• rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Of course they do, especially when the number of people is ambiguous or when they are speaking about someone titled as a profession such as “I went to the doctor and they said…”

    It is all a manufactured situation used to push hate and attack the marginalised. Singular they has been around for a very long time and there were options before they was they, not to mention in all the other myriad languages in the world.

  • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My English teacher back in highschool was very picky about using “they” like most people do. I can hear him say “you have to use FORMAL LANGUAGE” in my head still lol

    If it’s an unknown person we were told to use “he or she” instead of “they” and “his or her” instead of “their” despite the fact that no one fucking talks that way when referring to an unknown individual.

    Like even saying “everyone should bring their laptop to class” would be marked wrong because “everyone” is singular so the “correct” version is “everyone should bring his or her laptop to class” which imo is way more confusing

    However, he was also fine with us using masculine singular pronouns when the gender of a person wasn’t known, which I guess is kind of the case in like Spanish and some other Latin languages but still, just really weird rules

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      so the “correct” version is “everyone should bring his or her laptop to class” which imo is way more confusing

      Only if you’re used to hearing it the wrong way.

      ‘Emails’[sic] probably sounds more ‘correct’ to you, even though it’s like ‘deers’ and ‘happies’.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve started yelling “NO PRONOUNS” and “USE HE/SHE BECAUSE HE/SHE IS NOT AN OBJECT” at my conservative relatives and acquaintances who complain about pronouns and gender-neutral anything.

    No, Deborah, the non-binary person who helped you figure out your phone today is not the cause of societies’ downfall, nor are they responsible for high grocery prices.

    They complain about pronouns, but use them constantly. Clearly they don’t truly know what a pronoun is. They complain about gender neutral stuff, but use neutral language all the time.

    So I’ve been loudly pointing out every time they do.

    I’ve been uninvited from a lot of future family gatherings. oh nooooooooooo

  • FBJimmy@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The thing that really grinds my gears is the excessive use of “he/she”. Workplace training is a regular offender for this. Just use the word “they” FFS, it’s sat right there on the shelf for you.

    Or don’t, just go with “he” or “she”, this fictional person in your ‘case study’ isn’t real, they don’t give a shit.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Some academic fields a decade or two ago went through a phase where they intentionally used “she” for all pronouns. The idea was because academia was so male dominated, even a neutral pronoun would still make people inagine a male lab worker, statistician, etc when reading. Intentionally using “she” was thought to force people to imagine a woman and normalise that image.

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Reminds me of Ancillary Justice / The Imperial Radch series. Every once in a while you get hints like “she could tell this person had a specific gender in this culture based on how she wore her facial hair, but she could never remember” because the main character (and most of the story) is in the context of a society where gender doesn’t exist and everyone is referred to with English feminine pronouns.

  • notreallyhere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    it genuinely causes confusion though, someone told me “they” (a different person), were going to be there early and I was like “they’re all going to come early?!”

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They usually only use it for unknown people though, which is why it sounds strange to them to use for a known person.

    • podian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This contextual nuance is mostly lost or went over the heads of young learners today, for better or for worse. I like to think that’s why “they” was word of the year for a few dictionaries in the last decade or two, for the benefit of young and old alike.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wish my English teachers didn’t beat me up so hard (figuratively) as incorrect use of ‘they’ when it has a long history of usage in the singular.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m really curious as to how singular they started being taught as incorrect. I really don’t think it was originally intended to be transphobic.

  • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    On the other hand, some people blow their tops when I match singular they to singular verb forms. I think people just like getting angry.

  • geekwithsoul@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And it goes back to at least Chaucer, so it’s been in recorded use for like six centuries. Most definitely not “new”.

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Better than some languages like German, where even inanimate objects have gender. That would be nicer though.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s cute when someone with a first language like that carries it over to English. “The coffee maker… he is broken 😞” I’m so sad for him!

  • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    they have half a point in that its typically only applied to people when a gender is unknown or you are referring to a group. that falls apart pretty quick though because unknown gender is barely any different from someone choosing not to identify with one. also, half a point is no good in the first place.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t think this would’ve happened though if there hadn’t been the societal impetus that aided adoption. The singular they may have been around since Chaucer or Shakespeare - ~30 years ago, people didn’t really use it. There was far more “he or she” going on, that’s now been more commonly replaced with a “they,” also because it’s shorter. English benefits from the fact that the neutral pronoun slots right in to the existing grammar. Other languages struggle with finding such a neutral replacement because it’s more often than not a new word and a slightly altered grammatical function. English is okay on the first problem and arguably okay to mostly okay on the second.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think singular they was still used naturally and unconsciously even when it was taught to be incorrect. People don’t naturally say “he or she”

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Since both clauses are interdependent and incorrect on their own, the join here with merely a comma is entirely proper and not a comma slice