• Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    Who cares what Macarthy thinks. He’s a republican that bent the knee. He belongs in prison with the rest of the traitors.

    Don’t buy into this garbage. Just another attempt at dividing people.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    McCarthy is a moron & part of the reason we have Trump. Let him die in obscurity, the sooner the better.

  • krelvar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’d be happy to see an AOC/Buttigieg ticket in 2028.

    Warren for sec of treasury. Walz for HUD or even better, cabinet level position in charge of figuring out the young man problem. He’s representative of the role model a lot of young men are missing imho.

    I don’t wanna see another dem pres candidate that’s older than me (mid 50s) EVER AGAIN. The problems my kids are facing aren’t going to be fixed by old people, and while I’m not quite there yet, I’m fucking close enough.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There is zero reason to throw a moderate on there.

      Run a fair primary and number 2 gets first right if refusal for vice.

      If they don’t want it, let the candidate pick their running mate.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They just need a candidate that can get 100m votes. Like it should not be hard in the age of stolen data to pick a person who can get 100m people off the couch. I don’t care what the Democrats like at this point. If we can’t figure out a candidate and policy that will invigorate 100,000,000 people we don’t even deserve to be running.

        can you get 1/3 of the country to vote against fascism? challenge: impossible

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I mean VP in recent history is there to balance the ticket. If the presidential candidate is weak in one area, they pick a VP strong in that area. Sometimes the VP is just to lock in a competitive state.

        The winner picks the VP. If number 2 works well, great, but the winner picks.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ya my mom can barely grasp what’s going on right now. No concept of the future beyond her life. I’m pushing 40 and got no idea what the kids want or need or how our education system got so fucked. we really can’t be having geriatrics making policy that will affect the future beyond their immediate life

      • krelvar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        I would support a cutoff for president at say 60 when starting office, that would keep us below 70 for a two-termer. That’s plenty old enough.

        Also the 18 year rolling term limit idea for SCOTUS.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      in charge of figuring out the young man problem

      Both a great idea and one that will absolutely piss of the conservatives that are happy to see their young men embrace far right ideologies even if it comes with violent hatred in the process.

      • krelvar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        This was a great podcast episode that addresses the young men issue directly. Scott Galloway has been talking about it for a while.

        https://overcast.fm/+ABEb8GDsq4Q

        At about 70 minutes, he states that the greatest innovation from the United States is the middle class, and he makes a good argument IMHO. He talks about how there were about seven million men that came back from World War II having proven themselves, with some confidence, and of course being in uniform doesn’t hurt. They had opportunity for education, help with starting a career and affording a home, and all that made them attractive mates and led to the baby boom and the rise of the middle class. (I know it’s an oversimplification, of course.)

        Here’s a fun conspiracy theory for you – what if somebody recognizes that sequence of events and thinks the best thing we could do would be to replicate it? If that was your goal, what would you do to make it happen, but with a twist to the far right?

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    AOC, and progressives in general, taking over the Democratic party is the only hope for its successful continuation. Assuming we have elections.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    She’s young, she could decide to run for Chuck’s Senate seat in 2028. She would be just as compelling a Presidential candidate in 2032 or 2036…

    … But if a fair election is held in 2028, it is essential that Democtats field the best possible candidate, not just the next one up. (Hi, Gavin!) If AOC thinks that’s her, then I will happily support that. If she supports someone else (Booker, Walz, etc), I will also be listening. But if we fuck this one up, and Vance or Eric Trump or Sean Hannity get elected, that might be game over for Democracy here. We may not get another chance.

    As a NY State resident, I am eagerly looking forward to voting for AOC in some capacity in 2028, whether it’s for Senator, VP, or President. I’ll let her decide where she thinks she can create the most change.

    • Supervivens@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Eh if it’s just Vance running, I wouldn’t be too worried. The man has the charisma of a flopping fish

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        HW bush ran and won off the senile ghost of Reagan’s charisma…

        Vance could too.

        But we should still run AOC now, because after 8 years of AOC, there’s be new blood

        There’s never a reason to “save” a candidate, and nothing is stopping her from being a senator after.

        Seniority being important is something that the old guard just agreed on.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They might put him forward precisely because he has no charisma. The understanding would be that Trump was calling the shots, even if he didn’t hold the office. Puppets stop flopping around once their controller puts their hand up their ass and grabs the controls

      • valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is true, and it only got dramatically worse after they took office. The way he handled the Zelinsky visit was abominable, so he gets to tack that onto his resume now.

    • BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Lol yeah, she’s touring the country throwing rallies while Schumer is trying to lead, “We stand with Israel. We will win.” chants with the least amount of charisma possible and Jefferies is doing interviews and insisting the Democrats’ biggest issue is messaging.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Remember when we were all laughing at McCarthy because he wanted to be Speaker so badly and kept failing, over and over, to get enough votes? And how it was funny when he got ousted because of the rules he had to agree to in order to secure the votes from the crazies? And laughing because that, predictably, bit him in the ass?

    I feel like that stopped being funny when we got Mike “Shares his porn watchlist with his son” Johnson as Speaker. At least McCarthy was a politician and not a crazy, religious zealot two heartbeats from the presidency.

    Republicans --We Always Have Someone Worse Than the Last Guy

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      At least McCarthy was a politician and not a crazy, religious P2025 zealot two heartbeats from the presidency.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Things have always gotten worse with Republicans. It does not ever get better. What we had last week is better than what we’ll be dealing with next week.

      This has always been their way.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Things have always gotten worse with Republicans America.

        Feels like the old Russian mantra applies to us more and more these days. “And then things got worse.”

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No. This is very much not normal.

          Normal is trying to be good and often doing it. Not . . . whatever this is.

    • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      To be honest, I’m not sure who is better or worse between the two. Democrats at least appreciate that Johnson usually keeps his word during negotiations.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sure looks like republicans are scared of AOC.

    But centrists saw a progressive woman seizing the moment and suddenly decided that women can’t win.

  • MrErr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this is one case where I hope McCarthy is right. Might be a few election cycles before some tangible change, but it needs to happen.