If we’re being obtuse asses then it’s:
War crimes.
Don’t hide sex crimes.
As if they’re pro war crimes and wish for sex crimes to be in the open. But we all know that is not what this sign is saying.
- 0 Posts
- 172 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 1st, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
4·2 days agoHills near me (northern Scotland) were once magma chambers underneath volcanoes! That’s how worn down they are. Wild to think about, and makes some lovely granite.
51·4 days agoYou are love
You are not alone
You are going through hell, but keep going
Be proud, be open
Be loud, be hopeful
Be healthy, be happy
Be kind to yourself
Be decisive
Here, now
Do not live every day as if it is your last
Live every day as if it is your first
Full of wonder and excitement
As you wonder along, excited
Marveling at the possibilities of all that stands before you
Here, now
That invasion began in 2014…
It marked the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Russian_annexation_of_Crimea
Definitely nothing to do with the editorial bias of Politico’s owners…
There’s speculation that that is something Trump and the Republicans are after, with some evidence to support that theory.
There’s zero evidence to support New Labour will attempt the same. This is just tin foil pulled out your arse conspiracy, which aids nobody but the fascists. Don’t let the bastards win, don’t spread unfounded conspiracies.
Only two elections have ever been cancelled in our history, both during world wars. Both times the ruling party didn’t keep control but instead a coalition government of varying parties was formed. The strategy of cancelling elections to keep power in the UK therefore doesn’t work, has no evidence to support it, and the ruling party don’t have the public support to even attempt let alone pull off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_George_ministry
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill_war_ministry
Yeah but that’s because you’re using logic, reasoning, and commonly understood meanings of words. In Kid Starver’s authoritarian mind none of those things matter.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly, and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall towards the earth’s centre.
- 1984, George Orwell
It was bad enough when people would refer to Reddit like it was some homogenous entity with a singular mind, but to do so about a decentralised platform is even more idiotic.
There’s parts of Lemmy you can’t even see because your instance has blocked them.
Available to view here: https://lemmy.world/instances
And then there’s also instances that have defederated from your instance, which don’t show on a neat list like this, for example Beehaw.
So the brazen claim that half of Lemmy is doing anything is idiotic, please stop.
I can, and will, hate both the game and the players.
The players at the top know exactly what they’re doing.
If me, a fucking nobody who reads while taking a shit, in between working all the time to pay the bills can understand what’s going on. There’s no way the richest in society, with the most leisure time and access to the world’s greatest educators etc, don’t.
Aye but there’s only so much you can water down your sampling before it’s ridiculous.
1,282 people is less than the amount normally polled in a country 5 times smaller.
If they only polled 10 people would you be arguing the same or would that be deemed a ridiculously small sample size?
Also bear in mind that they’ve claimed to have weighted the data for 8 categories, some of which have multiple variations within them. And they’ve managed to do all of this with such a small sample size? Utter shite.
I’m not saying I’m opposed to the idea of Americans being against the war, what I’m saying is it’s disingenuous to make authoritative claims, like the headline makes, on such a small sample of data.
Aye, that IPSOS are shite.
They polled 0.00037509% of the population and then make authoritative claims about the entire nation’s sentiments.
They normally poll more people than this in the UK, a country with 5 times less people than the USA. So why so few people for a USA poll?
1,282 polled out of 350 million… This tells us nothing.
I do believe, you may in fact, perhaps, be a nerd.
You don’t happen to have a simple how-to or wiki for these services do you?
Official documentation is all well and good but sometimes it can be a nightmare to follow and understand (Nextcloud for example had me pulling my hair) for us mere nerdlings that haven’t achieved full nerdhood yet.
The development plan for Trump International Golf Links, Scotland (TIGLS) included two 18-hole courses, a 5-star hotel, golf villas, holiday homes, and a golf academy. It was strongly supported by local business leaders,[2] but met opposition from local residents, campaigners and environmental groups anxious to preserve the 4,000-year-old sand dunes that were designated an SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest). In June 2019, Scottish Natural Heritage ruled that the golf course had “partially destroyed” the sand dune system, causing permanent habitat loss, and recommended that the SSSI status be revoked.[3][4] The SSSI special status was removed in December 2020.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_International_Golf_Links,_Scotland
Some should have been nature reserves before they ever even became golf courses.
And even then, they generally don’t wanna watch amateurs, semi-pro, or low league pros. Can only be the national/world leagues or nothing at all.
Almost as if they don’t really care about sport but instead are using it as a means to be part of a group, to have a cultural link with others. A shame sport culture is mostly brainrot pundits constantly waffling shite like “they really wanted to win this one” as if they’re not trying to win every time. No moment of silence and just watching the spectacle allowed. Constant punditry, hours of pointless analysis before and after every game.
Not to mention the constant hype as if each match is the most important of all time
Watching amateur sport is far more interesting IMO. Less predictable, more exciting, no bullshit punditry, more passion for the sport.
US created? What a load of horse shit.
During the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization, Szeming Sze, a delegate from the Republic of China, conferred with Norwegian and Brazilian delegates on creating an international health organization under the auspices of the new United Nations.
The first meeting of the World Health Assembly finished on 24 July 1948, having secured a budget of US$5 million (then £1,250,000) for the 1949 year. G. Brock Chisholm [Canadian] was appointed director-general of the WHO, having served as executive secretary and a founding member during the planning stages,[22][19] while Andrija Štampar [Croatian] was the assembly’s first president.
Pirating still aids them.
It still legitimises and normalises FIFA. By watching it you’re still engaging in their spectacle, still likely to talk about it with others, still accepting that it’s a legitimate tournament not ripe with corruption.
Even VAR decisions are controversial and corrupt at times, the whole reason VAR was claimed to have been implemented to prevent.
FIFA is rotten to the core, and needs properly boycotted. If you really care about football watch local leagues, not this spectacle of wealth, corruption, and power.
Depends entirely on the type of tree and type of vines.
A local tree surgeon, hippy, or naturalist (not to be confused with a naturist!) will likely be of more help than randoms on the global net. They can look at it up close and see what we can’t.
Generally though, nature is best left to do its thing. If the trees aren’t showing any signs of suffering because of the vines then just leave nature to do its thing.