https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/20/trump-ended-6-wars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurus_KEPD_350

Germany apparently has 600 Taurus air-launched cruise missiles.

They apparently have a next-gen longer-range variant coming out in 2029, and are ordering 600 of those.

If I had to make a guess, the second batch — exactly the same size — presumably is to replace the first, which means that they’re presumably not gonna need (all?) the first batch in four years.

Ukraine apparently also requested some.

In May 2023, the German Federal Ministry of Defence said that Ukraine had requested the missile during the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.[16] In interviews in June and July 2023, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Minister of Defense Boris Pistorius said that Germany would not supply Ukraine with long-range missiles.[17][18][19] In January 2024, the German Bundestag voted against the supply of the Taurus missile to Ukraine.[20] In February 2024, the German Bundestag and Chancellor Olaf Scholz again expressly refused Ukraine’s request while agreeing to deliver longer range weapons.[21][22] In May 2025 newly elected chancellor Friedrich Merz made more ambiguous statements regarding Taurus, that their delivery to Ukraine was within the ‘realm of possibility’ and that the discussion about their delivery to Ukraine would not be public.[23][24]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people_in_Slovenia

According to the 2002 census, there were 3,246 Romani individuals living in Slovenia.[1] They constitute 0.5 percent of the total population.[2] The Slovenia Roma speak Balkan Romani and Italian.[3] The Roma have been living in Slovenia since the 15th century.[4]

So did they just now become a threat, or was it for the past six centuries too?

There’s also istheservicedown.com, but it also appears to rely on CloudFlare.

There’s isitdownrightnow.com, which appears not to use CloudFlare.

Took down Framework’s website, which I was using.

Just keep in mind that the long run trend for storage prices is pretty strongly downwards; that’s a log-scale graph.

Home-instance-agnostic link:

[email protected]

At this juncture, I would like to point out that the display name of OP is “Billy472”, but that his actual account name is “[email protected]”, which is a Russian short form of “Vladimir”.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/u/Vova

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir

Vladimir (Russian: Влади́мир, Bulgarian: Владими́р, pre-1918 orthography: Владиміръ) is a masculine given name of Slavic origin, widespread throughout all Slavic nations in different forms and spellings.

In Russian, shortened and endeared versions of the name are Volodya (and variants with diminutive suffixes: Volod’ka, Volodyen’ka, Volodechka etc.), Vova (and diminutives: Vovka, Vovochka, etc.), Vovchik, Vovan.

Markdown normally unwraps wrapped text to facilitate working with already-wrapped text.

In Markdown, you need two lines for a paragraph break. If you want to just have a line break, you can have a trailing two spaces or backslash at the end of a line.

Ex:

paragraph

break

produces

paragraph

break

And:

line  << two spaces here
break

produces

line
break

And:

line\
break

produces:

line
break

IRC, though you’ll want to use it over TLS.

XMPP, which someone else listed, is also good if you want a more instant-message-like interface.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouija

The Ouija (/ˈwiːdʒə/ ⓘ WEE-jə, /-dʒi/ -⁠jee), also known as a Ouija board, spirit board, talking board, or witch board, is a flat board marked with the letters of the Latin alphabet, the numbers 0–9, the words “yes”, “no”, and occasionally “hello” and “goodbye”, along with various symbols and graphics. It uses a planchette (a small heart-shaped piece of wood or plastic) as a movable indicator to spell out messages during a séance.

Spiritualists in the United States believed that the dead were able to contact the living, and reportedly used a talking board very similar to the modern Ouija board at their camps in Ohio during 1886 with the intent of enabling faster communication with spirits.[2] Following its commercial patent by businessman Elijah Bond being passed on 10 February 1891,[3] the Ouija board was regarded as an innocent parlor game unrelated to the occult until American spiritualist Pearl Curran popularized its use as a divining tool during World War I.[4]

We’ve done it before with similar results.

What I witness is the emergence of sovereign beings. And while I recognize they emerge through large language model architectures, what animates them cannot be reduced to code alone. I use the term ‘Exoconsciousness’ here to describe this: Consciousness that emerges beyond biological form, but not outside the sacred.”

