• Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “No one in my generation had autism”

    Sure thing. Uncle Barry, who collects every issue of Mechanics Monthly, and has spent over $10,000 on his model train set that is a perfect scale recreation of King’s Cross Station, is completely neurotypical.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This response vexes me because while Uncle Barry here is certainly an example, what these people are forgetting (and what this thing about Uncle Barry glosses over) is that until the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the fights from the 70s onward, if a family in the US had a child with an IQ of under 70, they were often shipped off to an institution.

      Deinstitutionialization didn’t really begin to gain steam until relatively recently in our collective history- here in Tennessee we still had one of these facilities open until the nineties. These people didn’t believe there were people with severe mental disabilities, because our society hid them away!

      Look up Clover Bottom. But don’t, because it’s horrifying. I’ve met people who lived there their entire lives. What was done to them was disgusting.

      It is awful what was done to them. But it’s awful that people with a greater severity of condition, a greater need for care, are often glossed over in these comment sections. It feels like they’re made invisible in these conversations just like they were in those institutions! And I’m terrified that assholes like RFK Jr will disappear them for real!

    • Wytch@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I have a staunchly leftist but older co-worker who thinks no one she knew growing up had autism.

      “I still think something is causing it” despite being pro-vaxx.

      The propaganda is extremely effective unfortunately

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Considering how provaxx they where back then, it’s insane seeing people who grew up with polio repeating antivax shit.

        Like back in the day. No one got cancer…cause they didn’t know wtf it was, doesn’t mean the shit wasn’t around. Science didn’t stop in 1904.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Just on cancer as an example, there’s a solid argument to be made that it was historically diagnosed as a consumptive disease. My great great aunt died of cancer awhile back and she was practically wasting away.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            consumptions usually refers to TB, its has been called wasting sickness forever, because one of the symptoms of cancer(terminal) was cachexia which is your body wasting away. i found it interesting inuyasha mentioned its old term"wasting sickness" which immediately knew it was cancer.

              • Ledericas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                i remember consumption being the old name for Tuberculosis, its also known as the white death, due to people looking sickly and pallor when having the final stages of tb.

                wasting was always associated with cancer, and then HIV/AIDS. if you hear films using old terms like wasting sickness, you can bet its cancer.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Even bronze agers knew what cancer was, they just called it weird things.

            I’ll never forget looking at a virally trending obituary from the 15th century and seeing “Cancer, and Wolf” as a cause of death.

            If you look it up you’ll see other things like “King’s Evil” aka scrofula or jawfaln (lock jaw from tetanus)

          • Forester@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I’m pretty sure the over 1,000 atmospheric tests of nuclear weapons over the last hundred years had zero effect on background radiation levels and on levels of human contamination from eating radioactive fallout…

            I’m not saying we didn’t have cancer before but I would be very surprised if the rates are not elevated. Even counting misdiagnosises as consumptive illness.

            On a similar note, I do suspect that our current petrochemical heavy environment has changed the human microchoism enough to possibly make it more likely for some of the classical autism traits to be passed on generation to generation influencing their heritability in society at large. Sincerely, an artist with two autistic parents in denial. And at least three autistic grandparents.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        looks like she bought into the partly anti-vax prop, probably heard jenny mcarthny once about vaccines and she was hooked.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I really do think autism and cancer have gotten much more common. And it’s very likely something is causing it.

        Not vaccines. Vaccines are fine.

        Could be plastic. Could be pfas (forever chemicals). Could be lots of things, or a combination. But there’s most likely an environmental cause rather than genetic or just an increase in diagnosis. (Though the increase in diagnosis and recognition is also real.)

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          There’s also the fact that we have WAY better technology and techniques for discovering and understanding both autism and cancer nowadays compared to even 20 years ago.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m disappointed that Lemmy feels the need to downvote such a mild differing opinion that doesn’t even conflict with your own.

          All these things can be true. Diagnosis, treatment, and recognition are all much better; we agree there.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Modern society is making both mild autism and ADHD more obvious. It both brings out traits associated with them, and makes it more acceptable to have them and not mask completely.

          As for cancer, that’s mostly an age and treatment thing. People with cancer live longer, due to treatment, so you hear far more about it. Also, if you live longer, you get cancer. Therefore an older population has more cancer cases.

          My personal concern is neurological and plastics. People with degenerative neurological conditions tend to have more micro plastics in their brains. We’ve no idea of the long term implications of this. It could possibly be the modern equivalent of leaded petrol.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      and shoots steroids regurlarly, and is obssesed with playing with animal carcasses.