

Am I reading this wrong or are you complaining that the unstable channel is unstable?


Am I reading this wrong or are you complaining that the unstable channel is unstable?


A common misbelief about anarchism is that it opposes rules. It doesn’t oppose rules though, but rulers. Those who wish to make rules for others.
If this were an anarchist world, which it should be, it would be perfectly fine to create rules for yourself and consensually with others.
Therefore, if he, and the others supporting the death penalty for this crime, choose to apply that standard to themselves then they should face the death penalty. That doesn’t mean that punishment therefore applies to everybody else though.
Your logic is fine, no slippery slope.
On a less related note, here’s my favourite video debunking the efficacy of the death penalty: https://youtu.be/_DrsVhzbLzU
The set of communication protocols to enable internetworking on the Internet arose from research and development commissioned in the 1970s by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the United States Department of Defense in collaboration with universities and researchers across the United States, United Kingdom and France.[4][5][6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet
The Web was invented by English computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee while at CERN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web
Bloody ignorant loud mouth Americans claiming credit for group projects, as usual.
Ew, a Pantera patch.


Who are you alluding to?
I couldn’t find anything of the sort about the developers of ActivityPub
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Lemmer-Webber
Edit: so instead of a response you’ve just given a downvote. Clearly full of shit misinformation then.


and even here we argue all day long.
No we don’t!


For anyone who wishes to know more about what Aceticon is talking about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause_IV
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Labour
Aye, which is why I said trees are better than no trees. I’m not advocating for ripping them out or anything ridiculous like that.
Just that when people see pictures like this, because there’s trees, they think it’s nature. It’s good. And yes it’s better than nothing, and it supports some life, but it could be so much better.
I don’t buy the argument that just because a city is old it should be absolved of its duty to nature. Poplar trees don’t get particularly old as trees go, all of these will have been planted sometime in the last 100 years. Future plantings should be sporadic, to mimic nature, but due to tradition and the normalisation of perfect rows most around the world still aren’t. People like their perfect neat rows, nature be damned.
So planted for human aesthetics.
Don’t get me wrong, trees are better than no trees. But the normalisation of perfect rows causes great harm by making people think it’s good and natural and how it should be. It normalises a fascistic view of nature that it should be controlled and perfectly ordered.
Nature is chaos. Nature needs chaos to properly thrive.
It’s good as a picture but depressing AF at the same time, that much of the world’s woods are perfect rows of plantation. Planted only for human economic gain or aesthetics.


We are currently clean on OPSEC.
Best I can do is a rap https://youtu.be/0Rw0QvEjwuQ


Unlike Reddit, Lemmy makes no attempt to spoon feed and algorithmically tailor to what it believes will garner the largest audience.
You have to do a little curating here. Block users, communities, and even whole servers that you’re not interested in and suddenly the whole experience changes.
I very very rarely block users or servers because I don’t want to put myself into an echo chamber, but I have a long list of communities blocked because I have no interest in them whatsoever. There could be anime girls posted every 10 seconds with thousands of upvotes for all I know, but I’ve blocked them because I don’t care. They can continue having fun in their community, I can be blissfully unaware of it. Win win.
Make the threadiverse your own and it’s far more enjoyable than everything all at once.
Don’t forget the scarcity through over extracting! Nothing says luxury like near extinction.
The urge to leave began with the idea of cricket song. Dex couldn’t pinpoint where the affinity had come from. Maybe it’d been a movie they watched, or a museum exhibit. Some multimedia art show that sprinkled in nature sounds, perhaps. They’d never lived anywhere with cricket song, yet once they registered its absence in the City’s soundscape, it couldn’t be ignored. They noted it while they tended the Meadow Den Monastery’s rooftop garden, as was their vocation. It’d be nicer here if there were some crickets, they thought as they raked and weeded. Oh, there were plenty of bugs—butterflies and spiders and beetles galore, all happy little synanthropes whose ancestors had decided the City was preferable to the chaotic fields beyond its border walls. But none of these creatures chirped. None of them sang. They were city bugs and therefore, by Dex’s estimation, inadequate.
This is from the first page of A Psalm For The Wild Built by Becky Chambers. Your post reminded me of it, you may enjoy reading it.


There’s enough evidence that Trump doesn’t pay his bills to question whether that paycheck would actually materialise


I just thought of something, is it on a specific rootstock? Was there a label with the cherries that mentioned it?
Colt rootstock should fruit once around 12-15ft and Gisela around 9.5 - 12ft, so if not this year then hopefully next you’ll start getting some fruits. However, if you’ve got a Malling, Mazard or Maheleb you’ll have a long wait still.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_tree_propagation#Cherry_rootstocks
With difficulty.