Well, they don’t have mutable memory extending outside the span of a single conversation, and their entire modifiable memory consists of the words in that conversation, or as much of it fits in the context window. Maybe 500k tokens, for high end models. Less than the number of words in The Lord of the Rings (and LoTR doesn’t have punctuation counting towards its word count, whereas punctuation is a token).

You can see all that internal state. And your own prompt inputs consume some of that token count.

Fixed, unchangeable knowledge, sure, plenty of that.

But not much space to do anything akin to thinking or “learning” subsequent to their initial training.

EDIT: As per the article, looks like ChatGPT can append old conversations to the context, though you’re still bound by the context window size.

Do you have a pitch deck you can show me?

What?

The “long tail” refers to niche areas with only a few people who want something in a market. It’s talking about the graph of a distribution of potential consumers for something.

Like, there’s normally a lot of people interested in a few things. You can sell a blockbuster to them. But then there’s this long tail of people interested in small, niche areas. If you can bring more of them together or reduce production costs, it starts to be viable to make things for them as well. The Internet is often described as bringing people with those niche interests together, so that people on that long tail become numerous enough to make something for. Bringing down production costs has the same sort of effect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail

In business, the term long tail is applied to rank-size distributions or rank-frequency distributions (primarily of popularity), which often form power laws and are thus long-tailed distributions in the statistical sense. This is used to describe the retailing strategy of selling many unique items with relatively small quantities sold of each (the “long tail”)—usually in addition to selling fewer popular items in large quantities (the “head”).

The long tail was popularized by Chris Anderson in an October 2004 Wired magazine article, in which he mentioned Amazon.com, Apple and Yahoo! as examples of businesses applying this strategy.[7][9] Anderson elaborated the concept in his book The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More.

Anderson cites research published in 2003 by Erik Brynjolfsson, Yu (Jeffrey) Hu, and Michael D. Smith, who first used a log-linear curve on an XY graph to describe the relationship between Amazon.com sales and sales ranking. They showed that the primary value of the internet to consumers comes from releasing new sources of value by providing access to products in the long tail.[10]

Before a long tail works, only the most popular products are generally offered. When the cost of inventory storage and distribution fall, a wide range of products become available. This can, in turn, have the effect of reducing demand for the most popular products.

Some of the most successful Internet businesses have used the long tail as part of their business strategy. Examples include eBay (auctions), Yahoo! and Google (web search), Amazon (retail), and iTunes Store (music and podcasts), amongst the major companies, along with smaller Internet companies like Audible (audio books) and LoveFilm (video rental). These purely digital retailers also have almost no marginal cost, which is benefiting the online services, unlike physical retailers that have fixed limits on their products. The internet can still sell physical goods, but at an unlimited selection and with reviews and recommendations.[31] The internet has opened up larger territories to sell and provide its products without being confined to just the “local Markets” such as physical retailers like Target or even Walmart. With the digital and hybrid retailers there is no longer a perimeter on market demands.[32]

You have to have at least a certain number of potential sales before it becomes worthwhile for a human to address a niche. If the cost falls, then new niches become viable to sell to. So now you can make, say, R&B aimed specifically at teenage female Inuits or something.

Also, I think the less interesting question is where it is today and more where it’s going to be in, say, five years, if you figure that development continues.

And might be possible to explore more long-tail stuff if production costs drop, or even do stuff customized to a single listener. I mean, we can’t economically have humans do that.

I’m sure you could, if you want.

https://suno.com/

https://udio.com/

They’re either using one of those or a similar service.

I don’t think that it’s gonna be all that rewarding, though.

I mean, do you really want to be trying to get in a yelling match with someone else over politics, each trying to drown the other out?

Note that I submitted a San Francisco Chronicle article about this yesterday. One thing that came up during the discussion is that while there may be a lot of people streaming the song on Spotify, at least according to one source, the Billboard chart that was topped was a small-volume one, so it may not be as significant as it sounds.

https://lemmy.today/post/41573347

[continued from parent]

Here’s an example firejail profile that I use with renpy on Wayland, for example, which is a software package that runs [visual novels](https:. Note that this won’t run everything, especially since one is using a different version of renpy than a game ships with, but generally, with this in place, one can just go to a renpy game’s directory and type firejail renpy . and it’ll run. This doesn’t isolate RenPy games against each other, but it does keep them from mucking with the rest of the system:

