and which of these two you are going to get paid more for
the secret answer to this is
neither :(
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @[email protected] or telegram @sukhmel@tg
and which of these two you are going to get paid more for
neither :(
It looks like exactly 4 characters are missing, so public
and static
would fit, but I never saw static
instead of public static
, so I think you’re right. On the other hand, I don’t use Java anymore and couldn’t be bothered about such details
Depends on what was the course about. If it’s about computation, then sure. If it’s about OOP or architecture design (this one I wouldn’t expect, unfortunately, but would be nice if it was taught somewhere), then the point is not just to run something.
I mostly come to prefer composition, this approach apparently even has a wiki page. But that’s in part because I use Rust that forbids inheritance, and don’t have such bullshit (from delegation wiki page):
class A {
void foo() {
// "this" also known under the names "current", "me" and "self" in other languages
this.bar();
}
void bar() {
print("a.bar");
}
}
class B {
private delegate A a; // delegation link
public B(A a) {
this.a = a;
}
void foo() {
a.foo(); // call foo() on the a-instance
}
void bar() {
print("b.bar");
}
}
a = new A();
b = new B(a); // establish delegation between two objects
Calling b.foo() will result in b.bar being printed, since this refers to the original receiver object, b, within the context of a. The resulting ambiguity of this is referred to as object schizophrenia
Translating the implicit this into an explicit parameter, the call (in B, with a a delegate) a.foo() translates to A.foo(b), using the type of a for method resolution, but the delegating object b for the this argument.
Why would one substitute b
as this
when called from b.a
is beyond me, seriously.
Even if it is not their fault, what people see is that they provide bad quality service. Very low percentage ofthem will care to read details when Netflix publishes a post-mortem of an issue, assuming they even do.
I feel like ‘a half is one-third more than a third’ is ambiguous and same as in ‘X is N% more than Y’ one may use X or Y as 100%
I’m sure that one interpretation is more common, but I don’t think that it is exclusively correct
I thought Zaktor wrote “I voted for Harris” how’s that “held back eir vote”?
Only surviving ones
But honestly, I admire the fact that you care about grammar, spelling, and such. This seems not very rare on Lemmy, but is otherwise a rare sight
in which case, enjoy your privilege
…for now
Am I right in my understanding that the ‘super high’ turnout of 2020 was still less than 50% of eligible voters? That really looks like maybe a minimum turnout threshold should exist :(
Problem is it took Roman empire hundreds of years of decline, the world now sure is faster but it can still take a lot of time for contemporary empires to fall
I tried to learn assembly for that, but never did after all
I should have added a ‘/s’, but I thought it is somewhat obvious, it really reminds of all the ‘git gud at C instead of doing Rust’
It’s a dig at people who don’t want to switch to memory-safe languages like rust.
Now that’s a stretch, it could be anything (no, it couldn’t, although I think this may have application to some other pairs of languages)
Well then they will have to slightly extend the term (until death do them part)
you can just say
Americanspeople, everyone will knowwhoyou’re talking about USA.
Fixed this for you. Kind of a pet peeve of mine when people use ‘defaults’, like everyone on the internet are in America, or if you’re talking to someone from a capital of a different country they will assume you’re also in the capital, everyone lives in America timezone, everyone using English uses en_US locale, and if by some bizarre chance you’re in another country you can only switch language and country together, etc
Probably not, but then it also shouldn’t come as a surprise that you being annoyed will have little impact
Read it as ‘we have at least stable democracy’, hung for a few moments
There are many regexes that validate email, and they usually aren’t compliant with the RFC, there are some details in the very old answer on SO. So, better not validate and just send a confirmation, than restrict and lock people out, imo