Malus, which is a piece of satire but also fully functional, performs a "clean room" clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell software without crediting the original developers.

Malus, which is a piece of “satire” but also fully functional, performs a “clean room” clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell, redistribute, etc. the software without crediting the original developers. But I have a hard time with the “clean room” argument since the LLM doing the behind-the-scenes work has already ingested the entire corpus of open source software – and somehow the output of the LLMs isn’t considered a derivative work.

  • inari@piefed.zipEnglish
    35·
    4 hours ago

    Also means you can feed leaked proprietary code to it and get open sourced versions

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      1·
      51 minutes ago

      Get console OSes since PlayStation BSD stuff could be useful for something, and Nintendo stuff just because they always lose their shit and show their true colours. Modern Windows source code for moving React OS forward because they deserve to hit a real release after so long. And of course all of the Creative Cloud shit to remove reasons for still paying the Adobe Tax.

    • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
      18·
      4 hours ago

      All it will take is for the reverse uno card to be implemented at a large enough scale against proprietary software before companies throw a pissy fit and this will all go away. Alternatively GPL could stipulate that AI implementation would trigger copyleft protections.

      This whole thing is stupid and in such bad faith. Maliciously clean room engineering open source software just to get around pesky licensing issues will cause so many more problems for these morons that already leech off the hard work of open source devs anyways. They literally have a steady stream of free software and all they have to do is NOT steal it. That’s it. Just don’t be a fucking evil goon, that’s the only stipulation. They’re shooting themselves in the foot so hard.

      But no, having free access to the hard work of others isn’t enough, they have to hoard it for themselves, like everything else in this deeply rotten civilization.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 hour ago

        Alternatively GPL could stipulate that AI implementation would trigger copyleft protections.

        I argue that it already does.

      • [email protected]@lemmy.zipEnglish
        2·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, I was thinking along similar lines when I first learned about Malus a couple days ago. Fine, so they get a “free” copy of open-source software that they can use without restrictions. What happens as time goes by and their “free” copy no longer receives any updates, fixes, improvements? I guess they can keep repeating the process every time a new version is released, but the whole thing seems counterproductive for anyone trying this.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      13·
      4 hours ago

      waiting for the ai that can turn the assembly output of a decompiler into readable copyright-free code too.

      this shit is not the own they think it is for foss.

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      2 hours ago

      … Dude will this actually work??

      Like say I throw in Sony PlayStation’s proprietary code for pkg installations on ps5 or something similar, I could just feed that into this and it would spit out a functioning open sourced alternative??

      Man the applications for piracy are insane. Lets fight fire with fire.