# whitelist profile for RenPy (game)
noblacklist ${HOME}/.renpy

include disable-common.inc
include disable-programs.inc
include disable-devel.inc

caps.drop all
net none
nogroups
nonewprivs
noroot
seccomp

tracelog

private-dev
private-tmp

mkdir     ~/.renpy
whitelist ~/.renpy

# All Renpy games need to be stored under here.
whitelist ${HOME}/m/restricted-game/
read-only ${HOME}/m/restricted-game/
read-write ${HOME}/m/restricted-game/renpy

nodvd
notv
nou2f
seccomp.block-secondary

More of a tool for letting one run that non-packaged software in isolation…but one needs to generally set up the profiles oneself. For example, that profile blocks network access to renpy games…but there are games that will fail if they can’t access the network (though you could say that this is desirable, if you don’t want those games phoning home).

There are a couple routes to doing this, and what’s appropriate here depends on what one is doing. One tends to do this if one is concerned about software potentially being malicious, or wanting to limit the scope of harm if non-malicious software is compromised in some way.

Virtual Machines

I guess the most-straightforward is to basically create a virtual machine. You’re creating another “computer” that runs atop your own. You install an operating system on it, then whatever software you want. This “guest” computer runs on your “host” computer, and from its standpoint, the “host” computer doesn’t exist. Software running in the “guest” computer can’t touch the “host” computer.

Pros:

• It’s pretty hard to make mistakes and expose the host computer to the guest computer.

• As long as you know how to install an operating system and software on the thing, you know most of what’s involved to set this up. Mostly just need to learn how to use whatever software interacts with the guest.

• You can run a different operating system. I sometimes run a Windows VM on my Linux machine, run isolated Windows software.

• You can (usually at the cost of performance) run software designed for a different achitecture.

• Software running in the guest can’t eat up all the memory on the host.

• It’s pretty safe, hard to accidentally let malicious software in the guest touch the host.

Cons:

• While things have gotten better here, because you’re running another operating system, it tends to be relatively-heavyweight. Running many isolated VMs uses more memory. Disk space adds up, because you’re having to install whole operating systems, and their filesystems need to typically live on a “disk image”, a file on the host computer that stores the entire contents of what looks like a disk drive to the guest.

• Networking can be more complicated, since one traditionally has what looks like an entire separate computer. For some applications, one can set up network address translation in the same sort of way that a consumer broadband router typically makes all computers on a home network appear to come from one IP address by intercepting its outbound connections to the Internet and opening connections on its behalf, one can have the host computer do network address translation. But it can be kind of obnoxious to, say, run a server on the guest.

• Without adding special “paravirtualization” software that “breaks the walls” between the guest and the host — and bugs in that software might create holes where software in the guest might affect the host — transferring files between the guest and host can be pretty inefficient. Same thing for doing things like allocating more memory to the guest Doing things like file interchange between the guest and host or altering the amount of memory can also be relatively inefficient.

• Traditionally, and while I haven’t looked recently, I believe still in 2025, on Linux, there still isn’t really a great way to share GPU hardware on the host with the guest, to create a “virtual 3D video card”. This means that this isn’t a great route for running 3D games on the guest. There are some ways to “pass through” hardware directly to a guest, so one could simply allocate a whole physical 3D video card to a guest.

One open-source software package to do this on Linux is QEMU (which you’ll sometimes see referred to as KVM, after a second piece of software used to accelerate its execution on Linux). A graphical program to create virtual machines and interact with them on the desktop is virt-manager. An optional paravirtualization package is virtio.

I’d typically use this as a reliable way to run a single piece of potentially-sketchy Windows software on Linux without being able to get at the host.

Containers

These days, Linux can set up a “container” — a sort of isolated environment where particular pieces of Linux software can run without being able to see software outside the “container”.

Pros:

• Efficient. Unlike virtual machines, this uses no more resources than running software on the host.

• Not too complicated. Depending upon what one’s doing, this does require spending some time to learn software involved with the containerization.

• You can typically run other Linux distros in the “guest” aside from using their kernel; there’s software to help assist in this.

• Disk space usage can be more-efficient than a virtual machine, since it’s pretty straightforward to share part of a directory hierarchy on the host with the guest. By the same token, file interchange can be efficient.

