• ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 seconds ago

    ‘God demands equal justice’

    Let me respond to that idiocy with a lyric from Nine Inch Nails: “Your god is dead and no one cares…”

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Well, isn’t that weird. I guess all the gaslighting xtians were wrong? They were lecturing everyone on Tone And Civility both before and right after Trollito’s corrupted court overturned 50 years of law.

    Saying that talking about Gilead States was just being unreasonable and hysterical. That they didn’t want to kill women or doctors or anything…

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The very first time I debated a christian about this, in 1992, I asked them what about back alley abortions, and he said he would charge all concerned, the conceivers and the abortionists, with murder.

    They’ve been telling us the whole time this was their ultimate intention.

  • Didntdoit71@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Okay…but first…death penalty for Epstein pedophiles. Then, we try every politician listed in those files for pedophile crimes. Try them, not necessarily convict…because they might be innocent…maybe…let the juries decide…then execute everyone found guilty of pedophilia with Epstein… I’m willing to bet - there won’t be many Republicans left to pass laws like this.

  • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    ““The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.”

    [Methodist Pastor David Barnhart]

  • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Actually God only demands a monetary fine if you cause a miscarriage in someone who didn’t want one (Exodus 21), and requires that you drink a potion that will give you a miscarriage if you got pregnant by someone who isn’t your husband (Numbers 5). If only those Republicans could read their own Bible, they would be very upset.

    • Deacon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That it is a monetary fine is really crucial as one of two ways of establishing that the Mosaic law that Christians leverage for their legalism does not consider an unborn fetus a person.

      First, as noted, the fine for a miscarriage is monetary only if no harm comes to the woman. If the woman is hurt, the Mosaic concept of reciprocal justice (eye for eye, etc), which was likely borrowed from the code of Hammurabi, kicks in. The death of an unborn fetus has no reciprocal punishment because that form of justice applies to people.

      The second way of establishing that an unborn fetus is not considered a person in the hebrew bible is right in the second version of the creation story in Genesis 2:7

      then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being (emphasis mine)

      So here first, and in various other places in the bible (and in the broader Greco-Roman culture in which the nascent Christianity would later form), life began at first breath.

    • Australis13@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Please be aware that those are common misrepresentations of those texts popularised by the NIV translation.

      Many translations show Exodus 21 demands life for life and a fine if the child survives but suffers injury. The NIV is one of several exceptions (although probably the most popular one) that instead translates it as a fine for a miscarriage (the original NASB also said this, but the 1995 revision corrected it).

      Numbers 5 is a religious test and requires God to enact punishment. The “potion” has no abortifacient components and commentaries suggest that the punishment was infertility. The NIV is again an exception here suggesting miscarriage when most other translations (eg. NKJV, NASB, RSV, ESV, Amplified, Young’s Literal, etc.) do not.

      By all means call out their misuse of the Bible or their lack of consistency with it, but please be careful making claims like this – it just undermines credibility.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wait, this was a defense of the Bible and the people who use it to inform their beliefs about abortion???

        The fact that the meaning can be the complete opposite depending on what (modern) translation you use? Who’s credibility is being undermined here again?

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How much murder is it to bomb school kids in another country? We should seek the death penalty at the highest decision making levels for that.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    but… but… my fictional imaginary friend said I get to kill people because they won’t have my babies…

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Pro-life” has never been about protecting life. It was always a means to control women.

  • sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I feel like this is a good way to get violent insurrection from your population. If you start murdering peoples daughters and wives end masse people aren’t gonna just throw up their hands and be like “oh well”.

  • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Ah, yes, I remember this part of the Bible. If I remember correctly, the Romans laughed when Jesus promised revenge. And then He jumped off the cross and killed every single person at Golgotha without mercy. And then He marched on Rome and decapitated Emperor Tiberius with His own hands for attempting to stop Jesus. They don’t call Him “Vengeful Christ” for nothing.

    It stands to reason, then, that the Republicans must exact revenge, as Jesus would’ve done.

    • Sassington@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m more enamoured by the last stand when Jesus was arrested.

      When the Romans came to arrest Jesus with Malhcus, the high servant of the Jewish High Priest.

      Peter drew his sword in defence of Jesus and severs Malhcus ear.

      On seeing this Jesus responded 'The cup my father has given me is empty shall we fill it?"

      He then put his hand on Malhcus and said “Suffer ye thus” and snapped Malhcus’s neck with a sickening crack.