Depends on where you think this is all going: Reaganomics or Genocide.

If it is Genocide you shouldn’t be discussing this, and should be forming resistance cells.

If you think it’s Reagonomics, visible protests can help form mutual aid networks and a collective action front that increases solidarity and save lives.

Two different approaches depending on where you think things are heading.

You’ll often find discussions in the comments section (also your first comment to me asked me to explain my views).

You seem deaf to what I’m saying. There are cultural tensions involved. Yes people choose their ethical compliances but those choices are always constrained by cultural, educational, and structural bounds. The cultural messaging of the time.

Before this generation were the first school shooters, before them it was satanic panic related crimes, before them it was the first post WW2 street gangs.

These are all topics that insert violence into cultural frameworks without having the necessary discussions of causes and the messaging around these frameworks.

I’d call your user name “weird”, but I’m not one to use social pressures like that, and would rather have conversations where the actual issues and causes are discussed.

I’m trying to normalize that singles aren’t having sex…

… because the feeling that young men not having sex is abnormal causes a bad mindset.

Yeah they think it’s extraordinary to not be having sex when single, so it’s women’s fault.

When being sexless is the majority of what being single means.

So the anti-terrorism laws have been used before and apply to all terrorism…

My comment is mocking that incel - which basically means single and upset about it, is being made central to the headline.

Just say he’s a misogynist. Pretending it’s something abnormal for single men to not be having sex just extends the premise of “incels” (the idea that they should be upset about it, or that it’s extra).

PNAT laws increase the severity of all terrorism related prosecutions. They aren’t aimed at “incels” in particular.

Hitler, great replacement, and communicating with women, aren’t incel traits. That last one in particular.

That’s far-right stuff.

Plenty of leftwing incels.

The perfect is the enemy of the good. They’re building habits, getting the numbers up. Practicing.

Incel describes most single people. It’s quite a normal state of affairs to not be having sex most of the time if you’re single. Young people need to be told this far more than they are being.

The charges were terror related, there’s no special extra charge or any new laws being used “for the first time” just because he was an incel…

…also he wasn’t an incel, he was a far-right praising hitler fear of the great replacement teenager.

Pretending that women sleeping with people like that will stop them doing crimes or is somehow a pivotal factor just extends the sex obsessed and objectifying beliefs of that world view.

Using the term incel amplifies the idea that it’s a valid idea.It’s a shitty headline, so I mocked it.

Incel describes most single people. It’s quite normal, we need to stop telling men it’s not normal.

deleted by creator

“We charge him with terrorism… Also this loser wasn’t getting enough pussy, which makes him uncool… So up the charges on that basis” -court transcript of new laws being implemented.

1 human leg = the mass of 3-4 cats.

So it’s understandable.

The world’s boycott of Russia resulted in Chinese brands getting a super strong foothood there. Shows how important maintaining a country’s manufacturing base is.

CEOs will be able to crowd source a replacement. Their financial position allows them the upper hand in a highly corrupt pay-to-play political system.

Society will thus go in the direction they choose, which will be to always have people like Trump around. People who are willing to use their reputation and efforts to steal from the poor and give to the wealthy.

Killing Trump is not just a good idea, but a necessary social control… and there still needs to be actions beyond that too.

The bill to make things more difficult.

Those ones tend to stake themselves eventually, or get obsessed with seeing sunlight “for real though”. They’re not in it for the long haul.

Or it’s not, and that’s the problem. The organised rightwing forces of state repression can easily push around a left that’s been trained and groomed to function as entirely beholden to corporate sponsors and big money donors.

…to the point it’s now visible and blatant that the establishment left cannot stand and legitimately claim even the possibility they are the solution.

Because the solution is something more revolutionary that will cause bloodshed and more regular interruptions to people’s daily lives.

So of course, keep your head down, hope none of this effects you. Ignore that it already has. The dems will fix it later, ect…

It’s understandable to ignore the civil war even though it’s not rational to.

Terrorists (freedom fighters) are made as needed, they’re not born ready. Trump’s administration will be looking to stay under that threshold.

The problem with this, and so many other problems in America right now - is that they’ll only ever be fixed by Democrats swinging the other direction.

The majority of whom will only go as far as they believe their corporate sponsors will allow. Preventing real progress.

This is the mechanism and economic base structure of “democracy” in the west which prevents real progress and real change from happening to the structures and systems we have.

The result? An ever increasing risk of populist fascism, which may become increasingly systemic in its use of deadly force and violent repression (yes, things can go further unless the structure itself is forced in the other direction - in a revolutionary manner).

To clarify: Only leftwing revolution can fix and prevent this happening again. Hence why Biden and establishment “leftists” were unable to prevent the current era - because it requires a revolutionary movement much further left to do these adjustments to democracy, rights, and the state of western politics.