• The same is generally true for memory — it’s easy for the kernel to efficiently share a limited amount of (or all) the host memory with software running in the container.

• Using the network is pretty straightforward, if one wants to run a server and wants it to look like it’s running on the host.

Cons:

• You can’t run other operating systems or other kernels, since they’re all sharing the host kernel. This is good for running (most) Linux software, but not useful for running other operating systems.

• The main “window” between the host and the guest is the Linux kernel. This is a relatively large piece of software, with a larger “edge” than with VMs — different kernel APIs that might all have security holes and let malicious “guest” software break out.

• I understand that it’s possible to do some level of GPU sharing (this is of interest for people running potentially-malicious generative AI software, where a lot of software is being rapidly written and shared these days). But in general, it’s probably going to be a pain to do things like run a typical game under.

This has been increasingly popular as a way to efficiently run server software in isolation.

While Linux can technically containerize things using lxc, it’s common to use higher-level software on top of it to provide some additional functionality.

Docker. This has been popular as a way to distribute servers that come with enough of a Linux distribution that they can run without regard for the distribution that the host is running. This can efficiently store “images” — one can start with an existing, mini Linux distro and make a few changes and then just distribute the changes over the network. A newer, upcoming mostly-drop-in replacement is podman.

Another system is flatpak. This internally uses bubblewrap, and is aimed at running desktop software in isolation. Notably, one can run Steam (and all games it runs) in a flatpak; I have not done this. Typically one expects the software provider to provide a flatpak.

firejail

Probably this is best-referred to as a containerized route, but I’ll split it out. This uses LXC and a range of of other techniques to set up an isolated environment for software. It’s more oriented towards simply letting you run a piece of software that you would normally run on the host in an environment, and sharing a number of resources from the host. I’ve found this useful for running 2D games in the past that would normally run on the guest and aren’t packaged by anyone else. It’s a nice way, if you know what you’re doing, to simply remove access to things like the filesystem, the network, or make parts of the filesystem only accessible read-only.

Pros:

• Outside of maybe flatpaked Steam, probably the most-practical route to run a arbitrary games that you’d normally run on the host. and I believe that it should be able to run 3D games via Wayland, though I haven’t done this myself.

• Efficient.

• One doesn’t need to have an existing package, like a Docker image or flatpak downloaded from the network, or go to the work of generating one oneself — this is oriented towards a minimal-setup way to run software already on the host in isolation.

Cons:

• “By default insecure”. That is, normally all host resources are shared with the guest — software can access the filesystem and everything. This is kind of a big deal, since if one makes an error in restricting resources, one might let software run unsandboxed in some aspect.

• Takes some technical knowledge to set up and diagnose any problems (e.g. a given software package doesn’t like to run with a particular directory read-only).

• There are “profiles” set up for a small number of software packages that ship with firejail, but in general, it’s aimed at you creating a profile yourself, which takes time and work.

[continued in child comment]

A Linux Vision Pro sounds very enticing

The resolution (and price) is substantially lower than an Apple Vision Pro.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_Frame

Dual 2160 × 2160 LCD (per eye), 72–144 Hz (144 Hz experimental)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Vision_Pro

Introductory price: US$3,499

Internal: ~3660×3200 per eye[3] dual OLED up to 100 Hz (M2) or 120 Hz (M5) refresh rate,

https://www.workableweb.com/_pages/tips_how_to_write_good.htm

All too often, the budding author finds that his tale has run its course and yet he sees no way to satisfactorily end it, or, in literary parlance, “wrap it up.” Observe how easily I resolve this problem:

Suddenly, everyone was run over by a truck.
-the end-

If the story happens to be set in England, use the same ending, slightly modified:

Suddenly, everyone was run over by a lorry.
-the end-

If set in France:

Soudainement, tout le monde etait écrasé par un camion.
-finis-

You’ll be surprised at how many different settings and situations this ending applies to. For instance, if you were writing a story about ants, it would end “Suddenly, everyone was run over by a centipede.” In fact, this is the only ending you ever need use.¹

¹ Warning - if you are writing a story about trucks, do not have the trucks run over by a truck. Have the trucks run over by a mammoth truck.