What’s Anti-Data? The equivalent to Anti-Matter? And how does an Anti-Data Center look like?

Interesting enough, the ruble is actually quite strong, which does create problems for Russia’s exports, while they are capped on imports by the sanctions so they can’t really make use of that

They got a very nice beer brewery in return so it’s all fair

Germany did opium business with China? When?

the cost of basic necessities like housing and food are about 3x cheaper.

Depends. Newly built apartments will set you back $200k after conversion there, some years ago it could easily reach $500k.

Why would Europe negotiate with Iran? The conflict is between Iran and the US. What kind of perspective should Europe offer?

Welp sorry for pushing you in the wrong direction

It’s a bit of a silly situation, I ran into it before when I created a flake for an unfree application. You can’t allow that unfree application in your nixpkgs system instantiation because the evaluation fails in the application flake; however, allowing that package there allows it on any system that uses the flake, even if they disallow unfree in their nixpkgs.

The input doesn’t really matter, it’s how the input is actually used in the flake. In fact it might be the overriding that is causing the issue in the first place when the flake you’re evaluating uses an older nixpkgs where the offensive package isn’t marked insecure yet and hence isn’t explicitly permitted, and then it fails because you’re overriding it with a nixpkgs where it is marked insecure.

I’m not sure this is the case here, but I once had it that an insecure package was a dependency of a package outside nixpkgs, in that case you need to allow the insecure package where the other package was defined. Your package whitelist only applies to your nixpkgs insurance, a non-nixpkgs package will use its own instance

His base by definition approves of him, the more interesting question is whether that base changes in size

If they weren’t, the headline probably wouldn’t have used the comparative

What you’re implying makes no sense.

The ships passing are not “NATO owned”. They’re most likely not even ships owned by the armed forces of NATO countries apart from the US. And even if they were attacked, this is outside of the territory of the NATO member state, which is a condition for triggering article 5.

Well, it doesn’t silently ignore files, it tells you if the work tree is dirty.

Though I’ve tripped over the different behaviors of the repl vs the rest of the tools myself in funny ways

That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn’t

I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you’re a member it doesn’t mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.

If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia’s borders? Surely a paper tiger isn’t detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?

Total disconnect from reality

He’s just preparing for an out, in a week or two he can tell on TV that Iran agreed to all demands and as such, the US gets out. Won’t work most likely, but maybe he’ll try.

That or he seriously believes this has happened because someone told him. Who knows! Or he might just contradict himself.

Debian systems have optionally collected this kind of data way before systemd existed via adduser.

As I said, he’s just flinging shit, it is dumb. But you have the same ideology on both sides, they’re very different cuts from the same cloth, so I don’t mind. There’s no real effect on common affairs, the connection between Japan declining to help and this isn’t there, no country is committing to any action in the strait.