Off-and-on trying out an account over at @[email protected] due to scraping bots bogging down lemmy.today to the point of near-unusability.

  • 55 Posts
  • 1.31K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • Lawmaker Antoine Vermorel-Marques had earlier on Wednesday pointed out listings on Shein’s site for weapons including brass knuckles, which are banned in France, and an axe.

    I would not be incredibly surprised if someone in Europe could get brass knuckles from here in the US, where they’re no big deal.

    kagis

    https://www.brassknucklescompany.com/

    Let’s see. Brass knuckles. Vintage design replica brass knuckles. Stealth knuckles to bypass metal detectors. WW1 combination brass knuckles/trench knives. Oversized brass knuckles weighing over a pound. Electrified brass knuckles stun gun.

    OUTSIDE THE USA:

    Most non-US orders arrive without a problem but we recommend that you check your local laws regarding the products you intend to order. All of our shipments go out in plain boxes or envelopes with no mention of our company name. Most orders arrive without a problem.

    Discreet Packaging

    We ship in plain white envelopes or USPS Priority Mail packaging.







  • Why is so much coverage of “AI” devoted to this belief that we’ve never had automation before (and that management even really wants it)?

    I’m going to set aside the question of whether any given company or a given timeframe or a given AI-related technology in particular is effective. I don’t really think that that’s what you’re aiming to address.

    If it just comes down to “Why is AI special as a form of automation? Automation isn’t new!”, I think I’d give two reasons:

    It’s a generalized form of automation

    Automating a lot of farm labor via mechanization of agriculture was a big deal, but it mostly contributed to, well, farming. It didn’t directly result in automating a lot of manufacturing or something like that.

    That isn’t to say that we’ve never had technologies that offered efficiency improvements across a wide range of industries. Electric lighting, I think, might be a pretty good example of one. But technologies that do that are not that common.

    kagis

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity-improving_technologies

    This has some examples. Most of those aren’t all that generalized. They do list electric lighting in there. The integrated circuit is in there. Improved transportation. But other things, like mining machines, are not generally applicable to many industries.

    So it’s “broad”. Can touch a lot of industries.

    It has a lot of potential

    If one can go produce increasingly-sophisticated AIs — and let’s assume, for the sake of discussion, that we don’t run into any fundamental limitations — there’s a pathway to, over time, automating darn near everything that humans do today using that technology. Electrical lighting could clearly help productivity, but it clearly could only take things so far.

    So it’s “deep”. Can automate a lot within a given industry.







  • Well, if it’s not doing anything, I’d probably reboot. Then re-run whatever the command is that triggered the update.

    Worst case, if you can’t boot up to a graphical environment, I expect that you can probably boot it into a non-graphical “rescue mode” or similar from GRUB. I dunno if Fedora shows it by default, but IIRC holding shift should stop boot at GRUB, or tapping an arrow key when it’s up. It’ll let you log in as root. When you do, just repeat whatever command was used to trigger the update.





  • My understanding is that America doesn’t actually have 5G telco equipment manufacturers — it’s a weak point in the US tech lineup — which is one reason that there was such a major kerfuffle several years back over it. The US does not want China in its sensitive telco infrastructure. There was some point I remember where some US senator said that if Europe wasn’t going to support Nokia or Ericsson — Europe does have some entrants – and just let Huawei take the 5G market, that the US would need to buy one of them. There was some real concern from the US that Europe might just accept ceding the 5G provider market, which would make the US dependent on China.

    kagis

    This is probably what I remember. I could have sworn that it was a senator, but maybe there were multiple statements or it was actually AG Barr.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/white-house-dismisses-idea-of-us-buying-nokia-ericsson-to-challenge-huawei-idUSKBN2012A5/

    White House dismisses idea of U.S. buying Nokia, Ericsson to challenge Huawei

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Mike Pence on Friday and the top White House economic adviser dismissed an unusual suggestion from U.S. Attorney General William Barr that the United States consider taking control of two major foreign rivals of China-based Huawei Technologies Co Ltd.

    White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow added later on Friday that the United States was working closely with Nokia and Ericsson, saying the companies’ equipment was essential to the buildout of 5G infrastructure. But he said the “U.S. government is not in the business of buying companies, whether they’re domestic or foreign,” adding that “there’s nothing to prohibit American tech companies from acquiring” them.

    “That’s the plan the president has endorsed and will be carrying forward,” Pence said, adding that the United States can expand 5G “by using the power of the free market and American companies.”

    In a remarkable statement underscoring how far the United States may be willing to go to counter Huawei, Barr on Thursday disclosed proposals “by the United States aligning itself with Nokia and/or Ericsson.”

    EDIT: IIRC, Cisco or some other US company that I can’t remember made some 5G hardware, but they weren’t on par with Nokia and Ericsson.



  • If you’re being rigorous, a “CLI” app is a program that one interacts with entirely from a shell command line. One types the command and any options in (normally) a single line in bash or similar. One hits enter, the program runs, and then terminates.

    On a Linux system, a common example would be ls.

    Some terminal programs, often those that use the curses/ncurses library, are run, but then one can also interact with them in other ways. This broader class of programs is often called something like “terminal-based” “console-based”, or "text-based`, and called “TUI” programs. One might press keys to interact with them while they run, but it wouldn’t necessarily be at a command line. They might have menu-based interfaces, or use various other interfaces.

    On a Linux system, some common examples might be nano, mc, nmtui or top.

    nmtui and nmcli are actually a good example of the split. nmcli is a client for Network Manager that takes some parameters, runs, prints some output, and terminates. nmtui runs in a terminal as well, but one uses it theough a series of menus.


  • If by “CLI”", you just mean “terminal”, I’ve used ellama in emacs as a frontend to ollama and llama.cpp. Emacs, can run on a terminal, and that’s how I use it.

    If you specifically want “CLI”, I’m sure that there are CLI clients out there. Be almost zero functionality, though.

    Usually a local LLM server, what does the actual computation, is a faceless daemon, has clients talk to it over HTTP.

    EDIT: llama-cli can run on the commandline for a single command and does the computation itself. It’ll probably have a lot of overhead, though, if you’re running a bunch of queries in a row — the time to load a model is significant.