The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state’s congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

  • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If this is the basket the Democrats put their eggs into I sense 8 years of the couch fucker in our futures. Newsome fucking sucks. At best he panders to progressives with one hand while he signs yet another shady bullshit deal behind closed doors like every single other politician alive with his other.

    You think it’s just a coincidence that all the money they raised with that benefit concert happened to go into non-profits that his wife runs? You think its been an accident that those effected by the fires haven’t seen a penny from that concert?

    California has some of the most corrupt and inept leadership it has ever had. More money than ever is being spent on things like homelessness and public transit projects, but strangely both the public transit and homeless problem have only been getting worse.

    Fuck Gavin Newsome.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why not? He has a key advantage over Hillary and Kamala: he has a penis.

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        He’s also a multimillionaire married to a billionaire, which helps. Him, not the voters, but it helps.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah, let’s put up another California democrat that’s too centrist to attract progressives and too California to attract middle America, it worked so well last time…

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      A month ago, I would have said the same thing. Right now though, he’s the only candidate I see standing up to Trump

      I don’t particularly like his policies, but I want someone either very progressive, or willing to get dirty

      The current regime is far too fascist for me to worry about whether someone is progressive enough

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s almost as if the people who find Republican issues compelling would rather vote for a full Republican than a Republican-lite. Maybe if he curses while doubling down on Zionism he will somehow reach the 3rd rail 🙄

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sure, let’s elect a Reagan republican dressed up as a democrat who will spend his whole term trying to reach across the aisle.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom torched his own political party and said Democrats have to speak to Republicans — and reject cancel culture — if they want to win.

    Screw that. I enjoy watching Newsom bicker with Trump just like I enjoy when the Lincoln Project mocks Trump. But the next democratic candidate needs to be an actual progressive that supports workers and the disadvantaged in our nation.

    • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I am very willing to debate this leading up to and during the primaries, but once those are done I am going to vote against the GOP no matter who is on the ballot.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You can make your case against Newsom during the primary.

          If Democrats generally agree with you, then someone else will be nominated. If Democrats generally disagree with you, then why would you expect them to do what you want?

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              If people really wanted Dems to prioritize labor issues, then Dems who prioritized labor issues would win primaries.

              • oh dear… no they wouldn’t. You’re living in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, the system is rigged against labor issues. Look at the ratfucking bernie got and he was a compromiye candidate.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Nonsense. Bernie lost because he is unpopular among Black voters. And polls consistently show that Democratic voters prioritize other issues over labor.

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          In case you haven’t noticed, the people who show up year after year and engage with the party are the ones who get their policies. If you demonstrate you’re feckless and undependable, politicians will rightly surmise that there’s no point even trying to please you because you don’t show up when it matters.

        • piefood@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Them: “The Democrats keep lying to us and screwing us over, WTF?!?”

          Me: “Well, you keep announcing that you will vote for them, even though they keep doing that, right?”

          Them: “Yes, but I can’t figure out why keep lying to us and screwing us over”

          Me: “…”

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    My fear is that the politics-as-sport metaphor has become too literal. He’s getting attention by hitting at Trump and more Democrats should be doing that, but his actual policies and stances are uninspiring and offensive. He’s another pro-corporate, pro-wealth, pro-status-quo white guy whose best quality is he isn’t Trump.

    • Atropos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Completely agree. I long for the day I can finally for FOR something rather than AGAINST something.

      On the other hand, not-trump is a pretty damn good quality.

      • GorGor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        On the other hand, not-trump is a pretty damn good quality.

        Sad but true. I fucking hate that we are talking about this fucking asshole, but like that bullshit recall election in '21, I will hold my nose and vote for harm reduction. So fucking depressing. You think its gonna be Trump again? If he wants to stay in power, breaking the 22nd amendment, why have elections at all?

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I am not American, but I would begrudgingly vote for him if I could. That is, unless, if the US progressives have gained momentum and takes over the party and

  • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pretty sad to see all these bluemagas already prepared to lose and suck it up and vote for gruesome newsom. Why would the dems give you anything if you’re prepared to do whatever they ask of you anyway??? Hey boss I would like a salary increase but dont worry if you cant I’m gonna work here forever no matter what…

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Let’s see if we get a competitive primary. We really haven’t had one of those since 2008. If Newsom can win over genuine challengers in a primary, then maybe he can pull off a win in the general.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    He’s not actually doing anything, and less than six months ago he was sucking up to Alex Jones and Charlie Kirk and telling them he agrees with them and the Dems need to move to the right on “social issues” like the existence of LGBT and racism.

