It’s a bit of a silly situation, I ran into it before when I created a flake for an unfree application. You can’t allow that unfree application in your nixpkgs system instantiation because the evaluation fails in the application flake; however, allowing that package there allows it on any system that uses the flake, even if they disallow unfree in their nixpkgs.
The input doesn’t really matter, it’s how the input is actually used in the flake. In fact it might be the overriding that is causing the issue in the first place when the flake you’re evaluating uses an older nixpkgs where the offensive package isn’t marked insecure yet and hence isn’t explicitly permitted, and then it fails because you’re overriding it with a nixpkgs where it is marked insecure.
I’m not sure this is the case here, but I once had it that an insecure package was a dependency of a package outside nixpkgs, in that case you need to allow the insecure package where the other package was defined. Your package whitelist only applies to your nixpkgs insurance, a non-nixpkgs package will use its own instance
His base by definition approves of him, the more interesting question is whether that base changes in size
If they weren’t, the headline probably wouldn’t have used the comparative
What you’re implying makes no sense.
The ships passing are not “NATO owned”. They’re most likely not even ships owned by the armed forces of NATO countries apart from the US. And even if they were attacked, this is outside of the territory of the NATO member state, which is a condition for triggering article 5.
Well, it doesn’t silently ignore files, it tells you if the work tree is dirty.
Though I’ve tripped over the different behaviors of the repl vs the rest of the tools myself in funny ways
That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn’t
I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you’re a member it doesn’t mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.
If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia’s borders? Surely a paper tiger isn’t detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?
Total disconnect from reality
He’s just preparing for an out, in a week or two he can tell on TV that Iran agreed to all demands and as such, the US gets out. Won’t work most likely, but maybe he’ll try.
That or he seriously believes this has happened because someone told him. Who knows! Or he might just contradict himself.
Debian systems have optionally collected this kind of data way before systemd existed via adduser.
As I said, he’s just flinging shit, it is dumb. But you have the same ideology on both sides, they’re very different cuts from the same cloth, so I don’t mind. There’s no real effect on common affairs, the connection between Japan declining to help and this isn’t there, no country is committing to any action in the strait.
Handpicked by Kegsbreath
The joke was almost more controversial than the fact that Japan who committed the possibly most heinous crimes against humanity in WWII never apologized or admitted to any wrongdoing.
yup he was flinging dumb shit but it hit the right target. Let the conservative nationalists fight each other. I can’t be outraged by this one
deleted by creator
An example of selection bias
“We asked a group of people defining themselves as approving of everything Trump does if they approve of this thing Trump did, and the results are overwhelming!” What would be more interesting is whether that actual group has stayed the same size ever since he made his latest decisions
WELL WELL WELL
Could the US lose in Vietnam? Of course not, they just got bored and left
Welp sorry for pushing you in the wrong direction