Tehran has enough material to make at least 10 nuclear warheads but extracting it would be very risky, say experts

The Trump administration is reportedly considering the deployment of special forces into Iran to secure its stockpile of highly enriched uranium (HEU), which experts say could be used to make at least 10 nuclear warheads.

Preventing Iran from acquiring a bomb is one of Trump’s stated war aims, and the 440kg HEU stockpile represents the greatest nuclear threat as it could be turned into weapons-grade uranium relatively easily. The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has told Congress that “people are going to have to go and get it”.

Rubio did not go into greater detail, but there have been US and Israeli reports on discussions between the two countries on how such a mission might be carried out by special forces from either or both militaries. But nuclear experts say the complexity and risk involved would be considerable.

MBFC
Archive

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I am a little confused about all this as all of the analysts claim that this material is literally under tons of rubble. Are the special forces going to be bringing excavators and cranes?

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So, we all understand that the recent reporting of “weighing” and “considering” and “exploring” probably means that US boots are already on the ground inside Iran, right?

    • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      I expect if any US soldiers were on the ground in Iran, Iran would release a video of the prisoners

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The nuclear stockpile that Trump said was destroyed over a year ago in a previous strike? And which probably didn’t exist in the first place?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I feel like if Iran really wants nukes fast, they should just ship that uranium and some cash to NK to have it enriched to weapons grade.

    Maybe exchange the missile technology for their warhead design too.

    Cuz even though we already are highly aware the US is lying when they say it could be refined super easily in the middle of a war, any attempt to do so would immediately get noticed and promptly bombed.

    Actually a funnier idea would be to place a bunch of fake inflatable enrichment cylinders in some random location in the mountains so that the US and Israel waste their muntions on a fake encirchment facility lol.

    Not even to protect the real one, just to make them turn their attention away from everything else and bomb an empty mountain.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not even a weapon of mass destruction but a literal pile of radioactive metal that “could” be turned into a bomb.

    This is about imaginary as you could possibly get. Truly war theatre for the masses that are apparently dumb enough to believe it.

  • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So, let me get this straight. The US and Israel started a war, allegedly, to stop the Iranian nuclear bomb project, without any actual plan on how to remove the nuclear programme assets?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Also, they boasted that their bombing of Iran last year had completely destroyed Iran’s nuclear program. And the experts say there never even was an Iranian nuclear bomb program worth the name.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Preventing Iran from acquiring a bomb is one of Trump’s stated war aims

    Something that could have been achieved through continued negotiations, resulting in far fewer lives lost and less money wasted. Assassinating Iran’s leaders and threatening to invade only serves to bolster their justifications for seeking nuclear weapons in the first place.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s also something they claimed to have achieved last year when they bombed Iran.

    • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 hours ago

      At this point Iran having the bomb would be more stabilizing for the region than if they are prevented from it.

      • sepi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I predict the US will sell Iran some bombs ro bring stability back to the region. I’ll bet 2 dimes and a nickel on this.

    • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Right! Every time I see something like this I wonder that people don’t realise the terrain around Tehran and the north-west. A ground invasion against Iran would make Afghanistan look like a picnic in comparison.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That was the enrichment facility, but Iran won’t have kept the output it generated prior to it being bombed there.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I voted for Trump because I was tired of Wars and now I need to vote Trump AGAIN to Stop the War that Trump started To Protect the State of Pedophiles!

    -Literally EVERYONE who Votes Republican!

  • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yet…yet… there are sources in the government who have been in closed door meetings say the real reasons have nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

    So one is the narrative they’re selling, the other is the truth.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m putting my money on the narrative that they clearly didn’t plan for and are still trying to figure out being the fake one.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The real narrative may have just been that Netanyahu has always wanted to destroy Iran and Trump was stupid and vain enough to be persuaded to do it for him. Since Trump can’t admit a mistake, he has to double down.