Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.

You can reach me on mastodon @[email protected] or telegram @sukhmel@tg

  • 1 Post
  • 407 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle

  • This is an interesting finding, but there are two important things to keep in mind: they only reviewed some illnesses, and even there one had better cure rate for longer treatment, this means we need a lot more studies. And another one I will quote from the article you linked:

    You should still follow your doctor’s instructions about the length of antibiotic therapy.

    If you are feeling better and think that you may not need the entire course, be sure to ask your doctor first.

    Considering that many will not be able to ask a doctor on time to stop early, both because it may cost extra and because there’s usually a waiting list of who knows how long, it seems unrealistic to expect real change soon.

    So, I partially agree with you and will try to spread the info and ask doctors about this, but I think it should rather be seen as a need for more studies. Maybe there already are more, the article is from 2017, but right now I don’t have time to search for that.

    Thank you for the information















  • lad@programming.devtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devThe harder job
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was toldo the other day that in ten years there will be no testers because developers will do all the testing.

    I’ve seen how it works out in practice: there’s not enough time for testing and for developing, too, developers are going to burn and the product is going to be shit done and shit tested. Maybe it works if your company is willing to spend extra for less results by someone doing all the stuff less efficient than what they could, but that’s a rare occurrence.