President Trump on Wednesday said he is considering the formation of a “joint venture” with Iran to set up tolls in the Strait of Hormuz after the Trump administration and Tehran agreed to a two-week ceasefire deal.

[…]

The president also suggested Monday that the U.S. could impose its own tolls on vessels trying to transit through the channel. Leaders in Tehran signaled last week it would install a “toll booth” system to exert a price on ships seeking safe passage through the strait.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I know the man is just throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks, but the whiplash from “civilizational erasure” and “back to the Stone Ages” to “buddy-buddy halfsies on illegal tolls” is a little much.

  • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    This is insane. I don’t know why this hasn’t got wider news coverage.

    I were not able to find a better news article, but this news article somehow failed to mention the central fact that anybody demanding tolls, whether Iran or USA or both, is unambiguously illegal under international law. It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships. Legal Eagle describes why the tolls are illegal: Trump’s Illegalist War Gets Illegaler.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships.

      Says who? May I introduce you to the wonderful world of gunboat diplomacy? /s

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Says who?

        The most extraordinary thing here is perhaps that the US is not saying so. With Trump talking about imposing tolls. It used to be that like the #1 priority of Pax Americana was to insure international freedom of navigation.

        But Trump just casually throws that out the window, I assume in an unvetted 2AM Truth Social rant (I haven’t actually checked where and when Trump said it).

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Trump is President. Trump is the US right now. It is dangerous to pretend he is not.

            And it is not just an aberration. Congress could remove Trump any time they wanted to. But they do not.

    • realitista@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah because the law is the one thing that can stop Trump, right? Let’s stop kidding ourselves. The only thing proven to stop Trump is leverage and force. It doesn’t even take that much because he’s so stupid he can’t usually figure out ways around it.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Everybody benefits from the free trade system working - and that depends on international freedom of navigation law being respected. Also Trump voting Republicans, and Republican Congressmen, benefit.

        In a sane world, us voters would stop Trump. In their own rational self interest.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s fully within the territorial waters of Iran or Oman. I’m not an international law expert but it seems that it’s a practiced convention not a legally enforceable rule.

      Besides, international law is about who has the bigger stick.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        not a legally enforceable rule.

        Anything is enforceable with enough bombs, if there is a will. Any previous US President, Democrat or Republican, would have enforced it no question.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            as authorities

            You can pick any authority you want. No reasonable person disagree on what international law says here.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    here’s a joint venture idea to Trump: your goal is to fuck off as much as you can with your buddy Israel, and Iran do the toll collecting. Iran get benefits from tolls, and you get benefits by stabilising gas prices over time.

  • Zahtu@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    these was a guy in the comments 2-4 Weeks ago, who was already calling for that being the whole reason of the war. Trump and his lackeys are really executing the biggest grift in history. And the World only watches.

    With Iran beging a close russian ally and the Trump administration the same (looking at Vance in Hungary), i dont think its too far fetched, that the whole pupeteer all along has been the Kremlin, achieving multiple goals at the same time. most importantly achieving financing for the continuation oft their Ukraine war.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Joint venture” wherein the USA saves a few trillion dollars by standing down in Iran, and Iran tolls every ship that passes.

    Art of the Deal.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      That is the question. The current world system depends on there not being these kinds of tolls. But if Trump legitimizes them, then world trade could be fucked.

      The current system has worked so well for so long, people don’t even seem to realize how much wealth it generates for everybody. And that it doesn’t need to be this way. Actually not unlike what happens in the US, if the rule of law collapses completely.

  • disorderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gosh, I wonder what Iran thinks about that idea? The article has this to say:

    Any “joint venture” was not part of Iran’s 10-point peace plan that the U.S. agreed to and the president previously called “workable.”

    And that’s it! Guess this one is still in the “concept of a plan” phase.