• menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We don’t have to be dogmatic to be radical you know. Their is other way to oppose to capitalism and imperialism than to blindly believe in 50 years old theory that have be disproved since

      • menas@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m referring to the idea that “Supporting the opposition of the main imperialist, in order to weaken the all system”, a position often simplified as “campist”. I’m not saying it was shaky, however as all the other political theories, the working class shall observe how it worked.

        Their is a lot of academic and communist (mostly maoist and titoist, but not only) research to disprove this (see below), but what the point ? You may answer that this imperialist and bourgeois propaganda (which is partly true), and I will your sources are just others bourgeoisie propaganda.

        So I would suggest to rely on self-organized working classes. Are they supported or not by the organization, states or union we talking about ? U.S, Nato, Russian federation, Europe, Ukraine, Israel, People’s Republic of China, all this state crush unions or collective that ask too much or are too independent. And what we see is that supporting those state or organization weaken the expression of a self-aware proletariat and enforce the tools of its repression. Even States at war have no issue to copy each other to do so. It seems that spreading armed and state conflicts just make the Military–industrial complex to grow, and strike population everywhere (but not with the same violence). The Military–industrial complex is not unique to the US; it’s something important in some European countries, others NATO State (i.e Turquey), or the USSR (at least in its last decade).

        If you disagree, please, provide your sources


    • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I dunno, mate. Maybe I’m an idiot, but when Putin goes on TV and says a bunch of overtly nazi shit like how LGBT rights is pure satanism, I just can’t help believe that maybe I shouldn’t be on their side.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I want to outline what just happened here.

          Someone posted a meme making fun of people saying two things can be bad, implying one side (Russia) isn’t really bad. Someone replies that the overt nazi stuff putin says is pretty bad.

          You reply with whatabout Ukraine nazis.

          Either you are agreeing with the point that two things can be bad at the same time, or saying that one side doing nazi stuff is fine, actually because the other side does as well. Which is it?

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I want to outline what just happened here.

            I want to engage in aggressive strawmanning*

        • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t doubt that the Ukrainian army is full nazis and fascists. I also don’t doubt that the Russian army is full of nazbols and fascists. Armies tend to attract those sorts.

          I wouldn’t really know, but I would not imagine that Ukraine is a progressive country. Outside of the liberal enclaves of the bigger cities, I imagine it’s pretty bad actually. But here’s my surface level view.

          Russia:

          • has invaded a neighbouring sovereign country,
          • puts people in prison for being openly gay,
          • has banned legal and healthcare provision for trans people, and
          • openly declares to the world stage that it is fighting a rearguard action against western degeneracy in favour of Christian family values. (Admittedly I do not speak Russian and I can’t speak to what is translated as degeneracy or satanism or what-have-you, but no one has credibly disputed that this is the essence of what Russian ministers are saying on camera.)

          Ukraine:

          • has not invaded any of its neighbours recently,
          • has, on paper at least, legal protections for LGBT people, and
          • is still signed up to the European Convention of Human Rights.

          Regardless of the specific iconography that the less pleasant members of its citizenry choose to display their chuddery, one of the countries is prima facie more nazi than the other in its behaviour at this moment in time. And it’s going to take a lot more than “hurr durr imperialist propaganda” to convince me that it’s Ukraine, given those bare facts.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So much for “I just can’t help believe that maybe I shouldn’t be on their side” when it comes to Nazis…

        • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They’re not invading Russia other than a small little portion a few years after the war started.

          Those Nazi battalions would be far less defensible if Russia didn’t pose a credible military threat to Ukraine.

    • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s not bad being anti-war, but easy to being instrumentalized when not understanding the full context or even normalizing the dismissal of parts of it as enemy propaganda. It makes you naive

      • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        You need a lot of justify the loss of life these wars cause. Putting aside whether they’re justified or not, neither of them meet that threshold.

        Genuine question, but has there ever been a war where the expansionist was justified?

        • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Genuine question, but has there ever been a war where the expansionist was justified?

          No, and NATO expansion is being the root cause here

    • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      History shows that wars are divided into two kinds, just and unjust. All wars that are progressive are just, and all wars that impede progress are unjust. We Communists oppose all unjust wars that impede progress, but we do not oppose progressive, just wars. Not only do we Communists not oppose just wars; we actively participate in them. As for unjust wars, World War I is an instance in which both sides fought for imperialist interests; therefore, the Communists of the whole world firmly opposed that war. The way to oppose a war of this kind is to do everything possible to prevent it before it breaks out and, once it breaks out, to oppose war with war, to oppose unjust war with just war, whenever possible.

      –Quotations from Chairman Mao ZeDong Chapter 5 War and Peace

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This is just an expansion on “violence is inherently bad” which as an anarchist I hope isn’t something you believe

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Violence is inherently harmful.

            Some people and institutions do deserve to be harmed. Those people and institutions are almost never who actually gets harmed in war. War sucks.

            • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              do you know what’s harmful? capitalism. i’d suffer every pain for the world to achieve socialism. yes, you might not believe it, having a comfortable life in the global north, but there are people willing to be harmed to achieve liberation.

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              15 hours ago

              So would you oppose a war of liberation, such as the Vietnamese fought against Japan, France and America?

              • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 hours ago

                No, not really.

                But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.

                • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.

                  “The Palestinian struggle against the Israeli settler colonialists is not a war of liberation actually”

                  You might possibly be the least intelligent person I’ve ever seen.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I ain’t got time for a whole damn audiobook. If you want to make a pro-war argument, make it yourself.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      imagine thinking capitalists will just decide they are rich enough and give you everything for free.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        And you’re going to fix this by having one capitalist country blow people up in another capitalist country?

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          vassals blowing up the emperor, yes. that’s how it usually works.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You must be seeing some very different wars than the ones I’ve seen.

            In the wars I’ve seen, ‘emperors’ are rarely blown up, but vassals getting blown up is extremely common.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      For little kids is fine.

      No actually is not fine either, it’s better for kids to understand reality.