Malus, which is a piece of “satire” but also fully functional, performs a “clean room” clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell, redistribute, etc. the software without crediting the original developers. But I have a hard time with the “clean room” argument since the LLM doing the behind-the-scenes work has already ingested the entire corpus of open source software – and somehow the output of the LLMs isn’t considered a derivative work.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Alternatively GPL could stipulate that AI implementation would trigger copyleft protections.

    I argue that it already does.