    Newsom is who the billionaires want, he’d be the worst possible pick for anyone else.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thank God this is the top comment here. I keep seeing these posts about him and I’m just worried all the liberals are falling for his bullshit pandering.

    • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      God I’ve hated watching the way that this shitshow has turned Newsom into the Dem’s new darling rising star. He’s just more of the same neoliberal shit that got us here in the first place.

      Still, though, I’ll acknowledge that he’s at least publicly fighting back, and the more voices that we have screaming “this isn’t normal, this isn’t okay,” the better imo. I think he’d be a shit president, but in comparison to the situation we have going on now? He’d be a fucking dream.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ll acknowledge that he’s at least publicly fighting back

        He’s not…

        He’s making a lot of noise and saying he’s fighting back. But he got the Texas Dems to return to Texas so their redistricting can happen.

        But Cali isn’t redistricting. Right now it might be something that people can vote if they want it to happen, and even if that vote passes it might not happen.

        We’re losing actual battles because of his lies and misrepresentations about what he is doing in Cali.

        • xyzzy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          My guy, you know that it’s in the state constitution via the Prop 11 ballot measure in 2008 that redistricting cannot happen outside an independent commission. Voters need to approve side stepping that. Newsom is doing something by quickly putting it to a special vote, but he can’t just overrule the constitution. He’s not the president

          I don’t like Newsom any more than anyone else here, but when the progressive leaders you imagine are now running the Democratic Party step up publicly and take concrete steps to stop this creeping coup, then we can talk.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            So…

            It’s not guaranteed to happen…

            But because Newsom kept saying it would happen, Texas Dems already returned, and it will happen in Texas…

            But you don’t understand why this is a bad thing?

            You don’t understand that Texas Dems should have never returned?

            • xyzzy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You can down vote me every time I point out something you don’t like, but it won’t make you right. The people of California are pissed. LA just had mass protests and Trump called in the US military to silence them. They’ve drawn up a new map and it’s going to a vote. The odds are very good it’ll pass.

              People aren’t going to decamp for over a year away from their families because you demand it. What are you doing?

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                14 hours ago

                People aren’t going to decamp for over a year away from their families because you demand it.

                Decamp?

                If they don’t have what it takes to fight fascism, why the fuck are they in office?

                People (including their constituents) are being kidnapped and sent to motherfucking concentration camps, but staying in a hotel is too much to ask of them?

                With standards this low, no wonder you like Newsom

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  If you think you would be a better legislator, then go ahead and run for office.

                  If you can’t be bothered to run, then you know why they are in office.

        • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Fair. My intention was more to say ‘giving the appearance of fighting back’. My thinking on it was that it is, on net, better to have even an ineffectual example to serve as a reminder that dissent is a choice which both has been and remains available to us all. Your concern about the potentially performative nature of the situation doing damage by muddying the decision making of how that dissent should be handled, however, is extremely valid. Hell, a misunderstanding of what was happening in California even skewed my analysis of the situation until I just looked into it more.

          Either way, though, I still fucking hate the guy. I suppose I shouldn’t be too surprised, either; talking a big game and then doing exactly nothing while shit falls apart around you is a textbook Democrat move.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            is a textbook Democrat neoliberal move.

            And people are actually doing things. They’re just not neoliberals so billionaire owned media won’t talk about it.

            That’s my whole point…

      • Mose13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        We’re so short sighted and bad at making long term beneficial decisions. Idk how humanity is gonna survive

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He’s not a Dem, he’s a neoliberal.

        It’s way past the time to stop pretending there isn’t a distinction. We can’t just let them keep lying about what they are, because they’re trashing the image of the entire Democratic party.

        They don’t have the same goals, strategy, or process.

        Neoliberals are fundementally different than Democrats. And now that neoliberals no longer control the democratic party, it’s time to differentiate the two camps.

        • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Um what?

          Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Kamala Harris, Andrew Cuomo, and Gavin Newsom are some of the major leaders of the democratic party. They’re still running the party as they have been for the past few decades. Maybe accept that and stop supporting the party.

          Who is in a leadership position in the DNC that isn’t a neolib?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Kamala Harris, Andrew Cuomo, and Gavin Newsom are some of the major leaders of the democratic party.

            Because the neo liberals controlled the DNC for decades, and if reps didn’t vote for who the DNC wanted in those positions, the DNC would fuck with them and withhold the money that was stolen from their state via Victory Fund out of spite.

            They’d fuck over any incumbent that went against them, even if that meant a republican kept the seat.

            But the voting members of the DNC finally kicked the neoliberals out of power at the DNC.

            The people you are talking about are still coasting off the last leadership elections in the House/Senate when the neoliberals were in charge. They won’t win the next ones without the threats from the DNC.

            Does it make sense now?

            This is important to understand and billionaire owned media sure as shit aren’t going to explain it, so if you have more questions I’ll try to answer them.

            Who is in a leadership position in the DNC that isn’t a neolib?

            The chair, who unilaterally controls everything for the next 3 years…

            If you think he’s going to fight against progressives, look at the decade he ran Minnesota, it went from a purple state to deep blue and home to some of our most progressive House reps.

            If Martin is a neo liberal who wants to keep progressives out of office, he’s so bad at it he might as well not be trying.

            Logically that means the reason he was picked is the voting members of the DNC want to listen to voters again instead of screeching at them.

            Quick edit:

            But it seems you’re conflating House/Senate leadership with DNC leadership…

            They should be separate things, but decades of neoliberalism has intertwined the two.

            It’s going to take another House/Senate leadership election cycle to fix that, because the last vote happened with the old DNC.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I guess time will tell

                Martin ran Minnesota up till the day he became DNC chair…

                He’s not some random unknown person, there is zero indication to show he’s going to run the DNC differently than he did Minnesota.

                If he does start fucking around, believe me I’ll be the first to call him out on it. But right now there is zero logical reason to expect any difference.

                Though I’d still rather go for real socialism than progressivism

                That’s the great part about Martin.

                It’s not that he has a view of what voters want, and is going to try and make that work.

                He runs fair, unbiased primaries, and whoever wins he’ll put the full weight of the party behind them in a general.

                It’s why billionaires are trying to convince people they shouldn’t vote in the next dem presidential primary, and why it’s essential we counter that

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          From what I’ve seen, he’s further to the right than even many of the utterly useless center-right Democrats.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Out of curiosity, why did you reply to a comment about the importance of differentiating neoliberals from Dems, by conflating the two?

            • floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Because they haven’t left the Democratic Party yet, and though the party may be starting to move away from neoliberalism, most of its most prominent voices today are still neoliberals. Running Newsom as a presidential candidate would seal the deal.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Uh… We’ve all been saying those exact words for nearly a decade*, over and over and over… And, this is all where that gets us. 🤌🏻

      *(depending on one’s age/awareness)

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Lefties: got anybody yet?

    See, this is what having a national party can do for you. Getting some ink 100years out.

    To be clear, I’m not supporting this particular candidate or messaging, but I am saying if you’re planning to spike the anti-fascist movement again, please have a plan, and a name at least.

    We’re years out. Start now. Next September is too late to yoink the midterms. September 2028 is too late to complain about how much Democrats love teh geniside. Start Now. Have a plan and a name.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      If the DNC wants to win they should put someone up who will do that. Mamdani is actively showing them what will hand them the win and Harris showed them what will keep them from it. They seem to be continuing with the Harris strategy.

      Why AOC isn’t putting herself up for it and starting now I don’t know. She’s popular and well liked and has the right ideas, it would go pretty well. You’re right that whoever it is needs to start now, though. Of course, I did love that Harris coming up so late left the GOP completely lost as to what to do since they never really had a platform of good ideas.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think the Harris campaign started by being greatly benefitted from not being chained down by Dem consulting groups.

        Unfortunately there was enough time for the consultants (and, reportedly, Biden’s “people”) to force enough errors that lost a lot of that Big Mo.

      • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nah he canceled that out by making fun of Trump /s

        Sadly dnc and blue maga only care about that not his history of being barely left of an average republican