.

    • Leomas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Putin is absolutely incredibly corrupt. Russia has big Farma Russia’s biggest industry is currently weapons. Automakers kind of stick out, those are not really immoral, just stupid. If you think any government is not fine with working with Pedophiles, you’re an idiot. No one with power in the EU has suggested anyone except Ukranians will fight on their side (except the volunteer forces and those will not be mandated) Meanwhile Putin sends the poorest of the poor to die in Ukraine and ACTUALLY lets people of other countries die for him. So you go die in Russia you cocksucker. Und leck Eier.

      • antisoumerde@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Make me, reetard.

        See you’re so brainwashed you think critizing our corrupt leaders and their obvious collusion to the will of the weapon industry is to support the bad guys on the other side. You go die for your wars, idiot. The Putin Yeltsin regime are fascistic ethnostate that have been put there by the americans. Same with ukraine and the whole of ex soviets. It’s the same people.

        And if you insult me again I will find you and make you swallow your own eyes and then shove you back into your mum’s rotten uterus.