Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, said Monday that some Republicans are “on board” with potentially impeaching Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) failure to release all of its files related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by the congressionally mandated deadline.

Pointing out that Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, would be “leading” the effort if it moves forward, Khanna said during an interview with Morning Joe on MS Now that “there are a few Republicans who are on board with it.” However, he noted that this would not be the first step to pressure Bondi and the DOJ, highlighting that they’d first move forward with pushing to hold her in contempt of Congress.

  • zzz711@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This will end up exactly like the Trump impeachments from his first term. The house will impeach Bondi but the votes will not be there in the Senate to convict and remove her.

    • Ininewcrow@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      22 hours ago

      One thing I’ve learned about American politics is that hope doesn’t exist any more.

      Don’t tell me things about US politics until after they’ve happened.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They passed the bill to release the files, stands to reason that the same people would vote for impeachment.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They passed a bill riddled with loopholes that would allow these extended redactions. Stands to reason the same people will make a lot of noise about how disappointed they are, then kick the can through the next election cycle until its not their problem anymore.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They think they can get by on show because a significant portion of the Democratic base accepts pageantry in lieu of meaningful action.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Not gonna happen. Republicans just can’t help themselves. They will bend the knee to Dear Leader.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Republicans are known to readily throw loyal lackeys under the bus to protect their ringleaders. This could happen, but the person she is acting entirely on behalf of — Donald “The Rapist” Trump — will continue to get off scott-free.

      • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Unless he is literally flayed on live tv within the next couple months, his continued existence is an affront to the entire concept of karma. He’s already so old, and so influential, and so insulated by sycophants, he’s already crossed the finish line. He won. He has lived a life seemingly entirely devoid of regrets. He is potentially the greatest rapist of all time. Of women, of children, of society, of the nation, and of the future itself.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Good, so get on with it! No more talk, no more grace periods, she intentionally failed to comply with the Epstein file release legislation. No more waiting, talking, waffling. Start impeaching NOW, as in TODAY.

    • hopesdead@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      You realize impeachment isn’t the same as removing them from office, right?

      I.E. Bill Clinton was impeached but not removed from office.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Correct but impeachment is the first step towards removing from office. I’d still prefer the House impeach those deserving of removal and it failing in the Senate rather than the House just shrugging it off entirely because people expect the Senate won’t follow through.

        • sidelove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yup, plus it normalizes the action of starting to hold people accountable. If you get to the point where you’re regularly impeaching the corrupt bozos in this administration, it’s more likely that some of them will stick with convictions.

        • stretch2m@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’ve been hounding my representative about this. DO SOMETHING. IT MATTERS. He keeps yammering about how it’s not the right time. “It gives the opponent ammunition in claiming persecution.” Blah blah blah.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            67 votes in the Senate is a high bar. It is doubly complicated by a fundraising system where Senators relying on their party’s president and his sway over donors to fund their next election.

            Trump’s a symptom of much deeper problems we’ve been ignoring for decades

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Every GOP Congressmember and a third of the Senators will be up for re-election next year.

    Dropping the hammer on Bondi [and Trump] will be a smart way for them to try and stave off a Blue Wave.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They’re still trying to work out if Trump can get full unchecked power in time or not.

      When it happens, it will go from a trickle to a panic sprint to the exits, quickly.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think of it this way.

        If an alcoholic can’t get booze they’re way more likely to look for pot or meth or anything else, rather than go to treatment.

        Same thing with MAGA. Even if they dump Trump they aren’t going to want to quit the movement.

        Genii isn’t going back in the bottle.

  • MOARbid1@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And they will replace her with someone just as awful. They have these fascist fucks loaded up like a Pez dispenser. You pull one out and another loads in place.