It is crazy to think these morons believe they can fill trumps shoes. Trump is a once in a generation phenomenon. When he dies the republican base is going to crumble and either the republicans will have to rebrand or the dems will once again try to run a person that no one wants and lose in 2028. Probably both.

Blaming a bill (that was railroaded and made worse by republican concessions) instead of corrupt people and billionaires is crazy.

Committing to do your best isn’t a commitment. When you get questioned about it you just say you’re doing your best.

Why would you think Obama was on drugs? He was only 56 when his term ended.

There is a fine line between not following instructions and being combative. The reason yours doesn’t work is because it opens the conversation up more for the employer to ask questions. It tows the line of being combative and telling the employer to pound sand.

There is no harm in telling the employer you’ll try to fix something. You just can’t commit because they’ll hold you to the standard you set. Committing to “do your best” can’t be challenged and most middle managers will think they won the conversation.

Since you’re union the only correct response is: “I’m sorry you feel that way, I’ll do my best to work on that”. That needs to be your response for literally any type of criticism. It’s not an admission of guilt, it cuts the conversation short, and it’s not a direct commitment to fix it. If they follow up with more crap about why you need to fix it just repeat the line. If they want you to sign something, make sure to “RTS”

Man I’m thinking the same thing. Like brother have you not read a history book before?

Not porn. More like borderline sfw softcore. For a kid it’s more than enough though.

Got any inside tips for shopping there? Like good ways to save some money?

Just because a company had deep pockets doesn’t mean they don’t care about losses. Being a publicly traded company does drive their behavior to some degree. It only 1 news report to make them lose investors.

It’s good but pretty expensive.

You should remember them because they all happened in the last month /s

deleted by creator

Be honest with yourself. Of the candidates that have run in the last 20 years, who was the “most” attractive? Keeping in mind the majority of voters are boomers. With the exception of Kamala, the “attractive” candidate won. Hell go back even further, Al Gore won the popular vote, Clinton before that. You could argue that to win the presidency you just have to be the most attractive.

Edit. I should have phrased it better. I meant of the 2 presidential candidates, not necessarily attractive in general.

I think people underestimate how powerful it is to have a candidate that is even moderately attractive. Democrats are obsessed with running the oldest dinosaur they have because it’s “their turn”

You do understand. The gums are meant to get educated liberals killed. Not conservatives. When it happens to them it’s a problem.

Literally everything about it was revolutionary. One of the first games to have primary/secondary weapons. One of the first games to have vehicles and special weapons in an “open world” map. Regenerative shields.

A lot of games had these elements but no one had all of them in an online multiplayer game for console. Console gaming was still growing and Halo set a standard for literally every fps shooter after it.

I can understand that people find it repetitive but spare us the virtue signaling. It’s just a game it’s not that deep.

You mean you didn’t spend a month playing gwent?

Halos multiplayer was revolutionary. I’m not defending it though. I never liked it either but you have to admit it was a game changer.